首页 > 最新文献

Applied Psychology-An International Review-Psychologie Appliquee-Revue Internationale最新文献

英文 中文
Applying three theoretical lenses to further explore the boomerang career transition 运用三种理论视角进一步探索回旋职业转换
IF 4.9 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Pub Date : 2025-04-22 DOI: 10.1111/apps.70010
Ans De Vos, Sherry E. Sullivan

This article adds theoretical reflections on the boomerang transition process as presented by the Authors in their article ‘Examining boomerang mobility using a career transitions framework’. Based on their integration of previous studies of boomerang mobility with conservation of resources theory and the literature on career transitions, the authors provide a model that reflects the complexity of the boomerang process. The model advances our understanding of the dynamic nature of modern career transitions, which often deviate from traditional linear career paths. In this article, we further explore three of the key insights from the authors' model, namely the importance of time, the individual-based perspective, and the integration of both work and nonwork factors. Building from our own work in the field of career transitions, we use three theoretical lenses to guide our exploration, namely, the kaleidoscope career model (KCM), career inaction theory, and sustainable career theory. We discuss how the authors' model may be expanded by integrating it with these perspectives and how this can contribute to further incorporating the role of time in future research on the boomerang transition process. We advocate taking a whole career perspective, in which more than just the push and pull factors that influence the individual's decision to leave their previous employer are included. The boomerang transition can be further understood as it relates to an individual's past transitions and how it might impact future transitions as well as the influence of relationships, context, nonrationality, and forward and backward calculations on the boomerang decision-making and transition processes. We formulate several directions for the future study of boomerang transitions from this perspective.

本文补充了作者在其文章《利用职业生涯过渡框架考察回旋镖式流动》中提出的对回旋镖式过渡过程的理论思考。作者将以往对回旋镖式流动的研究与资源保护理论和有关职业过渡的文献进行了整合,在此基础上提供了一个反映回旋镖式流动过程复杂性的模型。该模型加深了我们对现代职业转换动态性质的理解,因为现代职业转换往往偏离传统的线性职业路径。在本文中,我们将进一步探讨作者模型中的三个关键见解,即时间的重要性、基于个人的视角以及工作和非工作因素的结合。基于我们自己在职业生涯转型领域的工作,我们使用三个理论视角来指导我们的探索,即万花筒职业生涯模型(KCM)、职业生涯不作为理论和可持续职业生涯理论。我们讨论了如何通过将作者的模型与这些观点相结合来扩展模型,以及这如何有助于将时间的作用进一步纳入未来关于回旋镖过渡过程的研究中。我们主张从整个职业生涯的角度出发,将影响个人决定离开前雇主的推拉因素纳入其中。我们还可以进一步理解 "回旋加速器 "式职业生涯转换与个人过去的职业生涯转换之间的关系,以及它可能对未来职业生涯转换产生的影响,还可以理解人际关系、背景、非理性、前向和后向计算对 "回旋加速器 "式职业生涯转换决策和转换过程的影响。从这个角度出发,我们为未来的回旋镖过渡研究提出了几个方向。
{"title":"Applying three theoretical lenses to further explore the boomerang career transition","authors":"Ans De Vos,&nbsp;Sherry E. Sullivan","doi":"10.1111/apps.70010","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.70010","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article adds theoretical reflections on the boomerang transition process as presented by the Authors in their article ‘Examining boomerang mobility using a career transitions framework’. Based on their integration of previous studies of boomerang mobility with conservation of resources theory and the literature on career transitions, the authors provide a model that reflects the complexity of the boomerang process. The model advances our understanding of the dynamic nature of modern career transitions, which often deviate from traditional linear career paths. In this article, we further explore three of the key insights from the authors' model, namely the importance of time, the individual-based perspective, and the integration of both work and nonwork factors. Building from our own work in the field of career transitions, we use three theoretical lenses to guide our exploration, namely, the kaleidoscope career model (KCM), career inaction theory, and sustainable career theory. We discuss how the authors' model may be expanded by integrating it with these perspectives and how this can contribute to further incorporating the role of time in future research on the boomerang transition process. We advocate taking a whole career perspective, in which more than just the push and pull factors that influence the individual's decision to leave their previous employer are included. The boomerang transition can be further understood as it relates to an individual's past transitions and how it might impact future transitions as well as the influence of relationships, context, nonrationality, and forward and backward calculations on the boomerang decision-making and transition processes. We formulate several directions for the future study of boomerang transitions from this perspective.</p>","PeriodicalId":48289,"journal":{"name":"Applied Psychology-An International Review-Psychologie Appliquee-Revue Internationale","volume":"74 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143857167","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Integrating diverse careers perspectives in boomerang mobility research 在回旋镖流动性研究中整合不同的职业视角
IF 4.9 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Pub Date : 2025-04-22 DOI: 10.1111/apps.70009
Katja Dlouhy, Ariane Froidevaux, Jos Akkermans
<p>Recent research on boomerang mobility has explored factors influencing individuals' decisions to engage in boomerang transitions, that is, returning to a previous employer, and the outcomes of these transitions. However, as outlined in our review and conceptual model (Dlouhy et al., <span>2025</span>), this research area is complex and primarily focused on organizational outcomes, overlooking central individual-level career perspectives.</p><p>We truly appreciate the insightful responses from two outstanding author teams (De Vos & Sullivan, <span>2025</span>; Makarius et al., <span>2025</span>) to our article. Expanding on our three opportunities for future scholarship, Makarius et al. (<span>2025</span>) presented a comprehensive set of further research directions that will enrich our understanding of the boomerang mobility process—both from the perspectives of organizational career management and individual career agency. De Vos and Sullivan (<span>2025</span>) further offered an analysis of the boomerang mobility process through three career theories: the kaleidoscope career model, career inaction theory, and sustainable career theory. They provide a rich set of research recommendations to facilitate their alignment with our conceptual model, informing future scholarship on boomerang mobility.</p><p>We welcome the opportunity to offer our reflections on these authors' responses to our article. We address three key takeaways from these excellent commentaries: the need for (1) further conceptual clarification of boomerang transitions and mobility, (2) the adoption of a holistic approach that integrates a diversity of career theories, and (3) a focus on the importance of social relationships in understanding boomerang transition decisions and outcomes.</p><p>We agree with Makarius et al. (<span>2025</span>) that achieving conceptual clarity is essential for understanding boomerang mobility. To clarify our positioning, first, we argue that, beyond time spent in an interim organization, the key characteristic of boomerang employment is <i>the need for a prior formal exit of an Organization A</i>—marked, for example, by a definitive end date of employment or by contract termination—for a later return under a new contract. Notably, career transitions involving self-employment (Snyder et al., <span>2021</span>), volunteering, or other pursuits where individuals fully sever ties with Organization A and thus have an exit transition, meet the criteria for boomerang transitions. In contrast, according to our definition, family leaves or sabbaticals do not constitute boomerang mobility when the employment relationship with the original organization remains intact during the leave. Situations like post-retirement bridge employment (Shipp et al., <span>2014</span>), hiring a former intern (e.g., Ali & Swart, <span>2024</span>), or extended research visits (Swider et al., <span>2017</span>) may be more in a gray zone. These would be considered boom
最近对“回巢族流动”的研究探讨了影响个人决定进行“回巢族过渡”(即回到前雇主)的因素,以及这些过渡的结果。然而,正如我们的综述和概念模型(Dlouhy et al., 2025)所概述的那样,这一研究领域很复杂,主要关注组织成果,忽视了个人层面的核心职业前景。我们非常感谢来自两个优秀作者团队(De Vos &amp;沙利文,2025;马卡留斯等人,2025)到我们的文章。马卡留斯等人(2025)扩展了我们未来研究的三个机会,提出了一套全面的进一步研究方向,从组织职业管理和个人职业代理的角度丰富了我们对回旋镖流动过程的理解。De Vos和Sullivan(2025)进一步通过万花筒职业模型、职业不作为理论和可持续职业理论三种职业理论对回巢流动过程进行了分析。他们提供了一套丰富的研究建议,以促进他们与我们的概念模型的一致性,为未来的回旋镖流动性奖学金提供信息。我们欢迎有机会就这些作者对我们文章的回应提出我们的看法。我们从这些优秀的评论中提出了三个关键要点:需要(1)进一步澄清回旋镖过渡和流动性的概念,(2)采用整合多种职业理论的整体方法,以及(3)关注社会关系在理解回旋镖过渡决策和结果中的重要性。我们同意Makarius等人(2025)的观点,即实现概念清晰度对于理解回飞镖的流动性至关重要。为了澄清我们的定位,首先,我们认为,除了在临时组织中度过的时间之外,回旋雇佣的关键特征是需要事先正式退出组织-例如,以明确的雇佣结束日期或合同终止为标志-以便稍后根据新合同返回。值得注意的是,涉及自营职业(Snyder et al., 2021)、志愿服务或其他个人与组织A完全断绝关系并因此发生退出过渡的职业过渡符合回巢式过渡的标准。相反,根据我们的定义,当休假期间与原组织的雇佣关系保持不变时,家事假或公休不构成回巢流动。退休后的桥梁就业(Shipp et al., 2014),雇佣前实习生(如Ali &amp;Swart, 2024),或延长的研究访问(Swider等人,2017)可能更多地处于灰色地带。只有当工人的权利和作为内部人士的地位在可能回归之前正式丧失时,这些转变才会被认为是回旋式的转变。第二,我们认为,与A组织正式终止雇用相比,在界定回旋流动方面更为关键的是在此期间开展的活动的具体性质。我们同意Makarius等人(2025)的观点,即“组织B”不一定是一个实际的组织,也可能是另一个工作或非工作目的地(即,进入和退出劳动力;沙利文,Al Ariss, 2022)。与Makarius等人(2025)达成一致,其他工作目的地包括零工、合同工作和其他类型的工作。在个体活跃于非工作领域而不是“组织B”的情况下(例如,当某人正式离开他们的组织以承担父母或照顾责任时),我们模型中与组织B相关的远端因素和近端因素以及心理机制将有所不同。在这些情况下,其他文献,如工作-生活冲击事件(Crawford et al., 2019)和非工作取向(Hall et al., 2013),可能会更好地说明这些机制。总而言之,要决定一种情况是否可以归类为回巢式过渡,“员工在返回之前是否正式离开过公司?”应该是肯定的。回旋镖的流动性可以通过各种超越资源保护视角的理论镜头来理解(Sullivan &amp;Al Ariss, 2022),我们将其用于我们的概念模型。在这两篇评论中,一个中心问题涉及到个体在决定是否进行回旋镖过渡时如何评估远端和近端推拉因素。首先,从职业不作为理论的角度来看,我们同意De Vos和Sullivan(2025)的观点,即回旋镖决策可能并不总是涉及对得失的理性权衡。例如,非理性可能会影响我们概念模型中提出的“向后看”机制,其中个人或情境层面的因素可能会影响对组织A的记忆。 我们也承认有必要研究内部惯性力。与跳槽到一家新公司相比,回旋式跳槽似乎是一种更被动的职业选择,但考虑到个人职业介绍所的作用是至关重要的。回归的员工不仅仅是对减少的不确定性做出反应,他们也不是被“拉回”到组织a中。他们在重新融入的过程中积极地塑造了他们的回归。这进一步提出了关于代理回旋镖在引导其返回以及这些行为如何影响其后续表现方面发挥作用的程度和性质的问题(Makarius et al., 2025)。因此,研究职业机构和惯性力如何在回旋镖移动过程中相互作用,可以进一步深入了解这一过程。其次,De Vos和Sullivan(2025)关于万花筒职业模型的一个特别有趣的命题是研究职业优先级在整个生命周期中的变化,这可能解释回旋镖式转变是否更有可能发生在职业生涯的早期、中期或后期。寿命理论在这里可能会有所帮助(有关回顾,请参阅Zacher &amp;Froidevaux, 2021)。例如,社会情绪选择理论(SST;(见Carstensen, 2021年的评论)表明,随着年龄的增长,员工认为他们未来的时间前景更加有限,因此,他们更喜欢高质量的关系和情感目标,而不是工具目标。因此,来自组织A和组织B的关系性质的最近前因(例如,感知到的组织支持,文化,管理者的领导风格,以及人际冲突的缺乏)可能对考虑回旋过渡的老年员工特别重要。回到万花筒职业模型,海表温度将预测更重要的平衡优先在老年和年轻的挑战。因此,对于年轻员工来说,两家公司的关键近缘因素可能与职业发展机会或绩效管理系统有关。第三,正如马卡留斯等人(2025)所指出的,身份坚持是回旋镖流动性的另一个关键因素。个人可能会回到他们职业生涯早期工作过的组织,这表明职业认同是通过这些举动形成的。根据社会认同理论(Tajfel, 1978),在个人层面上,员工可能会继续认同他们过去在组织A中的成员身份。或者,作为我们模型(b)阶段的一部分,员工可能会从事认同工作(即认知、话语、身体和行为活动),目的是修复、加强或削弱他们与组织A和b相关的工作身份;Caza et al., 2018)。在组织层面,决策的一个重要因素可能是组织A和B对身份工作支持的参与,即“鼓励、允许或提供机会思考、谈论或展示工作和非工作身份的各个方面,或参与促进对身份的理解和分享的活动”的行动(Jean et al., 2024, p. 1287);鉴于其与员工情感组织承诺和组织认同正相关。第四,我们同意De Vos和Sullivan(2025)的观点,即可持续职业理论(De Vos et al., 2020)通过整合个人和组织视角,拓宽了回旋镖流动性研究。它关注个人能动性、环境因素以及幸福、健康和生产力的平衡,提供了一个细致的观点,支持整个职业视角,并为未来的研究提供了有价值的方向。因此,我们同意,在未来的研究中,它可能是一个有价值的理论镜头,以调和现有的组织(人力资源管理)和个人(心理学)对回旋镖流动性的看法。两篇评论都强调,社会关系是回旋镖流动性的一个关键方面。特别是,我们同意,关注工作场所内部的关系和同事在重新进入组织a后的反应,对于解释回旋镖式的过渡结果尤其重要——这在最近发表的工作中得到了强调(Grohsjean等人,2024;王,棉花,2025)。值得注意的是,组织A的在职员工并不比新员工(Grohsjean et al., 2024)对回巢族更有帮助,这一发现可能源于诸如感知不忠等因
{"title":"Integrating diverse careers perspectives in boomerang mobility research","authors":"Katja Dlouhy,&nbsp;Ariane Froidevaux,&nbsp;Jos Akkermans","doi":"10.1111/apps.70009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.70009","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;Recent research on boomerang mobility has explored factors influencing individuals' decisions to engage in boomerang transitions, that is, returning to a previous employer, and the outcomes of these transitions. However, as outlined in our review and conceptual model (Dlouhy et al., &lt;span&gt;2025&lt;/span&gt;), this research area is complex and primarily focused on organizational outcomes, overlooking central individual-level career perspectives.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We truly appreciate the insightful responses from two outstanding author teams (De Vos &amp; Sullivan, &lt;span&gt;2025&lt;/span&gt;; Makarius et al., &lt;span&gt;2025&lt;/span&gt;) to our article. Expanding on our three opportunities for future scholarship, Makarius et al. (&lt;span&gt;2025&lt;/span&gt;) presented a comprehensive set of further research directions that will enrich our understanding of the boomerang mobility process—both from the perspectives of organizational career management and individual career agency. De Vos and Sullivan (&lt;span&gt;2025&lt;/span&gt;) further offered an analysis of the boomerang mobility process through three career theories: the kaleidoscope career model, career inaction theory, and sustainable career theory. They provide a rich set of research recommendations to facilitate their alignment with our conceptual model, informing future scholarship on boomerang mobility.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We welcome the opportunity to offer our reflections on these authors' responses to our article. We address three key takeaways from these excellent commentaries: the need for (1) further conceptual clarification of boomerang transitions and mobility, (2) the adoption of a holistic approach that integrates a diversity of career theories, and (3) a focus on the importance of social relationships in understanding boomerang transition decisions and outcomes.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We agree with Makarius et al. (&lt;span&gt;2025&lt;/span&gt;) that achieving conceptual clarity is essential for understanding boomerang mobility. To clarify our positioning, first, we argue that, beyond time spent in an interim organization, the key characteristic of boomerang employment is &lt;i&gt;the need for a prior formal exit of an Organization A&lt;/i&gt;—marked, for example, by a definitive end date of employment or by contract termination—for a later return under a new contract. Notably, career transitions involving self-employment (Snyder et al., &lt;span&gt;2021&lt;/span&gt;), volunteering, or other pursuits where individuals fully sever ties with Organization A and thus have an exit transition, meet the criteria for boomerang transitions. In contrast, according to our definition, family leaves or sabbaticals do not constitute boomerang mobility when the employment relationship with the original organization remains intact during the leave. Situations like post-retirement bridge employment (Shipp et al., &lt;span&gt;2014&lt;/span&gt;), hiring a former intern (e.g., Ali &amp; Swart, &lt;span&gt;2024&lt;/span&gt;), or extended research visits (Swider et al., &lt;span&gt;2017&lt;/span&gt;) may be more in a gray zone. These would be considered boom","PeriodicalId":48289,"journal":{"name":"Applied Psychology-An International Review-Psychologie Appliquee-Revue Internationale","volume":"74 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/apps.70009","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143861696","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Refining the challenges of the boomerang mobility process 改进回旋镖移动过程的挑战
IF 4.9 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Pub Date : 2025-04-22 DOI: 10.1111/apps.70013
Erin E. Makarius, Gina Dokko, Alison M. Dachner
<p>Boomerang workers are both a common phenomenon in practice and theoretically interesting, so the fact that the literature studying them is in its infancy is somewhat surprising. At the same time, the relative dearth of studies opens numerous possibilities for research. In “Navigating the boomerang mobility process: A conceptual framework and agenda for future research” Dlouhy, Froidevaux, and Akkermans review published boomerang studies, build a process model that delineates stages of boomeranging, and present an agenda for future research. Their individual-level perspective provides a necessary complement to employer-centric theory and encourages theorizing about psychological mechanisms as well as agency and volition on the part of the mover. Further, their careers' perspective lends itself to thinking about the past and future and the process of becoming a boomerang, which has both proximal and distal antecedents that the authors build into their model.</p><p>In addition to presenting a process model with a comprehensive set of items and issues at each stage, Dlouhy et al. pose three challenges that researchers should address as knowledge about boomerang workers develops. Addressing each of these three challenges yields a number of questions that need to be resolved. We, too, find that addressing these challenges presents additional opportunities to enrich understanding of the phenomenon. We believe that further refining these challenges can enable an even richer set of research directions that will advance theoretical knowledge about boomerangs and careers and organizations more generally.</p><p>Establishing conceptual clarity is an important aspect of producing a framework like the boomerang mobility process proposed by Dlouhy et al. The authors define boomerangs and propose future research questions intended to further explore the conceptual clarity of boomerangs and the boomerang mobility process. We agree that conceptual clarity is needed yet wonder if the model developed for boomerang career transitions could have broader application to both work and nonwork transitions.</p><p>Dlouhy et al. recommend that the boomerang mobility process focuses only on boomerang transitions between organizations (Organization A➔Organization B➔Organization A), consistent with boomerang definitions in other careers research (e.g., Keller et al., <span>2020</span>; Swider et al., <span>2017</span>). However, as noted by the authors, research exists that also delineates other life experiences such as self-employment or temporarily leaving the workforce (Shipp et al., <span>2014</span>; Snyder et al., <span>2021</span>) as boomerang transitions. This inconsistency in the literature makes the conceptual clarity about what a boomerang career transition is and the applicability of the proposed framework warranting additional discussion.</p><p>Since fewer modern careers involve traditional career paths moving from one company to another (Spreitzer et al., <span
“回巢族”在实践中是一种普遍现象,在理论上也是一种有趣的现象,所以研究他们的文献才刚刚起步,这有点令人惊讶。与此同时,研究的相对匮乏为研究提供了许多可能性。在“引导回旋镖流动过程:未来研究的概念框架和议程”中,Dlouhy, Froidevaux和Akkermans回顾了已发表的回旋镖研究,建立了一个描述回旋镖阶段的过程模型,并提出了未来研究的议程。他们的个人层面的观点为雇主中心理论提供了必要的补充,并鼓励了关于心理机制的理论化,以及行动者的代理和意志。此外,他们的职业视角有助于思考过去和未来,以及成为回旋镖的过程,作者在模型中建立了近端和远端前因。除了在每个阶段提出一套全面的项目和问题的过程模型外,Dlouhy等人还提出了研究人员应该解决的三个挑战,即随着对回巢族工人知识的发展。解决这三个挑战中的每一个都会产生一些需要解决的问题。我们也发现,解决这些挑战为丰富对这一现象的理解提供了额外的机会。我们相信,进一步完善这些挑战可以提供更丰富的研究方向,从而更广泛地推进有关回旋镖、职业和组织的理论知识。建立概念清晰度是产生一个框架的一个重要方面,如Dlouhy等人提出的回旋镖流动过程。作者定义了回飞镖,并提出了未来的研究问题,旨在进一步探讨回飞镖的概念清晰度和回飞镖的流动过程。我们同意概念上的清晰是必要的,但我们想知道,为“回巢族”职业过渡开发的模型是否可以更广泛地应用于工作和非工作过渡。Dlouhy等人建议,回旋镖流动过程仅关注组织(组织A、组织B、组织A)之间的回旋镖过渡,这与其他职业研究中的回旋镖定义一致(例如,Keller等人,2020;Swider et al., 2017)。然而,正如作者所指出的,研究也描述了其他生活经历,如自主创业或暂时离开劳动力市场(Shipp等人,2014;Snyder et al., 2021)作为回旋镖过渡。文献中的这种不一致使得关于什么是回旋职业过渡的概念清晰,以及所提出框架的适用性需要进一步讨论。由于越来越少的现代职业涉及从一家公司到另一家公司的传统职业路径(Spreitzer et al., 2017),也许由Dlouhy等人建立的回旋流动过程可以作为未来研究的指南,即使没有组织b。我们注意到,回旋过程的定义提供了(“一系列的职业过渡,从原雇主(“组织A”)的退出过渡开始,到雇员返回原雇主的回旋过渡结束。”)并不排除非雇佣期间的经历。从理论上讲,如果个人经历了与组织B相关的远端和近端推拉前因,即使在非组织环境中,该过程也可能类似。例如,人们离开一个组织去承担家庭照顾的责任,比如抚养孩子或照顾老人,他们可能会对这些责任感到牵引力和反牵引力,对这些责任产生推搡和反推搡,这可能会影响回到组织a的经验和结果。将回巢式职业转变限制为只涉及在另一个组织工作的职业转变,可能会不必要地限制应用所提出的模型来指导未来研究的能力。关于回旋流动过程概念清晰度的第二个考虑是对为A组织工作的含义进行明确分类。通常,人们可能会认为这意味着全职工作。然而,在现代工作环境中,随着合同工作、远程工作、零工工作和兼职工作的增加,就业模式正在发生变化(Ashford等人,2018;沙利文,Al Ariss, 2021)。这种转变激发了对这些工作安排如何影响个人和团队态度和行为以及组织成果的研究(Spreitzer et al., 2017)。因此,定义哪些员工-组织关系构成了组织A的就业,这在理论上对于“回旋镖”流动过程和拟议框架的概念清晰度很重要。 理解推拉因素之间的相互作用及其背后的心理动力,对于“回巢族”来说是一个相关的挑战,与其他类型的职业过渡相比,他们可能面临着独特的情况。除了作者就这一挑战所考虑的问题之外,通过考虑(1)组织在离职过程中的作用,(2)与目的地相关的拉因素,以及(3)身份持久性中可能存在的拉回,探索推/拉过程本身也是有价值的。Dlouhy等人发现了一个重要的观点,即人们离职的自愿或非自愿性质可能是一个相关的推动因素。除了原因之外,个人如何离开也很重要,因为退出和离职过程会影响到与“回飞”相关的未来决策(Dachner &amp;Makarius, 2021)。研究表明,个人离开时的感受(即人员流动影响)会影响校友的态度和行为,这可能会影响回退者回到组织的体验和可能性(Makarius et al., 2024)。如果个人在离职时接受了理想的离职和校友实践(例如,在离职时接受庆祝活动、工作协助和支持),他们在离职后更有可能积极地看待公司,参与校友公民行为,使公司受益,并最终返回公司。公司可以通过改善离职管理和创建校友项目来维持与前员工的关系,从而管理个人如何经历这一过程(Dachner &amp;Makarius, 2022)。与此相关,个人前往的目的地可能是一个拉动因素,影响体验和回报的可能性。前雇主可能不会积极看待那些为竞争对手工作的人,因为他们不太可能与这些人合作(卡纳汉&amp;Somaya, 2013)。另一方面,研究表明,校友可能会聚集在某些目的地公司(Brymer et al., 2014),这使得离职和回归可能性的社会动态更具挑战性。就像非工作目的地是对概念清晰度的考虑一样,作为拉动因素的心理机制可能会以不同的方式发挥作用,使个人在那种环境中的回旋镖体验变得有趣和复杂。此外,回调到原始组织可能会随着身份的持久性而发生。研究表明,遗产识别的发生使个人保持与前雇主的联系感(Eury等人,2018;惠特曼,2019)。未来对回旋镖的研究可以检验识别的持久性,以及随着时间的推移,多次运动如何影响识别和返回的可能性。对人力资本流动的研究表明,声誉在推动流动中的重要性(Makarius &amp;Stevens, 2019),因此,声誉较好的公司更有可能看到身份持续存在,从而自来自往。职业印记的作用,或在关键职业时刻形成的认知和行为模式(Dokko &amp;江,2024;Higgins, 2006),关于身份的研究也可能对未来的研究很有趣。将个人和组织对绩效的看法结合起来当然是有价值的,对于“回巢族”来说尤其如此,他们被雇佣的前提是他们能够“迅速投入工作”,并且比其他新员工更快地开始工作(Keller et al., 2020)。但正如Dlouhy等人指出的那样,关于回旋镖性能的记录好坏参半。理解回旋镖绩效是调整观点的关键,因为个人绩效对个人和组织都至关重要,而个人能力是公司人力资本资源的基础(Ployhart等人,2014;Ployhart,Moliterno, 2011)。从理论上更好地理解回飞镖性能的一种方法是研究回飞镖性能的独特潜在机制。正如Dlouhy等人所说,“回巢族”拥有公司特有的技能和认知模式,可以促进过渡,但当他们重新进入一个影响绩效的组织时,“回巢族”实际上会做些什么呢?研究表明,与其他新员工相比,回旋镖对在职员工更有帮助(Grohsjean et al., 2024),这可能会影响他们自己的表现,但也可以提高同事和工作团队的表现。回旋镖族的乐于助人也可能是他们与其他内部工作组协调并获得合作的能力的基础,从而影响他们的表现(Keller et al., 2020)。导致更好的协调和合作的帮助可以是
{"title":"Refining the challenges of the boomerang mobility process","authors":"Erin E. Makarius,&nbsp;Gina Dokko,&nbsp;Alison M. Dachner","doi":"10.1111/apps.70013","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.70013","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;Boomerang workers are both a common phenomenon in practice and theoretically interesting, so the fact that the literature studying them is in its infancy is somewhat surprising. At the same time, the relative dearth of studies opens numerous possibilities for research. In “Navigating the boomerang mobility process: A conceptual framework and agenda for future research” Dlouhy, Froidevaux, and Akkermans review published boomerang studies, build a process model that delineates stages of boomeranging, and present an agenda for future research. Their individual-level perspective provides a necessary complement to employer-centric theory and encourages theorizing about psychological mechanisms as well as agency and volition on the part of the mover. Further, their careers' perspective lends itself to thinking about the past and future and the process of becoming a boomerang, which has both proximal and distal antecedents that the authors build into their model.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In addition to presenting a process model with a comprehensive set of items and issues at each stage, Dlouhy et al. pose three challenges that researchers should address as knowledge about boomerang workers develops. Addressing each of these three challenges yields a number of questions that need to be resolved. We, too, find that addressing these challenges presents additional opportunities to enrich understanding of the phenomenon. We believe that further refining these challenges can enable an even richer set of research directions that will advance theoretical knowledge about boomerangs and careers and organizations more generally.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Establishing conceptual clarity is an important aspect of producing a framework like the boomerang mobility process proposed by Dlouhy et al. The authors define boomerangs and propose future research questions intended to further explore the conceptual clarity of boomerangs and the boomerang mobility process. We agree that conceptual clarity is needed yet wonder if the model developed for boomerang career transitions could have broader application to both work and nonwork transitions.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Dlouhy et al. recommend that the boomerang mobility process focuses only on boomerang transitions between organizations (Organization A➔Organization B➔Organization A), consistent with boomerang definitions in other careers research (e.g., Keller et al., &lt;span&gt;2020&lt;/span&gt;; Swider et al., &lt;span&gt;2017&lt;/span&gt;). However, as noted by the authors, research exists that also delineates other life experiences such as self-employment or temporarily leaving the workforce (Shipp et al., &lt;span&gt;2014&lt;/span&gt;; Snyder et al., &lt;span&gt;2021&lt;/span&gt;) as boomerang transitions. This inconsistency in the literature makes the conceptual clarity about what a boomerang career transition is and the applicability of the proposed framework warranting additional discussion.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Since fewer modern careers involve traditional career paths moving from one company to another (Spreitzer et al., &lt;span","PeriodicalId":48289,"journal":{"name":"Applied Psychology-An International Review-Psychologie Appliquee-Revue Internationale","volume":"74 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/apps.70013","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143861697","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Navigating the boomerang mobility process: A conceptual framework and agenda for future research 引导回旋流动过程:概念框架和未来研究议程
IF 4.9 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Pub Date : 2025-04-21 DOI: 10.1111/apps.70012
Katja Dlouhy, Ariane Froidevaux, Jos Akkermans

What happens when people leave an organization but return to it later? Expanding the dominant organizational and HRM perspectives on boomerang employment, we advocate for a career transition approach that incorporates an individual focus. We define the boomerang mobility process as a series of career transitions, starting with the exit transition from the original employer, and ending with the boomerang transition when that employee returns to that original employer. We offer a comprehensive conceptual model of the boomerang mobility process, including its antecedents, mediating processes, outcomes, and boundary conditions. By providing insights into the organizational and individual considerations that may influence employees' decision to rejoin an organization, this conceptual model expands the career mobility scholarship and offers a more nuanced understanding of individuals' career development.

当人们离开一个组织但后来又回到这个组织时会发生什么?我们从组织和人力资源管理的主流视角出发,对 "回迁式就业 "进行了扩展,主张采用一种以个人为中心的职业过渡方法。我们将回迁式流动过程定义为一系列的职业过渡,从离开原雇主开始,到该员工返回原雇主时的回迁式过渡结束。我们为回旋镖式流动过程提供了一个全面的概念模型,包括其前因后果、中介过程、结果和边界条件。通过深入分析可能影响员工重新加入组织决定的组织和个人因素,这一概念模型拓展了职业流动的学术领域,并提供了对个人职业发展更细致入微的理解。
{"title":"Navigating the boomerang mobility process: A conceptual framework and agenda for future research","authors":"Katja Dlouhy,&nbsp;Ariane Froidevaux,&nbsp;Jos Akkermans","doi":"10.1111/apps.70012","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.70012","url":null,"abstract":"<p>What happens when people leave an organization but return to it later? Expanding the dominant organizational and HRM perspectives on boomerang employment, we advocate for a career transition approach that incorporates an individual focus. We define the boomerang mobility process as a series of career transitions, starting with the exit transition from the original employer, and ending with the boomerang transition when that employee returns to that original employer. We offer a comprehensive conceptual model of the boomerang mobility process, including its antecedents, mediating processes, outcomes, and boundary conditions. By providing insights into the organizational and individual considerations that may influence employees' decision to rejoin an organization, this conceptual model expands the career mobility scholarship and offers a more nuanced understanding of individuals' career development.</p>","PeriodicalId":48289,"journal":{"name":"Applied Psychology-An International Review-Psychologie Appliquee-Revue Internationale","volume":"74 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/apps.70012","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143857053","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Balancing health and work: Fear predicts gig workers' goals and behaviors during COVID-19 平衡健康和工作:恐惧预测了COVID-19期间零工工人的目标和行为
IF 4.9 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Pub Date : 2025-04-15 DOI: 10.1111/apps.70014
Jenna A. Van Fossen, Jo M. Alanis, Sergio M. Marquez, Adam Tresidder

Findings are mixed regarding fear and performance behaviors. Whereas resource-based theories suggest that fear impairs performance, perspectives on emotion regulation argue that fear is motivating. It is also unclear how independent workers prioritize between potentially competing health and work goals. We help reconcile disputes by implicating goal setting for gig workers' effective functioning. We studied relationships between COVID-19 fear, COVID-19 preventative health goals and work hour goals, and actual health and work behaviors over four weekly surveys with gig workers (N = 49) during the summer of 2020. Fear of COVID-19 was assessed in a baseline survey, health and work goals were assessed at Time 1, and health and work behaviors were assessed three days later at Time 2. Supporting predictions, although COVID-19 fear may prompt greater health behaviors, fear might also still undermine these behaviors through the weakening of health goal setting. However, results did not support predictions that health and work goals conflict. Instead, at the between-person level, Time 1 health goals were linked to greater Time 2 health and work behaviors. Findings contribute to the theory of the relationship between fear, motivation, and performance. Organizations and workers may prioritize health goals for both health and work performance during a crisis.

关于恐惧和表现行为的研究结果喜忧参半。尽管资源基础理论认为恐惧会损害表现,但情绪调节的观点认为恐惧具有激励作用。同样不清楚的是,独立工作者如何在可能相互竞争的健康和工作目标之间进行优先排序。我们通过为零工员工的有效运作设定目标来帮助调解纠纷。我们在2020年夏季对零工(N = 49)进行了四次每周调查,研究了COVID-19恐惧、COVID-19预防健康目标和工作时间目标以及实际健康和工作行为之间的关系。在基线调查中评估对COVID-19的恐惧,在时间1评估健康和工作目标,三天后在时间2评估健康和工作行为。支持预测,尽管对COVID-19的恐惧可能会促使更多的健康行为,但恐惧也可能通过削弱健康目标设定来破坏这些行为。然而,结果并不支持健康和工作目标冲突的预测。相反,在人与人之间的层面上,时间1的健康目标与时间2的健康和工作行为联系在一起。研究结果有助于建立恐惧、动机和表现之间关系的理论。在危机期间,组织和员工可能会优先考虑健康和工作绩效的健康目标。
{"title":"Balancing health and work: Fear predicts gig workers' goals and behaviors during COVID-19","authors":"Jenna A. Van Fossen,&nbsp;Jo M. Alanis,&nbsp;Sergio M. Marquez,&nbsp;Adam Tresidder","doi":"10.1111/apps.70014","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.70014","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Findings are mixed regarding fear and performance behaviors. Whereas resource-based theories suggest that fear impairs performance, perspectives on emotion regulation argue that fear is motivating. It is also unclear how independent workers prioritize between potentially competing health and work goals. We help reconcile disputes by implicating goal setting for gig workers' effective functioning. We studied relationships between COVID-19 fear, COVID-19 preventative health goals and work hour goals, and actual health and work behaviors over four weekly surveys with gig workers (N = 49) during the summer of 2020. Fear of COVID-19 was assessed in a baseline survey, health and work goals were assessed at Time 1, and health and work behaviors were assessed three days later at Time 2. Supporting predictions, although COVID-19 fear may prompt greater health behaviors, fear might also still undermine these behaviors through the weakening of health goal setting. However, results did not support predictions that health and work goals conflict. Instead, at the between-person level, Time 1 health goals were linked to greater Time 2 health and work behaviors. Findings contribute to the theory of the relationship between fear, motivation, and performance. Organizations and workers may prioritize health goals for both health and work performance during a crisis.</p>","PeriodicalId":48289,"journal":{"name":"Applied Psychology-An International Review-Psychologie Appliquee-Revue Internationale","volume":"74 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/apps.70014","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143831217","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Changes in perceived age discrimination over time: Patterns, predictors, and outcomes 感知年龄歧视随时间的变化:模式、预测因素和结果
IF 4.9 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Pub Date : 2025-04-08 DOI: 10.1111/apps.70011
Ariane Froidevaux, Yiduo Shao, Ieva Urbanaviciute, Serge da Motta Veiga, Mo Wang, Franciska Krings

Age discrimination at work represents a major challenge with detrimental impacts on employees and organizations. Although age discrimination theories suggest that workers experience increasing levels of age discrimination over time, prior evidence suggests that there may be substantial heterogeneity in the way perceived age discrimination changes over time. Conceptualizing age discrimination at work as a stressor, and integrating the model of exposure and reactivity to stressors with allostatic load theory, we examine changes in perceived age discrimination, along with its predictors and outcomes. We use a person- and target-centered approach with a nationally representative archival dataset from Switzerland (N = 1110) relying on a prospective design over seven years. Randomly splitting the sample into two (Half-samples A and B), we find three change patterns (i.e., increasing, decreasing, and stable nonexistent) of perceived age discrimination at work in Half-sample A. In Half-sample B, we replicated these three patterns and found that the heterogeneity in change patterns was predicted by employees' age and belief in a just world, but not neuroticism. We also observed that these change patterns were associated with job satisfaction, work strain, and perceived employability. We further discuss the theoretical and practical implications of these findings.

工作中的年龄歧视是对员工和组织产生有害影响的重大挑战。尽管年龄歧视理论表明,随着时间的推移,工人经历的年龄歧视程度越来越高,但先前的证据表明,年龄歧视随着时间的推移而变化的方式可能存在实质性的异质性。将工作中的年龄歧视概念化为压力源,并将压力源暴露和反应模型与适应负荷理论相结合,我们研究了感知年龄歧视的变化,以及它的预测因素和结果。我们采用以人为本和以目标为中心的方法,使用来自瑞士的具有全国代表性的档案数据集(N = 1110),依靠七年的前瞻性设计。我们将样本随机分成两个半样本A和半样本B,在半样本A中发现了三种变化模式(即增加、减少和稳定不存在),在半样本B中,我们复制了这三种模式,发现变化模式的异质性与员工的年龄和对公正世界的信念有关,而与神经质无关。我们还观察到,这些变化模式与工作满意度、工作压力和感知就业能力有关。我们进一步讨论了这些发现的理论和实践意义。
{"title":"Changes in perceived age discrimination over time: Patterns, predictors, and outcomes","authors":"Ariane Froidevaux,&nbsp;Yiduo Shao,&nbsp;Ieva Urbanaviciute,&nbsp;Serge da Motta Veiga,&nbsp;Mo Wang,&nbsp;Franciska Krings","doi":"10.1111/apps.70011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.70011","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Age discrimination at work represents a major challenge with detrimental impacts on employees and organizations. Although age discrimination theories suggest that workers experience increasing levels of age discrimination over time, prior evidence suggests that there may be substantial heterogeneity in the way perceived age discrimination changes over time. Conceptualizing age discrimination at work as a stressor, and integrating the model of exposure and reactivity to stressors with allostatic load theory, we examine changes in perceived age discrimination, along with its predictors and outcomes. We use a person- and target-centered approach with a nationally representative archival dataset from Switzerland (<i>N =</i> 1110) relying on a prospective design over seven years. Randomly splitting the sample into two (Half-samples A and B), we find three change patterns (i.e., increasing, decreasing, and stable nonexistent) of perceived age discrimination at work in Half-sample A. In Half-sample B, we replicated these three patterns and found that the heterogeneity in change patterns was predicted by employees' age and belief in a just world, but not neuroticism. We also observed that these change patterns were associated with job satisfaction, work strain, and perceived employability. We further discuss the theoretical and practical implications of these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":48289,"journal":{"name":"Applied Psychology-An International Review-Psychologie Appliquee-Revue Internationale","volume":"74 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143801306","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The role of identity leadership in promoting athletes' mental health: A cross-cultural study
IF 4.9 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Pub Date : 2025-04-04 DOI: 10.1111/apps.70008
Radhika Butalia, Filip Boen, S. Alexander Haslam, Stef Van Puyenbroeck, Loes Meeussen, Pete Coffee, Nasrin Biglari, Mark W. Bruner, Aashritta Chaudhary, Paweł Chmura, Alyson J. Crozier, Emma S. George, Swanaya Gurjar, Chris Hartley, Maciej Huzarski, Francisco M. Leo, Miguel A. López-Gajardo, Todd M. Loughead, Moe Machida-Kosuga, Colin D. McLaren, Seyed Reza Hosseini Nia, Matthew J. Slater, Katrien Fransen

Identity leadership is the process through which leaders create, advance, represent, and embed a sense of ‘we’ and ‘us’ (i.e., social identities) within the teams they lead. This paper extends the existing sports psychology literature by investigating the relationship between identity leadership and athletes' mental health, as mediated by team identification and social support. Additionally, the study explores the generalisability of these relationships across culturally diverse countries, as well as high and low-collectivistic cultures. To this end, we employed a large cross-sectional study design involving 2,861 athletes from 193 football (also known as soccer) teams across eight countries. Study results indicated that identity leadership on the part of coaches, team captains, and the best athlete leaders within the team was associated with greater feelings of ‘we-ness’ amongst athletes. This sense of ‘we-ness’ in turn correlated with athletes' increased perceptions of available social support for themselves and their team, ultimately contributing to enhanced well-being and reduced burnout. With some minor variation, these patterns were observed across all studied countries and across high and low-collectivistic cultures. In essence, identity leadership provided by coaches and athlete leaders was associated with better athlete mental health across geographical borders and cultures.

身份领导是领导者在他们领导的团队中创造、推进、代表和嵌入“我们”和“我们”(即社会身份)意识的过程。本文在现有运动心理学文献的基础上,以团队认同和社会支持为中介,研究认同领导与运动员心理健康的关系。此外,该研究还探讨了这些关系在文化多样性国家以及高集体主义文化和低集体主义文化中的普遍性。为此,我们采用了一项大型横断面研究设计,涉及来自八个国家193个足球队的2,861名运动员。研究结果表明,教练、队长和团队中最优秀的运动员领导的身份领导与运动员之间更大的“自我”感有关。这种“自我”感反过来又与运动员对自己和团队可获得的社会支持的感知增加相关,最终有助于提高幸福感,减少倦怠。除了一些小的差异,这些模式在所有被研究的国家以及高集体主义和低集体主义文化中都可以观察到。从本质上讲,教练和运动员领导者提供的身份领导与跨越地理边界和文化的运动员更好的心理健康有关。
{"title":"The role of identity leadership in promoting athletes' mental health: A cross-cultural study","authors":"Radhika Butalia,&nbsp;Filip Boen,&nbsp;S. Alexander Haslam,&nbsp;Stef Van Puyenbroeck,&nbsp;Loes Meeussen,&nbsp;Pete Coffee,&nbsp;Nasrin Biglari,&nbsp;Mark W. Bruner,&nbsp;Aashritta Chaudhary,&nbsp;Paweł Chmura,&nbsp;Alyson J. Crozier,&nbsp;Emma S. George,&nbsp;Swanaya Gurjar,&nbsp;Chris Hartley,&nbsp;Maciej Huzarski,&nbsp;Francisco M. Leo,&nbsp;Miguel A. López-Gajardo,&nbsp;Todd M. Loughead,&nbsp;Moe Machida-Kosuga,&nbsp;Colin D. McLaren,&nbsp;Seyed Reza Hosseini Nia,&nbsp;Matthew J. Slater,&nbsp;Katrien Fransen","doi":"10.1111/apps.70008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.70008","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Identity leadership is the process through which leaders create, advance, represent, and embed a sense of ‘we’ and ‘us’ (i.e., social identities) within the teams they lead. This paper extends the existing sports psychology literature by investigating the relationship between identity leadership and athletes' mental health, as mediated by team identification and social support. Additionally, the study explores the generalisability of these relationships across culturally diverse countries, as well as high and low-collectivistic cultures. To this end, we employed a large cross-sectional study design involving 2,861 athletes from 193 football (also known as soccer) teams across eight countries. Study results indicated that identity leadership on the part of coaches, team captains, and the best athlete leaders within the team was associated with greater feelings of ‘we-ness’ amongst athletes. This sense of ‘we-ness’ in turn correlated with athletes' increased perceptions of available social support for themselves and their team, ultimately contributing to enhanced well-being and reduced burnout. With some minor variation, these patterns were observed across all studied countries and across high and low-collectivistic cultures. In essence, identity leadership provided by coaches and athlete leaders was associated with better athlete mental health across geographical borders and cultures.</p>","PeriodicalId":48289,"journal":{"name":"Applied Psychology-An International Review-Psychologie Appliquee-Revue Internationale","volume":"74 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/apps.70008","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143770056","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The impact of human–animal interactions during micro-breaks on sleep quality and work engagement: A within-person approach
IF 4.9 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Pub Date : 2025-03-21 DOI: 10.1111/apps.70007
Ana Junça-Silva

This study draws on the Recovery Step Model and the Conservation of Resources (COR) theory to propose a framework that examines how and when sleep quality influences work engagement. Specifically, we tested a moderated mediation model where sleep quality predicts employees' work engagement through enhanced self-regulatory resources at the within-person level. Additionally, we investigated whether human–animal interactions (HAIs), during micro-breaks, moderate this indirect relationship. Overall, 155 teleworkers participated in a 10-day diary study (155*10 = 1550 measurement occasions). The multilevel analysis revealed that daily sleep quality positively predicted employees' work engagement by enhancing their self-regulatory resources. Moreover, this relationship was stronger for individuals who engaged in micro-breaks involving interactions with their companion animals. As the frequency of HAIs during micro-breaks increased, so did employees' levels of work engagement. These findings expand the recovery step model and the furr-recovery method by demonstrating that HAIs serve as beneficial micro-breaks during work hours, providing a restorative function that enhances work engagement. In sum, at least one HAI during the workday could have significant implications for employees' work engagement.

{"title":"The impact of human–animal interactions during micro-breaks on sleep quality and work engagement: A within-person approach","authors":"Ana Junça-Silva","doi":"10.1111/apps.70007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.70007","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study draws on the Recovery Step Model and the Conservation of Resources (COR) theory to propose a framework that examines how and when sleep quality influences work engagement. Specifically, we tested a moderated mediation model where sleep quality predicts employees' work engagement through enhanced self-regulatory resources at the within-person level. Additionally, we investigated whether human–animal interactions (HAIs), during micro-breaks, moderate this indirect relationship. Overall, 155 teleworkers participated in a 10-day diary study (155*10 = 1550 measurement occasions). The multilevel analysis revealed that daily sleep quality positively predicted employees' work engagement by enhancing their self-regulatory resources. Moreover, this relationship was stronger for individuals who engaged in micro-breaks involving interactions with their companion animals. As the frequency of HAIs during micro-breaks increased, so did employees' levels of work engagement. These findings expand the recovery step model and the furr-recovery method by demonstrating that HAIs serve as beneficial micro-breaks during work hours, providing a restorative function that enhances work engagement. In sum, at least one HAI during the workday could have significant implications for employees' work engagement.</p>","PeriodicalId":48289,"journal":{"name":"Applied Psychology-An International Review-Psychologie Appliquee-Revue Internationale","volume":"74 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143689348","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Prompting change: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the (un)confounded effects of prompts on pro-environmental behavior
IF 4.9 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Pub Date : 2025-03-19 DOI: 10.1111/apps.70003
Corinna Gemmecke, Clara Kühner, Hannes Zacher, Joachim Hüffmeier

Beyond political action, fostering individuals' pro-environmental behavior (PEB) is imperative to address environmental crises, such as climate change. Prompts are visual and/or verbal reminders to perform certain PEBs. Meta-analytic results by Osbaldiston and Schott (2012) suggest that prompts can increase PEB. However, in many of the included primary studies in this meta-analysis, prompts were confounded with other interventions (e.g., information campaigns). To study whether and under which conditions prompts have an unconfounded effect on PEB, we conducted a pre-registered systematic review following the PRISMA guidelines (N = 61 studies, k = 114 effect sizes). Additionally, we conducted a z-curve analysis to assess the expected replicability of the observed significant findings and ran meta-analyses to calculate the combined effect of (un)confounded prompt interventions on PEB. We find that prompts are effective in promoting PEB (b = 0.67, p < .001), even when no other interventions are implemented simultaneously (b = 0.66, p < .001). The rate of significant results that could be replicated under the same conditions as estimated by z-curve analysis is high (88% - 95% for unconfounded significant findings). Prompts are particularly effective in promoting resource conservation. The study setting and the PEB level prior to the prompt intervention moderate the effect of prompts on PEB. For example, the effect of prompts was stronger in universities, hotels, and public settings compared to work settings, and when initial PEB levels were lower.

{"title":"Prompting change: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the (un)confounded effects of prompts on pro-environmental behavior","authors":"Corinna Gemmecke,&nbsp;Clara Kühner,&nbsp;Hannes Zacher,&nbsp;Joachim Hüffmeier","doi":"10.1111/apps.70003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.70003","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Beyond political action, fostering individuals' pro-environmental behavior (PEB) is imperative to address environmental crises, such as climate change. Prompts are visual and/or verbal reminders to perform certain PEBs. Meta-analytic results by Osbaldiston and Schott (2012) suggest that prompts can increase PEB. However, in many of the included primary studies in this meta-analysis, prompts were confounded with other interventions (e.g., information campaigns). To study whether and under which conditions prompts have an unconfounded effect on PEB, we conducted a pre-registered systematic review following the PRISMA guidelines (<i>N</i> = 61 studies, <i>k</i> = 114 effect sizes). Additionally, we conducted a <i>z</i>-curve analysis to assess the expected replicability of the observed significant findings and ran meta-analyses to calculate the combined effect of (un)confounded prompt interventions on PEB. We find that prompts are effective in promoting PEB (<i>b</i> = 0.67, <i>p</i> &lt; .001), even when no other interventions are implemented simultaneously (<i>b</i> = 0.66, <i>p</i> &lt; .001). The rate of significant results that could be replicated under the same conditions as estimated by <i>z</i>-curve analysis is high (88% - 95% for unconfounded significant findings). Prompts are particularly effective in promoting resource conservation. The study setting and the PEB level prior to the prompt intervention moderate the effect of prompts on PEB. For example, the effect of prompts was stronger in universities, hotels, and public settings compared to work settings, and when initial PEB levels were lower.</p>","PeriodicalId":48289,"journal":{"name":"Applied Psychology-An International Review-Psychologie Appliquee-Revue Internationale","volume":"74 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/apps.70003","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143646252","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Insomnia and impulsive buying under abusive supervisors: Mediation of ego depletion and moderation of coworker support
IF 4.9 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Pub Date : 2025-03-13 DOI: 10.1111/apps.70005
Won-Moo Hur, Yuhyung Shin

Compared with the vast amount of research on the deleterious effects of abusive supervision on work outcomes, its effect on off-job behavior has received little scholarly attention. To bridge this gap, we examined the long-term effects of abusive supervision on subsequent insomnia and impulsive buying among frontline service employees (FSEs). We focused on the mediating roles of job insecurity and ego depletion, and the moderating roles of coworker emotional and instrumental support. To test our hypotheses, we collected three-wave data 3 months apart from 318 FSEs. As hypothesized, FSEs' experiences of abusive supervision significantly affected insomnia and impulsive buying 6 months later. Job insecurity and ego depletion sequentially mediated these relationships. Although coworker emotional support mitigated the deleterious effects of abusive supervision on insomnia and impulsive buying through job insecurity and ego depletion, coworker instrumental support aggravated these effects. These findings contribute to the literature by providing novel insights into the role of abusive supervision in maladaptive off-job behavior and its boundary conditions.

{"title":"Insomnia and impulsive buying under abusive supervisors: Mediation of ego depletion and moderation of coworker support","authors":"Won-Moo Hur,&nbsp;Yuhyung Shin","doi":"10.1111/apps.70005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.70005","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Compared with the vast amount of research on the deleterious effects of abusive supervision on work outcomes, its effect on off-job behavior has received little scholarly attention. To bridge this gap, we examined the long-term effects of abusive supervision on subsequent insomnia and impulsive buying among frontline service employees (FSEs). We focused on the mediating roles of job insecurity and ego depletion, and the moderating roles of coworker emotional and instrumental support. To test our hypotheses, we collected three-wave data 3 months apart from 318 FSEs. As hypothesized, FSEs' experiences of abusive supervision significantly affected insomnia and impulsive buying 6 months later. Job insecurity and ego depletion sequentially mediated these relationships. Although coworker emotional support mitigated the deleterious effects of abusive supervision on insomnia and impulsive buying through job insecurity and ego depletion, coworker instrumental support aggravated these effects. These findings contribute to the literature by providing novel insights into the role of abusive supervision in maladaptive off-job behavior and its boundary conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":48289,"journal":{"name":"Applied Psychology-An International Review-Psychologie Appliquee-Revue Internationale","volume":"74 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143622620","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Applied Psychology-An International Review-Psychologie Appliquee-Revue Internationale
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1