Giving and taking social support at work: An experience sampling study among coworker dyads

Marijntje E. L. Zeijen, Paraskevas Petrou, Arnold B. Bakker
{"title":"Giving and taking social support at work: An experience sampling study among coworker dyads","authors":"Marijntje E. L. Zeijen,&nbsp;Paraskevas Petrou,&nbsp;Arnold B. Bakker","doi":"10.1111/apps.12520","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Previous research has shown that both receiving support and providing support enhance employee well-being and work engagement. In the current study, we integrate social exchange theory (SET) and conservation of resources (COR) theory to investigate under which conditions receiving and providing daily support are most likely to occur. Specifically, we test the hypotheses that receiving requested support and reciprocating received support are more likely when the support is requested or received from a co-worker who perceives the quality of the exchange relationship as high (vs. low), and less likely when the support is requested or received from a co-worker high (vs. low) on workaholism. To test these hypotheses, we collected data among 45 employees and their co-workers during two moments per day for five consecutive working days (N = 90 participants; N = 614 work episodes). Multilevel analyses supported all hypotheses, except for the moderating effect of partner's workaholism on the link between receiving and providing support. These findings imply that receiving and providing support do not occur automatically but are dependent on characteristics of the exchange relationship and the exchange partner. We discuss the implications for SET and COR theories, as well as practical implications.</p>","PeriodicalId":48289,"journal":{"name":"Applied Psychology-An International Review-Psychologie Appliquee-Revue Internationale","volume":"73 3","pages":"1361-1385"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Psychology-An International Review-Psychologie Appliquee-Revue Internationale","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/apps.12520","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous research has shown that both receiving support and providing support enhance employee well-being and work engagement. In the current study, we integrate social exchange theory (SET) and conservation of resources (COR) theory to investigate under which conditions receiving and providing daily support are most likely to occur. Specifically, we test the hypotheses that receiving requested support and reciprocating received support are more likely when the support is requested or received from a co-worker who perceives the quality of the exchange relationship as high (vs. low), and less likely when the support is requested or received from a co-worker high (vs. low) on workaholism. To test these hypotheses, we collected data among 45 employees and their co-workers during two moments per day for five consecutive working days (N = 90 participants; N = 614 work episodes). Multilevel analyses supported all hypotheses, except for the moderating effect of partner's workaholism on the link between receiving and providing support. These findings imply that receiving and providing support do not occur automatically but are dependent on characteristics of the exchange relationship and the exchange partner. We discuss the implications for SET and COR theories, as well as practical implications.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在工作中给予和接受社会支持:同事间的经验取样研究
以往的研究表明,接受支持和提供支持都能提高员工的幸福感和工作投入度。在本研究中,我们结合了社会交换理论(SET)和资源保护理论(COR),研究在何种条件下最有可能接受和提供日常支持。具体来说,我们检验了以下假设:当被请求或从认为交换关系质量高(与低)的同事那里获得支持时,更有可能接受被请求的支持和回报被请求的支持;当被请求或从工作狂程度高(与低)的同事那里获得支持时,更不可能接受被请求的支持和回报被请求的支持。为了验证这些假设,我们收集了 45 名员工及其同事在连续五个工作日每天两个时刻的数据(N = 90 名参与者;N = 614 个工作事件)。除了伴侣的工作狂对接受支持和提供支持之间联系的调节作用外,多层次分析支持了所有假设。这些研究结果表明,接受和提供支持并不是自动发生的,而是取决于交换关系和交换伙伴的特征。我们讨论了 SET 和 COR 理论的含义以及实际意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
5.60%
发文量
84
期刊介绍: "Applied Psychology: An International Review" is the esteemed official journal of the International Association of Applied Psychology (IAAP), a venerable organization established in 1920 that unites scholars and practitioners in the field of applied psychology. This peer-reviewed journal serves as a global platform for the scholarly exchange of research findings within the diverse domain of applied psychology. The journal embraces a wide array of topics within applied psychology, including organizational, cross-cultural, educational, health, counseling, environmental, traffic, and sport psychology. It particularly encourages submissions that enhance the understanding of psychological processes in various applied settings and studies that explore the impact of different national and cultural contexts on psychological phenomena.
期刊最新文献
Who uses abusive supervision to punish deviant employees? An integration of identity threat and self-regulation perspectives Nature, predictors, and outcomes of Nurses' trajectories of harmonious and obsessive passion Sowing the seeds of love: Cultivating perceptions of culture of companionate love through listening and its effects on organizational outcomes Leading while playing: How leader fun pursuit affects leadership perceptions and evaluations Time after time: The influence of perceived coworker overtime, affect and workaholism on daily withdrawal responses
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1