Understanding the Challenges Associated with Approval of Anticancer Products to Facilitate the Regulatory Approvals: A Cross-sectional Study

Pinky Sharma, V. Jhawat, Jatinder Singh, Rohit Dutt
{"title":"Understanding the Challenges Associated with Approval of Anticancer\nProducts to Facilitate the Regulatory Approvals: A Cross-sectional Study","authors":"Pinky Sharma, V. Jhawat, Jatinder Singh, Rohit Dutt","doi":"10.2174/0115733947273426231128054645","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nOncological medications face a myriad of challenges, including technological,\npre-clinical, clinical, and manufacturing, that lead to regulatory approval delays or failures. The present\nstudy aims to identify some challenges encountered by researchers or regulators during the development\nof novel cancer therapies.\n\n\n\nThe present cross-sectional observational study used a mixed-method design methodology.\nThe participants were selected via a non-random sampling method via self-selection and snowballing\napproach. A survey questionnaire was developed and circulated among the selected participants as a\nhard copy or email or a Google form. Open-ended and closed-ended questions were incorporated to\nidentify the regulatory challenges faced during oncology drug development. The responses were collected\nfrom September 2021 to June 2022. These responses were then coded and themes were identified\nfor the challenges.\n\n\n\nA total of 87 responses were obtained for the questionnaire among the individuals contacted.\nSeven themes were identified from the collated responses that depicted the challenges for the regulatory\napproval of anticancer drug products. The majority of responders (38.2%) suggested reduced\napproval time whereas endpoint selection and study design were considered as a challenge by 12.0%\nof responders each. Furthermore, 6.0% of responders admit that timely interaction with the regulators\nis also a challenge that delays approval. Many challenges also exist during the product development\nphase; hence, 12.0% of responders reported safety issues, and 22.0% of responders reported technical\nissues during manufacturing as the cause of regulatory failure. Moreover, 12.0% of responders suggested\nthe need for improvements in regulatory guidelines for oncology drug development.\n\n\n\nThe survey indicates a lack of Indian guidelines for anticancer products, whereas limited\nguidance is available from other countries such as Europe or the United States. Thus, the survey\npoints to the necessity for improvement in the regulatory guidelines and drug approval process to address\nthe challenges unique to cancer drug development.\n","PeriodicalId":43754,"journal":{"name":"Current Cancer Therapy Reviews","volume":"23 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Cancer Therapy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0115733947273426231128054645","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Oncological medications face a myriad of challenges, including technological, pre-clinical, clinical, and manufacturing, that lead to regulatory approval delays or failures. The present study aims to identify some challenges encountered by researchers or regulators during the development of novel cancer therapies. The present cross-sectional observational study used a mixed-method design methodology. The participants were selected via a non-random sampling method via self-selection and snowballing approach. A survey questionnaire was developed and circulated among the selected participants as a hard copy or email or a Google form. Open-ended and closed-ended questions were incorporated to identify the regulatory challenges faced during oncology drug development. The responses were collected from September 2021 to June 2022. These responses were then coded and themes were identified for the challenges. A total of 87 responses were obtained for the questionnaire among the individuals contacted. Seven themes were identified from the collated responses that depicted the challenges for the regulatory approval of anticancer drug products. The majority of responders (38.2%) suggested reduced approval time whereas endpoint selection and study design were considered as a challenge by 12.0% of responders each. Furthermore, 6.0% of responders admit that timely interaction with the regulators is also a challenge that delays approval. Many challenges also exist during the product development phase; hence, 12.0% of responders reported safety issues, and 22.0% of responders reported technical issues during manufacturing as the cause of regulatory failure. Moreover, 12.0% of responders suggested the need for improvements in regulatory guidelines for oncology drug development. The survey indicates a lack of Indian guidelines for anticancer products, whereas limited guidance is available from other countries such as Europe or the United States. Thus, the survey points to the necessity for improvement in the regulatory guidelines and drug approval process to address the challenges unique to cancer drug development.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
了解与抗癌产品审批相关的挑战以促进监管审批:横断面研究
肿瘤药物面临着包括技术、临床前、临床和生产在内的无数挑战,这些挑战导致了监管审批的延误或失败。本研究旨在确定研究人员或监管机构在开发新型癌症疗法过程中遇到的一些挑战。本横断面观察性研究采用混合方法设计法,通过自我选择和滚雪球的方法,以非随机抽样的方式选取参与者。我们编制了一份调查问卷,并以硬拷贝、电子邮件或谷歌表格的形式在被选中的参与者中分发。问卷中包含开放式和封闭式问题,以确定肿瘤药物开发过程中面临的监管挑战。答复收集时间为 2021 年 9 月至 2022 年 6 月。从整理出的答复中确定了七个主题,描述了抗癌药物产品审批监管面临的挑战。大多数答复者(38.2%)建议缩短审批时间,而终点选择和研究设计分别被 12.0% 的答复者视为挑战。此外,6.0% 的受访者承认,与监管机构的及时互动也是延误审批的一个挑战。在产品开发阶段也存在许多挑战;因此,12.0% 的应答者表示安全问题和 22.0% 的应答者表示生产过程中的技术问题是监管失败的原因。此外,12.0% 的受访者认为需要改进肿瘤药物开发的监管指南。调查显示,印度缺乏抗癌产品的指南,而欧洲或美国等其他国家提供的指南有限。因此,调查指出有必要改进监管指南和药物审批流程,以应对癌症药物开发所面临的独特挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: Current Cancer Therapy Reviews publishes frontier reviews on all the latest advances in clinical oncology, cancer therapy and pharmacology. The journal"s aim is to publish the highest quality review articles dedicated to clinical research in the field. The journal is essential reading for all researchers and clinicians in cancer therapy.
期刊最新文献
Understanding the Challenges Associated with Approval of Anticancer Products to Facilitate the Regulatory Approvals: A Cross-sectional Study Bibliometric Analysis to Improve Combined Treatment Strategies for Glioblastoma in America Odor generation pattern of swine manure according to the processing form of feed. Childhood Heart Tumors: Detection, Diagnosis, and Treatments Metformin (The Miracle Drug) Kinetics in Different Diseases such as Cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1