Academic performance through multiple lenses: Intelligence, conscientiousness, and achievement striving motivation as differential predictors of objective and subjective measures of academic achievement in two studies of adolescents
Salome D. Odermatt , Rebekka Weidmann , Florine Schweizer , Alexander Grob
{"title":"Academic performance through multiple lenses: Intelligence, conscientiousness, and achievement striving motivation as differential predictors of objective and subjective measures of academic achievement in two studies of adolescents","authors":"Salome D. Odermatt , Rebekka Weidmann , Florine Schweizer , Alexander Grob","doi":"10.1016/j.jrp.2024.104461","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In a two-sample investigation of 766 adolescents, we examined the associations and incremental validity of test-based intelligence, parent-rated conscientiousness, and self-rated achievement striving motivation with objective (grades) and subjective (parent-reported and self-reported academic performance) measures of academic achievement. The two studies yielded largely similar results. Intelligence was related to objective and subjective performance ratings. Conscientiousness showed associations and explained variance beyond intelligence in grades and parent-reported but mostly not in self-reported academic performance. Achievement striving motivation was largely related to and explained variance beyond intelligence and conscientiousness in grades and subjective performance ratings. Findings indicate that traits and motives predict objective and subjective academic achievement measures incrementally to abilities. Differential relationships for conscientiousness depended on the informant of academic performance.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48406,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Personality","volume":"109 ","pages":"Article 104461"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092656624000096/pdfft?md5=ca94f23f63b356756090e29f1a071698&pid=1-s2.0-S0092656624000096-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Personality","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092656624000096","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In a two-sample investigation of 766 adolescents, we examined the associations and incremental validity of test-based intelligence, parent-rated conscientiousness, and self-rated achievement striving motivation with objective (grades) and subjective (parent-reported and self-reported academic performance) measures of academic achievement. The two studies yielded largely similar results. Intelligence was related to objective and subjective performance ratings. Conscientiousness showed associations and explained variance beyond intelligence in grades and parent-reported but mostly not in self-reported academic performance. Achievement striving motivation was largely related to and explained variance beyond intelligence and conscientiousness in grades and subjective performance ratings. Findings indicate that traits and motives predict objective and subjective academic achievement measures incrementally to abilities. Differential relationships for conscientiousness depended on the informant of academic performance.
期刊介绍:
Emphasizing experimental and descriptive research, the Journal of Research in Personality presents articles that examine important issues in the field of personality and in related fields basic to the understanding of personality. The subject matter includes treatments of genetic, physiological, motivational, learning, perceptual, cognitive, and social processes of both normal and abnormal kinds in human and animal subjects. Features: • Papers that present integrated sets of studies that address significant theoretical issues relating to personality. • Theoretical papers and critical reviews of current experimental and methodological interest. • Single, well-designed studies of an innovative nature. • Brief reports, including replication or null result studies of previously reported findings, or a well-designed studies addressing questions of limited scope.