Behçet’s disease and COVID-19, retrospective analysis

Mai Nasser Elmohsen, Amr Khaled Abouaggour, Maha Youssef, Mohammad Aboulfotouh
{"title":"Behçet’s disease and COVID-19, retrospective analysis","authors":"Mai Nasser Elmohsen, Amr Khaled Abouaggour, Maha Youssef, Mohammad Aboulfotouh","doi":"10.4103/ejos.ejos_15_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose This study aimed to investigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and its consequences on the clinical condition of patients with Behçet’s uveitis and compare this with the pre-pandemic state. Patients and methods This retrospective observational study included patients with Behçet’s uveitis who had adequate follow-up before the pandemic (three visits before March 2020) and during the pandemic (two visits between March 2020 and September 2021). We compared uveitis activity, complication rates, and treatment changes during the pandemic with their preCOVID data. Patients who met the inclusion criteria were contacted by phone to confirm previous COVID-19 exposure and vaccination status. Results The study included 59 eyes of 30 patients with Behçet’s uveitis. There was a statistically significant difference between the preCOVID and COVID eras with respect to visual acuity, with median values changed from 1.033 to 1.3 (P=0.003). There was an increase in secondary glaucoma (16.9% to 30.5%, P=0.039), with a corresponding increase in antiglaucoma topical eye drops (20.3–35.6%) (P=0.012). The use of subtenon injections and systemic steroids decreased during the COVID-19 pandemic, but the difference was not statistically significant (P=0.687 and P=0.481, respectively). However, the average steroid dose and the number of subtenon injections per patient showed a statistically significant decrease during the pandemic (20 and 26.7 mg per day, respectively) compared to the preCOVID era (0 and 1 injection per patient) (P=0.007 and 0.027, respectively). Conclusion The COVID-19 pandemic did not result in increased uveitis activity, but a decrease in follow-up frequency led to more complications, mainly secondary glaucoma.","PeriodicalId":31572,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Egyptian Ophthalmological Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Egyptian Ophthalmological Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ejos.ejos_15_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This study aimed to investigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and its consequences on the clinical condition of patients with Behçet’s uveitis and compare this with the pre-pandemic state. Patients and methods This retrospective observational study included patients with Behçet’s uveitis who had adequate follow-up before the pandemic (three visits before March 2020) and during the pandemic (two visits between March 2020 and September 2021). We compared uveitis activity, complication rates, and treatment changes during the pandemic with their preCOVID data. Patients who met the inclusion criteria were contacted by phone to confirm previous COVID-19 exposure and vaccination status. Results The study included 59 eyes of 30 patients with Behçet’s uveitis. There was a statistically significant difference between the preCOVID and COVID eras with respect to visual acuity, with median values changed from 1.033 to 1.3 (P=0.003). There was an increase in secondary glaucoma (16.9% to 30.5%, P=0.039), with a corresponding increase in antiglaucoma topical eye drops (20.3–35.6%) (P=0.012). The use of subtenon injections and systemic steroids decreased during the COVID-19 pandemic, but the difference was not statistically significant (P=0.687 and P=0.481, respectively). However, the average steroid dose and the number of subtenon injections per patient showed a statistically significant decrease during the pandemic (20 and 26.7 mg per day, respectively) compared to the preCOVID era (0 and 1 injection per patient) (P=0.007 and 0.027, respectively). Conclusion The COVID-19 pandemic did not result in increased uveitis activity, but a decrease in follow-up frequency led to more complications, mainly secondary glaucoma.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
贝赫切特氏病与 COVID-19,回顾性分析
目的 本研究旨在调查 COVID-19 大流行及其后果对贝赫切特葡萄膜炎患者临床状况的影响,并将其与大流行前的状况进行比较。患者和方法 这项回顾性观察研究纳入了在大流行前(2020 年 3 月前就诊三次)和大流行期间(2020 年 3 月至 2021 年 9 月就诊两次)接受过充分随访的贝赫切特葡萄膜炎患者。我们将大流行期间的葡萄膜炎活动、并发症发生率和治疗方法的改变与大流行前的数据进行了比较。我们通过电话联系了符合纳入标准的患者,以确认他们之前是否接触过 COVID-19 和疫苗接种情况。结果 研究共纳入了 30 名贝赫切特葡萄膜炎患者的 59 只眼睛。COVID前和COVID时期的视力差异具有统计学意义,中位值从1.033变为1.3(P=0.003)。继发性青光眼有所增加(16.9% 至 30.5%,P=0.039),抗青光眼局部滴眼液的使用也相应增加(20.3% 至 35.6%)(P=0.012)。在 COVID-19 大流行期间,腱膜下注射和全身类固醇的使用有所减少,但差异无统计学意义(分别为 P=0.687 和 P=0.481)。然而,与 COVID 前(每位患者 0 次和 1 次注射)相比,大流行期间每位患者的平均类固醇剂量和腱膜下注射次数(分别为每天 20 毫克和 26.7 毫克)出现了统计学意义上的显著下降(分别为 P=0.007 和 0.027)。结论 COVID-19 大流行并未导致葡萄膜炎活动增加,但随访次数减少导致并发症增多,主要是继发性青光眼。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊最新文献
Early versus late initiation of infliximab for refractory uveitis in a cohort of Egyptian BD patients Evaluation of macular vessel density among patients with glaucoma, ocular hypertension, and normal participants “A study of knowledge, attitude and practice patterns regarding eye donation, eye banking and corneal transplantation in tertiary care hospital” Impact of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to peribulbar anesthesia on the retinal vasculature in glaucoma patients: an optical coherence tomography angiography study Changes in peripapillary and macular vasculature measured by optical coherence tomography angiography and their clinical correlation in patients with optic neuritis due to multiple sclerosis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1