Discrepancies between observation and ERA5 reanalysis in the Amazon deforestation context: A case study

IF 1.9 4区 地球科学 Q2 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS Dynamics of Atmospheres and Oceans Pub Date : 2024-01-18 DOI:10.1016/j.dynatmoce.2024.101442
Queren Priscila da Silva , Demerval Soares Moreira , Helber Custódio de Freitas , Leonardo Moreno Domingues
{"title":"Discrepancies between observation and ERA5 reanalysis in the Amazon deforestation context: A case study","authors":"Queren Priscila da Silva ,&nbsp;Demerval Soares Moreira ,&nbsp;Helber Custódio de Freitas ,&nbsp;Leonardo Moreno Domingues","doi":"10.1016/j.dynatmoce.2024.101442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Deforestation<span><span> in tropical areas is broadly reported to change the climate both locally and regionally. Warmer and drier conditions, as well as changes in precipitation patterns, are linked to deforestation in the Amazon. In this study, we identified two areas of distinct land use in Amazon: a preserved native forest and an increasingly deforested region southward. Due to the scarcity of available ground data, we propose assessing the impacts of deforestation on surface climate using two different datasets: a station-based reference product and the </span>ERA5 reanalysis. However, as ERA5 does not include a recent and dynamic land use map in its development, an additional goal is to evaluate the potential discrepancies in the reanalysis for not accounting for these changes. Despite some consistent and similar patterns in relative humidity and low intensity (9th decile) precipitation, our results show, indeed, different trends among the datasets, with reference trends always more accentuated than in the reanalysis. Despite being broadly used in numerous studies, reanalysis data under intensive </span></span>land use change and ungauged areas need to be used with caution to avoid inconclusive or misleading findings.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50563,"journal":{"name":"Dynamics of Atmospheres and Oceans","volume":"106 ","pages":"Article 101442"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dynamics of Atmospheres and Oceans","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377026524000101","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Deforestation in tropical areas is broadly reported to change the climate both locally and regionally. Warmer and drier conditions, as well as changes in precipitation patterns, are linked to deforestation in the Amazon. In this study, we identified two areas of distinct land use in Amazon: a preserved native forest and an increasingly deforested region southward. Due to the scarcity of available ground data, we propose assessing the impacts of deforestation on surface climate using two different datasets: a station-based reference product and the ERA5 reanalysis. However, as ERA5 does not include a recent and dynamic land use map in its development, an additional goal is to evaluate the potential discrepancies in the reanalysis for not accounting for these changes. Despite some consistent and similar patterns in relative humidity and low intensity (9th decile) precipitation, our results show, indeed, different trends among the datasets, with reference trends always more accentuated than in the reanalysis. Despite being broadly used in numerous studies, reanalysis data under intensive land use change and ungauged areas need to be used with caution to avoid inconclusive or misleading findings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
亚马逊森林砍伐背景下观测数据与ERA5再分析数据之间的差异:案例研究
据广泛报道,热带地区的森林砍伐会改变当地和区域的气候。亚马逊地区气候变暖、干旱以及降水模式的变化都与森林砍伐有关。在这项研究中,我们确定了亚马逊地区两个截然不同的土地利用区域:一个是保留下来的原始森林,另一个是向南日益遭到砍伐的地区。由于可用的地面数据稀缺,我们建议使用两种不同的数据集来评估森林砍伐对地表气候的影响:基于站点的参考产品和ERA5再分析。不过,由于ERA5 在开发过程中没有包含最新的动态土地利用图,因此我们的另一个目标是评估再分析中未考虑这些变化的潜在差异。尽管在相对湿度和低强度(第 9 个十分位)降水量方面存在一些一致和相似的模式,但我们的结果显示,不同数据集之间的趋势确实不同,参考趋势总是比再分析更突出。尽管再分析数据在许多研究中被广泛使用,但在土地利用剧烈变化和无测站地区仍需谨慎使用,以避免得出不确定或误导性的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Dynamics of Atmospheres and Oceans
Dynamics of Atmospheres and Oceans 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
43
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Dynamics of Atmospheres and Oceans is an international journal for research related to the dynamical and physical processes governing atmospheres, oceans and climate. Authors are invited to submit articles, short contributions or scholarly reviews in the following areas: •Dynamic meteorology •Physical oceanography •Geophysical fluid dynamics •Climate variability and climate change •Atmosphere-ocean-biosphere-cryosphere interactions •Prediction and predictability •Scale interactions Papers of theoretical, computational, experimental and observational investigations are invited, particularly those that explore the fundamental nature - or bring together the interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary aspects - of dynamical and physical processes at all scales. Papers that explore air-sea interactions and the coupling between atmospheres, oceans, and other components of the climate system are particularly welcome.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Corrigendum to “Effects of equatorially-confined shear flow on MRG and Rossby waves” [Dyn. Atmos. Oceans 100 (2022) 101331] Multi-timescale variability of tropical convection in the Indo-western Pacific Ocean Impact of boundary layer parameterizations on simulated seasonal meteorology over North-East India Mapping the dynamics of global sea surface nitrate using ocean color data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1