Effects of past mating behavior versus past ejaculation on male mate choice and male attractiveness

IF 2.5 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Behavioral Ecology Pub Date : 2024-01-17 DOI:10.1093/beheco/arae002
Meng-Han Joseph Chung, Megan L Head, Rebecca J Fox, Michael D Jennions
{"title":"Effects of past mating behavior versus past ejaculation on male mate choice and male attractiveness","authors":"Meng-Han Joseph Chung, Megan L Head, Rebecca J Fox, Michael D Jennions","doi":"10.1093/beheco/arae002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Past reproductive effort allows males to assess their ability to acquire mates, but it also consumes resources that can reduce their future competitive ability. Few studies have examined how a male’s reproductive history affects his subsequent mate choice; and, to date, no study has determined the relative contribution of past mating behavior and past ejaculate production because these two forms of investment are naturally highly correlated. Here, we disentangled the relative effects of past mating behavior and past ejaculate production in mosquitofish (Gambusia holbrooki) by experimentally preventing some males from ejaculating when trying to mate. We assessed the effect of mating behavior on mate choice by comparing males that had previously been with or without access to females and male rivals for 8 and 16 weeks; and assessed the effect of ejaculation on mate choice by comparing males that either could or could not ejaculate when they had access to females for 16 weeks. Reproductive treatment did not affect male attractiveness, but it did affect male mate choice. Somewhat surprisingly, in 5 of the 6 treatment-age at testing combinations, males preferred a female in the vicinity of a male rival over a solitary female. This preference was marginally stronger for males that had previously engaged in mating behavior but was unaffected by past ejaculate production. We discuss the potential benefits to males of associating with another male when seeking mates. This is the first study to quantify the relative influence of pre- and post-copulatory reproductive investment on male mate choice.","PeriodicalId":8840,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Ecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arae002","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Past reproductive effort allows males to assess their ability to acquire mates, but it also consumes resources that can reduce their future competitive ability. Few studies have examined how a male’s reproductive history affects his subsequent mate choice; and, to date, no study has determined the relative contribution of past mating behavior and past ejaculate production because these two forms of investment are naturally highly correlated. Here, we disentangled the relative effects of past mating behavior and past ejaculate production in mosquitofish (Gambusia holbrooki) by experimentally preventing some males from ejaculating when trying to mate. We assessed the effect of mating behavior on mate choice by comparing males that had previously been with or without access to females and male rivals for 8 and 16 weeks; and assessed the effect of ejaculation on mate choice by comparing males that either could or could not ejaculate when they had access to females for 16 weeks. Reproductive treatment did not affect male attractiveness, but it did affect male mate choice. Somewhat surprisingly, in 5 of the 6 treatment-age at testing combinations, males preferred a female in the vicinity of a male rival over a solitary female. This preference was marginally stronger for males that had previously engaged in mating behavior but was unaffected by past ejaculate production. We discuss the potential benefits to males of associating with another male when seeking mates. This is the first study to quantify the relative influence of pre- and post-copulatory reproductive investment on male mate choice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
过去的交配行为与过去的射精行为对雄性交配选择和雄性吸引力的影响
过去的繁殖努力可以让雄性评估自己获得配偶的能力,但同时也会消耗资源,降低它们未来的竞争能力。很少有研究探讨雄性的繁殖史如何影响其随后的配偶选择;迄今为止,还没有研究确定过去的交配行为和过去的射精量的相对贡献,因为这两种形式的投资自然是高度相关的。在这里,我们通过实验阻止一些雄性在试图交配时射精,从而厘清了蚊子鱼(Gambusia holbrooki)过去的交配行为和过去的射精量的相对影响。我们通过比较雄鱼在8周和16周内有无机会接触雌鱼和雄性竞争者,评估了交配行为对配偶选择的影响;通过比较雄鱼在16周内有无机会接触雌鱼,评估了射精对配偶选择的影响。生殖处理并不影响雄性的吸引力,但却影响雄性的配偶选择。有点令人惊讶的是,在6种处理-测试年龄组合中,有5种雄性更喜欢雄性对手附近的雌性,而不是独处的雌性。对于之前有过交配行为的雄性来说,这种偏好稍强,但并不受过去射精量的影响。我们讨论了雄性在寻找配偶时与另一雄性交往的潜在益处。这是第一项量化雄性交配前和交配后生殖投资对雄性配偶选择的相对影响的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Behavioral Ecology
Behavioral Ecology 环境科学-动物学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
93
审稿时长
3.0 months
期刊介绍: Studies on the whole range of behaving organisms, including plants, invertebrates, vertebrates, and humans, are included. Behavioral Ecology construes the field in its broadest sense to include 1) the use of ecological and evolutionary processes to explain the occurrence and adaptive significance of behavior patterns; 2) the use of behavioral processes to predict ecological patterns, and 3) empirical, comparative analyses relating behavior to the environment in which it occurs.
期刊最新文献
Neighbors affect vocal behavior of tropical wrens: a multi-speaker density-manipulation experiment A test of the mechanistic process behind the convergent agonistic character displacement hypothesis. Sex-specific manipulation of sexually cannibalistic mantid mating behavior by hairworms Are weapon allometries steeper in major or minor males? A meta-analysis Acoustic effects complement visual displays of Great Bowerbird bowers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1