Predicting users’ behavior: Gender and age as interactive antecedents of students’ Facebook use for research data collection

J. Petters, V. J. Owan, O. E. Okpa, D. Idika, R. A. Ojini, B. A. Ntamu, Augustine Igwe Robert, M. V. Owan, Stella Asu-Okang, Victor Eyo Essien
{"title":"Predicting users’ behavior: Gender and age as interactive antecedents of students’ Facebook use for research data collection","authors":"J. Petters, V. J. Owan, O. E. Okpa, D. Idika, R. A. Ojini, B. A. Ntamu, Augustine Igwe Robert, M. V. Owan, Stella Asu-Okang, Victor Eyo Essien","doi":"10.30935/ojcmt/14104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Previous studies have extensively examined how teachers and students utilize Facebook for instructional engagement, writing, research dissemination, and e-learning. However, there is a lack of research focusing on Facebook as a tool for collecting research data. This study aims to fill this gap by analyzing how final-year students utilize Facebook for research data collection (RDC). The study also assesses demographic differences in students’ use of Facebook for RDC. An online survey was conducted on a sample of 11,562 final-year students from tertiary institutions in Nigeria. The researchers followed global best practices in designing and validating the online survey. The survey items demonstrated clarity and relevance, with item content validity indices ranging from .71 to .99. Dimensionality and goodness of fit were assessed through exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Convergent validity was evaluated using average variance extracted, while discriminant validity was assessed using the Fornel-Larcker criterion and Heterotrait-Monotrait ratio. The composite reliability indices (.97, .94, and .90) confirmed the usability of the instrument’s three sub-scales. The study’s main findings revealed a significantly low usage of Facebook for RDC among students. Age was a significant predictor, indicating that older students used Facebook more for RDC. While males reported higher usage, the gender difference was negligible. The interaction of age and gender was significant in predicting students’ use of Facebook for RDC. These results have implications for future research, which are further discussed.","PeriodicalId":42941,"journal":{"name":"Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/14104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous studies have extensively examined how teachers and students utilize Facebook for instructional engagement, writing, research dissemination, and e-learning. However, there is a lack of research focusing on Facebook as a tool for collecting research data. This study aims to fill this gap by analyzing how final-year students utilize Facebook for research data collection (RDC). The study also assesses demographic differences in students’ use of Facebook for RDC. An online survey was conducted on a sample of 11,562 final-year students from tertiary institutions in Nigeria. The researchers followed global best practices in designing and validating the online survey. The survey items demonstrated clarity and relevance, with item content validity indices ranging from .71 to .99. Dimensionality and goodness of fit were assessed through exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Convergent validity was evaluated using average variance extracted, while discriminant validity was assessed using the Fornel-Larcker criterion and Heterotrait-Monotrait ratio. The composite reliability indices (.97, .94, and .90) confirmed the usability of the instrument’s three sub-scales. The study’s main findings revealed a significantly low usage of Facebook for RDC among students. Age was a significant predictor, indicating that older students used Facebook more for RDC. While males reported higher usage, the gender difference was negligible. The interaction of age and gender was significant in predicting students’ use of Facebook for RDC. These results have implications for future research, which are further discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预测用户行为:性别和年龄是学生使用 Facebook 收集研究数据的互动前因
以往的研究广泛考察了教师和学生如何利用 Facebook 进行教学参与、写作、研究传播和电子学习。然而,目前还缺乏将 Facebook 作为研究数据收集工具的研究。本研究旨在通过分析毕业班学生如何利用 Facebook 收集研究数据(RDC)来填补这一空白。本研究还评估了学生在使用 Facebook 进行 RDC 时的人口统计学差异。研究人员对尼日利亚高等院校的 11,562 名毕业班学生进行了在线抽样调查。研究人员在设计和验证在线调查时遵循了全球最佳实践。调查项目清晰、相关,项目内容有效性指数在 0.71 至 0.99 之间。通过探索性和确认性因子分析评估了维度和拟合度。收敛效度采用平均方差提取法进行评估,判别效度则采用 Fornel-Larcker 标准和异质-单质比率进行评估。综合信度指数(0.97、0.94 和 0.90)证实了该工具三个子量表的可用性。研究的主要结果显示,学生使用 Facebook 进行 RDC 的比例明显偏低。年龄是一个重要的预测因素,表明年龄较大的学生使用 Facebook 进行 RDC 的情况较多。虽然男生的使用率更高,但性别差异可以忽略不计。年龄和性别的交互作用对预测学生使用 Facebook 进行 RDC 有显著影响。这些结果对今后的研究具有启示意义,我们将对此作进一步讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
40
期刊最新文献
Spanish football clubs and social media visibility: The case of LaLiga EA Sports (2023/24 season) The role of strategic online engagement and content curation in professional branding and career advancement on social media platforms Analyzing the newspapers’ coverage of sustainable development goals in UAE Communicating educational innovation projects in Latin America mediated by the scaling of complex thinking: Contribution of the UNESCO-ICDE Chair in Mexico Digital media’s portrayal of climate change challenges during COP27 climate summit
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1