Analisis Kesuksesan Sistem Informasi Manajemen Daerah (SIMDA) dengan Metode Delone dan Mclean Success Model dan Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)

Arie Vatresia, Tini Pasaribu
{"title":"Analisis Kesuksesan Sistem Informasi Manajemen Daerah (SIMDA) dengan Metode Delone dan Mclean Success Model dan Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)","authors":"Arie Vatresia, Tini Pasaribu","doi":"10.21456/vol13iss1pp70-77","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Eight years since the implementation of the Regional Management Information System (SIMDA), there has been no specific research to analyze the information system both in terms of implementation, system quality, user acceptance, and the success of the system in its implementation. This study aims to determine the success of implementing the program at the Bengkulu Provincial DPMD office using the DeLone And McLean IS Success Model and Technology Accepeance Model (TAM) with seven research variables (system quality, information quality, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, service quality, user satisfaction, and net benefits). Furthermore, this research provides recommendations that can be used to update SIMDA so that it suits user needs. The seven variables of this study resulted in twelve proposed hypotheses (six were rejected and another was accepted). Six paths of accepted hypothetical relationships are: system quality with ease of use; relationship between information quality and perceived usefulness; relationship between information quality and net benefits; relationship between service quality and perceived ease of use; relationship between perceived ease of use and user satisfaction; and relationship between perceived usefulness and user satisfaction. Meanwhile, the relationship path of the rejected hypotheses is the relationship between system quality and perceived usefulness, the relationship between system quality and net benefits, the relationship between information quality and perceived ease of use, the relationship between service quality and user satisfaction, the relationship between perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness, and the relationship between user satisfaction and net benefits.","PeriodicalId":141310,"journal":{"name":"J. Sistem Info. Bisnis","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"J. Sistem Info. Bisnis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21456/vol13iss1pp70-77","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Eight years since the implementation of the Regional Management Information System (SIMDA), there has been no specific research to analyze the information system both in terms of implementation, system quality, user acceptance, and the success of the system in its implementation. This study aims to determine the success of implementing the program at the Bengkulu Provincial DPMD office using the DeLone And McLean IS Success Model and Technology Accepeance Model (TAM) with seven research variables (system quality, information quality, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, service quality, user satisfaction, and net benefits). Furthermore, this research provides recommendations that can be used to update SIMDA so that it suits user needs. The seven variables of this study resulted in twelve proposed hypotheses (six were rejected and another was accepted). Six paths of accepted hypothetical relationships are: system quality with ease of use; relationship between information quality and perceived usefulness; relationship between information quality and net benefits; relationship between service quality and perceived ease of use; relationship between perceived ease of use and user satisfaction; and relationship between perceived usefulness and user satisfaction. Meanwhile, the relationship path of the rejected hypotheses is the relationship between system quality and perceived usefulness, the relationship between system quality and net benefits, the relationship between information quality and perceived ease of use, the relationship between service quality and user satisfaction, the relationship between perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness, and the relationship between user satisfaction and net benefits.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用德隆和麦克莱恩成功模型及技术接受模型(TAM)方法对区域管理信息系统(SIMDA)进行成功分析
地区管理信息系统(SIMDA)实施八年以来,一直没有专门的研究对信息系统的实施、系统质量、用户接受度以及系统实施的成功率进行分析。本研究旨在利用 DeLone And McLean 信息系统成功模型和技术接受模型(TAM),通过七个研究变量(系统质量、信息质量、感知有用性、感知易用性、服务质量、用户满意度和净收益)确定明古鲁省 DPMD 办事处实施该项目是否成功。此外,本研究还提供了一些建议,可用于更新 SIMDA,使其满足用户需求。本研究的七个变量产生了十二个假设(六个被否决,另一个被接受)。六个被接受的假设关系路径是:系统质量与易用性之间的关系;信息质量与感知有用性之间的关系;信息质量与净收益之间的关系;服务质量与感知易用性之间的关系;感知易用性与用户满意度之间的关系;感知有用性与用户满意度之间的关系。同时,拒绝假设的关系路径为系统质量与感知有用性的关系、系统质量与净效益的关系、信息质量与感知易用性的关系、服务质量与用户满意度的关系、感知易用性与感知有用性的关系、用户满意度与净效益的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analisis Kesuksesan Sistem Informasi Manajemen Daerah (SIMDA) dengan Metode Delone dan Mclean Success Model dan Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) Penambahan Variabel Tingkat Kecerdasan dari Chatbot untuk Mempengaruhi Kepercayaan Pengguna dalam Aplikasi Telekonsultasi Kesehatan Implementasi Framework Laravel Dalam Pembuatan Sistem Pencatatan Notula Berbasis Website Penerapan PIECES Framework dalam Analisis Kepuasan Pengguna F-Learn UKSW saat Pandemi Covid-19 Perbandingan Pre-Trained CNN: Klasifikasi Pengenalan Bahasa Isyarat Huruf Hijaiyah
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1