Challenges and difficulties in diagnosis of normal-tension glaucoma

Islam Metwally, Mostafa Bahgat, Ahmed F. El-Shahed
{"title":"Challenges and difficulties in diagnosis of normal-tension glaucoma","authors":"Islam Metwally, Mostafa Bahgat, Ahmed F. El-Shahed","doi":"10.4103/ejos.ejos_30_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim The aim of this study is to clinically investigate the challenges and pitfalls of normal-tension glaucoma (NTG) diagnostic methods by ophthalmic clinical and investigative examinations. Setting This study was conducted at Al-Agouza Police Authority Hospital and Badr University Hospital. Methods A cross-sectional comparative study between the diagnosis of normal nonglaucoma patients and NTG. It included 40 normal nonglaucoma patients’ eyes as controls and 40 NTG patients’ eyes who met inclusion criteria. They were assessed by a complete ophthalmic exam., visual field (VF), and optical coherence tomography (OCT) variables between January 2022 and September 2022. Results The median age of the control group was 38 years old, while that of glaucomatous patients was 41 years old. The mean intraocular pressure (IOP) for the normal group was 15.53 mmHg (±1.935), while that for the glaucomatous group was 16.85 mmHg (±1.703). The intraocular pressure was considerably higher in the NTG group compared with the control (P = 0.0017). The mean deviation (MD) in dB of VF loss was considerably higher in the NTG group compared with the control (P = 0.0001). Also, the mean standard deviation (MSD) was considerably varied between the two groups (P < 0.0001). The average Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer (RNFL) in the NTG group, with a mean of 72.3 սm (±10.239) was significantly lower than in the control group with a mean of 102.025 սm (±7.454), P = 0.0001. Optic Disc Parameters: The Cup Area (mm2) was significantly wider in the NTG group with a mean of 1.62 (±0.476) than in the control with a mean of 1.297 (±0.44), P = 0.0024. Also, the Rim Area was significantly smaller in the NTG group with a mean of 0.614 (±0.342) than in the control with a mean of 1.135 (±0.319), P = 0.0024. The Cup/disc ratio was significantly larger in the NTG group than in the control group (P < 0.0001). The average Ganglion cell complex (GCC) was considerably thinner in the NTG patients in comparison to the controls (P = 0.0001). Conclusion The effects of NTG on VF and optic nerve seems to be more intensive. More focal notches and disc hemorrhage were noted in NTG. In the NTG group, the Cup Area was potentially wider, the rim area was significantly thinner, and the Cup/disc ratio was significantly larger.","PeriodicalId":31572,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Egyptian Ophthalmological Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Egyptian Ophthalmological Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ejos.ejos_30_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim The aim of this study is to clinically investigate the challenges and pitfalls of normal-tension glaucoma (NTG) diagnostic methods by ophthalmic clinical and investigative examinations. Setting This study was conducted at Al-Agouza Police Authority Hospital and Badr University Hospital. Methods A cross-sectional comparative study between the diagnosis of normal nonglaucoma patients and NTG. It included 40 normal nonglaucoma patients’ eyes as controls and 40 NTG patients’ eyes who met inclusion criteria. They were assessed by a complete ophthalmic exam., visual field (VF), and optical coherence tomography (OCT) variables between January 2022 and September 2022. Results The median age of the control group was 38 years old, while that of glaucomatous patients was 41 years old. The mean intraocular pressure (IOP) for the normal group was 15.53 mmHg (±1.935), while that for the glaucomatous group was 16.85 mmHg (±1.703). The intraocular pressure was considerably higher in the NTG group compared with the control (P = 0.0017). The mean deviation (MD) in dB of VF loss was considerably higher in the NTG group compared with the control (P = 0.0001). Also, the mean standard deviation (MSD) was considerably varied between the two groups (P < 0.0001). The average Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer (RNFL) in the NTG group, with a mean of 72.3 սm (±10.239) was significantly lower than in the control group with a mean of 102.025 սm (±7.454), P = 0.0001. Optic Disc Parameters: The Cup Area (mm2) was significantly wider in the NTG group with a mean of 1.62 (±0.476) than in the control with a mean of 1.297 (±0.44), P = 0.0024. Also, the Rim Area was significantly smaller in the NTG group with a mean of 0.614 (±0.342) than in the control with a mean of 1.135 (±0.319), P = 0.0024. The Cup/disc ratio was significantly larger in the NTG group than in the control group (P < 0.0001). The average Ganglion cell complex (GCC) was considerably thinner in the NTG patients in comparison to the controls (P = 0.0001). Conclusion The effects of NTG on VF and optic nerve seems to be more intensive. More focal notches and disc hemorrhage were noted in NTG. In the NTG group, the Cup Area was potentially wider, the rim area was significantly thinner, and the Cup/disc ratio was significantly larger.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
诊断正常张力型青光眼的挑战和困难
目的 本研究旨在通过眼科临床和调查检查,对正常张力性青光眼(NTG)诊断方法的挑战和误区进行临床研究。背景 本研究在 Al-Agouza 警察局医院和 Badr 大学医院进行。方法 对正常非青光眼患者和 NTG 的诊断进行横断面比较研究。研究包括 40 名正常非青光眼患者的眼睛作为对照,以及 40 名符合纳入标准的 NTG 患者的眼睛。他们在 2022 年 1 月至 2022 年 9 月期间接受了完整的眼科检查、视野(VF)和光学相干断层扫描(OCT)变量评估。结果 对照组的中位年龄为 38 岁,青光眼患者的中位年龄为 41 岁。正常组的平均眼压为 15.53 毫米汞柱(±1.935),而青光眼组为 16.85 毫米汞柱(±1.703)。与对照组相比,NTG 组的眼压明显更高(P = 0.0017)。与对照组相比,NTG 组 VF 损失 dB 的平均偏差(MD)明显更高(P = 0.0001)。此外,两组的平均标准偏差(MSD)也有很大差异(P < 0.0001)。NTG 组视网膜神经纤维层(RNFL)的平均值为 72.3 սm(±10.239),明显低于对照组的 102.025 սm(±7.454),P = 0.0001。视盘参数:NTG组的杯面积(mm2)平均为1.62(±0.476),明显比对照组的1.297(±0.44)宽,P = 0.0024。此外,NTG 组的边缘面积(平均值为 0.614(±0.342))明显小于对照组(平均值为 1.135(±0.319)),P = 0.0024。NTG组的杯/盘比率明显大于对照组(P < 0.0001)。与对照组相比,NTG 患者的平均神经节细胞复合体(GCC)要薄得多(P = 0.0001)。结论 NTG 对 VF 和视神经的影响似乎更为严重。在 NTG 中发现了更多的局灶凹痕和视盘出血。在 NTG 组中,杯区可能更宽,边缘区明显更薄,杯/盘比率明显增大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊最新文献
Early versus late initiation of infliximab for refractory uveitis in a cohort of Egyptian BD patients Evaluation of macular vessel density among patients with glaucoma, ocular hypertension, and normal participants “A study of knowledge, attitude and practice patterns regarding eye donation, eye banking and corneal transplantation in tertiary care hospital” Impact of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to peribulbar anesthesia on the retinal vasculature in glaucoma patients: an optical coherence tomography angiography study Changes in peripapillary and macular vasculature measured by optical coherence tomography angiography and their clinical correlation in patients with optic neuritis due to multiple sclerosis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1