Are religion metaphors anti‑revolutionary?

Pub Date : 2024-01-09 DOI:10.1075/msw.23017.aug
Anaïs Augé
{"title":"Are religion metaphors anti‑revolutionary?","authors":"Anaïs Augé","doi":"10.1075/msw.23017.aug","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper investigates the socio-political implications of sceptical metaphors in French discourse about the\n climate crisis. Existing literature has demonstrated the prevalence of religion metaphors in English sceptical discourse.\n Yet, in France, religious references in language use are limited as such references have been considered “anti-revolutionary”\n since the storming of the Bastille, in 1789. I thus ask to what extent sceptical metaphors in French climate crisis discourse\n differ from English sceptical metaphors. To this aim, I conduct a corpus-based study relying on texts published in the\n extreme-right wing French newspaper “Valeurs Actuelles”. The metaphors identified in this corpus are analysed so as to uncover the\n mini-narratives related to sceptical metaphor scenarios. Consistent with existing literature, the analysis establishes the\n prevalence of the religion scenario. However, the research highlights significant argumentative exploitations: metaphor\n users define the source concept according to cultural viewpoints on religion and ideological understanding of the\n religious lexicon. I demonstrate that religion metaphors prevail because associated source concepts (environmentalism\n as islam) are not conceived as being part of the domain of religion, according to these (extreme-right-wing)\n discourse producers.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.23017.aug","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper investigates the socio-political implications of sceptical metaphors in French discourse about the climate crisis. Existing literature has demonstrated the prevalence of religion metaphors in English sceptical discourse. Yet, in France, religious references in language use are limited as such references have been considered “anti-revolutionary” since the storming of the Bastille, in 1789. I thus ask to what extent sceptical metaphors in French climate crisis discourse differ from English sceptical metaphors. To this aim, I conduct a corpus-based study relying on texts published in the extreme-right wing French newspaper “Valeurs Actuelles”. The metaphors identified in this corpus are analysed so as to uncover the mini-narratives related to sceptical metaphor scenarios. Consistent with existing literature, the analysis establishes the prevalence of the religion scenario. However, the research highlights significant argumentative exploitations: metaphor users define the source concept according to cultural viewpoints on religion and ideological understanding of the religious lexicon. I demonstrate that religion metaphors prevail because associated source concepts (environmentalism as islam) are not conceived as being part of the domain of religion, according to these (extreme-right-wing) discourse producers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
宗教隐喻是反革命的吗?
本文研究了法国有关气候危机的言论中怀疑论隐喻的社会政治含义。现有文献表明,宗教隐喻在英语怀疑论话语中十分普遍。然而,在法国,宗教隐喻在语言使用中受到限制,因为自 1789 年巴士底狱被攻破以来,宗教隐喻一直被认为是 "反革命 "的。因此,我想知道法国气候危机话语中的怀疑隐喻与英语中的怀疑隐喻在多大程度上有所不同。为此,我以法国极右翼报纸《Valeurs Actuelles》上发表的文章为基础,开展了一项语料库研究。通过分析该语料库中的隐喻,揭示了与怀疑隐喻情景相关的微型叙事。与现有文献一致,分析确定了宗教情景的普遍性。然而,研究强调了重要的论证利用:隐喻使用者根据对宗教的文化观点和对宗教词汇的意识形态理解来定义来源概念。我的研究表明,宗教隐喻之所以盛行,是因为根据这些(极右翼)话语生产者的观点,相关的源概念(作为伊斯兰教的环保主义)并不属于宗教范畴。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1