Under the weight of heavy tails: A power law perspective on the emergence of outliers in entrepreneurship

Q1 Business, Management and Accounting Journal of Business Venturing Insights Pub Date : 2024-01-16 DOI:10.1016/j.jbvi.2023.e00447
G. Christopher Crawford , Harry Joo , Herman Aguinis
{"title":"Under the weight of heavy tails: A power law perspective on the emergence of outliers in entrepreneurship","authors":"G. Christopher Crawford ,&nbsp;Harry Joo ,&nbsp;Herman Aguinis","doi":"10.1016/j.jbvi.2023.e00447","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A fundamental discovery in entrepreneurship is that firm outcomes do not follow a symmetrical Gaussian curve. Instead, most are heavily right-skewed distributions in which a few extreme outliers (e.g., rock star firms like Airbnb, Tesla, and Uber) account for a disproportionate amount of the output. Although past research usually described outcome distributions as shaped following the power law, our study asks the following question: <em>What other less extreme distributions of generalizable firm outcomes exist in entrepreneurship?</em> Our investigation leverages four representative datasets from the U.S., Europe, and Australia, comprising 32 samples with about 22,000 ventures. We implemented a precise data-analytic approach that compares each sample (i.e., empirical distribution) against multiple theoretical distribution shapes to identify the best fit. Results showed that, across nearly all samples, the pure power law was not the dominant distribution. Instead, the annual revenue distribution is shaped as a power law with an exponential cutoff, and the number of employees distribution is shaped lognormally. Combined, these suggest the existence of top-down limitations on the highest performing firms. Accordingly, we offer an agenda for future research focused on (a) identifying and releasing systemic constraints, (b) examining and falsifying the underlying generative mechanisms that cause the emergence of heavy-tailed distributions and the outliers therein, and (c) conducting multi-level, mixed-method studies to investigate how micro-level interactions aggregate into macro-level heavy-tailed distributions. Our paper makes significant contributions to the power law perspective and future efforts to explain and predict the emergence of rock star firms in entrepreneurship.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38078,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Venturing Insights","volume":"21 ","pages":"Article e00447"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Venturing Insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352673423000768","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A fundamental discovery in entrepreneurship is that firm outcomes do not follow a symmetrical Gaussian curve. Instead, most are heavily right-skewed distributions in which a few extreme outliers (e.g., rock star firms like Airbnb, Tesla, and Uber) account for a disproportionate amount of the output. Although past research usually described outcome distributions as shaped following the power law, our study asks the following question: What other less extreme distributions of generalizable firm outcomes exist in entrepreneurship? Our investigation leverages four representative datasets from the U.S., Europe, and Australia, comprising 32 samples with about 22,000 ventures. We implemented a precise data-analytic approach that compares each sample (i.e., empirical distribution) against multiple theoretical distribution shapes to identify the best fit. Results showed that, across nearly all samples, the pure power law was not the dominant distribution. Instead, the annual revenue distribution is shaped as a power law with an exponential cutoff, and the number of employees distribution is shaped lognormally. Combined, these suggest the existence of top-down limitations on the highest performing firms. Accordingly, we offer an agenda for future research focused on (a) identifying and releasing systemic constraints, (b) examining and falsifying the underlying generative mechanisms that cause the emergence of heavy-tailed distributions and the outliers therein, and (c) conducting multi-level, mixed-method studies to investigate how micro-level interactions aggregate into macro-level heavy-tailed distributions. Our paper makes significant contributions to the power law perspective and future efforts to explain and predict the emergence of rock star firms in entrepreneurship.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在沉重尾部的重压下:从幂律角度看创业中异常值的出现
创业学的一个基本发现是,企业成果并不遵循对称的高斯曲线。相反,大多数企业的结果呈严重右偏分布,其中少数极端异常值(如 Airbnb、特斯拉和优步等摇滚明星企业)在产出中所占比例过大。尽管过去的研究通常将结果分布描述为幂律形状,但我们的研究提出了以下问题:在创业过程中,还存在哪些不那么极端的可推广企业成果分布?我们的研究利用了来自美国、欧洲和澳大利亚的四个代表性数据集,共 32 个样本,约 22,000 个企业。我们采用了一种精确的数据分析方法,将每个样本(即经验分布)与多种理论分布形状进行比较,以确定最合适的分布形状。结果表明,在几乎所有样本中,纯幂律分布并不占主导地位。相反,年收入分布呈指数截止的幂律分布,员工人数分布呈对数正态分布。综合来看,这些都表明业绩最好的公司存在自上而下的限制。因此,我们为未来的研究提出了一个议程,重点是:(a)识别和释放系统性限制;(b)研究和证伪导致重尾分布及其中异常值出现的潜在生成机制;以及(c)开展多层次、混合方法研究,以调查微观层面的相互作用是如何聚合成宏观层面的重尾分布的。我们的论文为幂律视角以及未来解释和预测创业中摇滚明星企业的出现做出了重要贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Business Venturing Insights
Journal of Business Venturing Insights Business, Management and Accounting-Business and International Management
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
审稿时长
28 days
期刊最新文献
Empirical entrepreneurial ecosystem research: A guide to creating multilevel datasets The myth of entrepreneurship as a tool: Reorienting business venturing as a goal in itself in a post-growth society Self-employment and inflammation in older adults: Examining biomarkers in the survey of health, ageing and retirement in Europe Not all leavers are equal: How rank and destination influence enforcement of restrictive covenants How sector fluidity (knowledge-intensiveness and innovation) shapes startups’ resilience during crises
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1