Does the welfare regime impact the telework gender stress gap?

IF 4.5 3区 管理学 Q1 ERGONOMICS New Technology Work and Employment Pub Date : 2024-01-03 DOI:10.1111/ntwe.12287
Alain Klarsfeld, Kevin Carillo, Gaëlle Cachat-Rosset, Tania Saba, Josianne Marsan
{"title":"Does the welfare regime impact the telework gender stress gap?","authors":"Alain Klarsfeld, Kevin Carillo, Gaëlle Cachat-Rosset, Tania Saba, Josianne Marsan","doi":"10.1111/ntwe.12287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"After decades of slow diffusion, the acceptance of telework has dramatically accelerated during the pandemic crisis, becoming a mainstream work practice. However, little is still known on the impact of telework design on employee stress, particularly when stress is high due to a major health crisis, at a time when it is crucial that organizations help buffer it. Using the welfare regime literature, we study the effects of telework demands/resources factors on stress and the moderating effects of gender in more or less egalitarian welfare regimes, during a pandemic crisis. Analyzing data collected from 4602 respondents in France and Quebec, we find that telework demands (family interference with work, organizational isolation, emotional isolation) impact stress positively in both welfare regimes. We also find that the gender stress gap is higher in a more gender-inegalitarian welfare regime than in a more gender-egalitarian welfare regime. Men's and women's stress is not impacted in the same manner in the two contexts studies. Contributions to research and practice are discussed, along with limitations and potential future research avenues.","PeriodicalId":51550,"journal":{"name":"New Technology Work and Employment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Technology Work and Employment","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12287","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

After decades of slow diffusion, the acceptance of telework has dramatically accelerated during the pandemic crisis, becoming a mainstream work practice. However, little is still known on the impact of telework design on employee stress, particularly when stress is high due to a major health crisis, at a time when it is crucial that organizations help buffer it. Using the welfare regime literature, we study the effects of telework demands/resources factors on stress and the moderating effects of gender in more or less egalitarian welfare regimes, during a pandemic crisis. Analyzing data collected from 4602 respondents in France and Quebec, we find that telework demands (family interference with work, organizational isolation, emotional isolation) impact stress positively in both welfare regimes. We also find that the gender stress gap is higher in a more gender-inegalitarian welfare regime than in a more gender-egalitarian welfare regime. Men's and women's stress is not impacted in the same manner in the two contexts studies. Contributions to research and practice are discussed, along with limitations and potential future research avenues.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
福利制度会影响远程工作的性别压力差距吗?
经过几十年的缓慢推广,远程工作的接受程度在大流行病危机期间急剧加快,成为一种主流工作方式。然而,人们对远程工作设计对员工压力的影响仍然知之甚少,尤其是在因重大健康危机而导致压力高涨的时候,而此时组织帮助缓冲压力至关重要。我们利用福利制度文献,研究了在大流行病危机期间,远程工作需求/资源因素对压力的影响,以及在平等或不平等福利制度下性别的调节作用。通过分析从法国和魁北克省 4602 名受访者那里收集到的数据,我们发现远程工作需求(家庭对工作的干扰、组织隔离、情感隔离)对两种福利制度下的压力都有积极影响。我们还发现,在性别平等程度较高的福利制度下,性别压力差距比在性别平等程度较高的福利制度下更大。在两种背景研究中,男性和女性的压力受到的影响并不相同。本研究讨论了对研究和实践的贡献,以及局限性和未来潜在的研究途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
15.50%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: New Technology, Work and Employment presents analysis of the changing contours of technological and organisational systems and processes in order to encourage an enhanced and critical understanding of the dimensions of technological change in the workplace and in employment more generally. The journal is eclectic and invites contributions from across the social sciences, with the primary focus on critical and non-managerial approaches to the subject. It has the aim of publishing papers from perspectives concerned with the changing nature of new technology and workplace and employment relations. The objective of the journal is to promote deeper understanding through conceptual debate firmly rooted in analysis of current practices and sociotechnical change.
期刊最新文献
How to do HRM with numbers? A performative lens on HR metrics, HR analytics and HR algorithms Framing algorithmic management: Constructed antagonism on HR technology websites A tale of two platforms: Habitus as the structuring force of gig workers' experience How education professionals manage personal and professional boundaries when using social technologies ‘Everything now, all the time’: The connectivity paradox and gender equality in the legal profession
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1