Adaptive Bayesian information borrowing methods for finding and optimizing subgroup-specific doses.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Clinical Trials Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-19 DOI:10.1177/17407745231212193
Jingyi Zhang, Ruitao Lin, Xin Chen, Fangrong Yan
{"title":"Adaptive Bayesian information borrowing methods for finding and optimizing subgroup-specific doses.","authors":"Jingyi Zhang, Ruitao Lin, Xin Chen, Fangrong Yan","doi":"10.1177/17407745231212193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In precision oncology, integrating multiple cancer patient subgroups into a single master protocol allows for the simultaneous assessment of treatment effects in these subgroups and promotes the sharing of information between them, ultimately reducing sample sizes and costs and enhancing scientific validity. However, the safety and efficacy of these therapies may vary across different subgroups, resulting in heterogeneous outcomes. Therefore, identifying subgroup-specific optimal doses in early-phase clinical trials is crucial for the development of future trials. In this article, we review various innovative Bayesian information-borrowing strategies that aim to determine and optimize subgroup-specific doses. Specifically, we discuss Bayesian hierarchical modeling, Bayesian clustering, Bayesian model averaging or selection, pairwise borrowing, and other relevant approaches. By employing these Bayesian information-borrowing methods, investigators can gain a better understanding of the intricate relationships between dose, toxicity, and efficacy in each subgroup. This increased understanding significantly improves the chances of identifying an optimal dose tailored to each specific subgroup. Furthermore, we present several practical recommendations to guide the design of future early-phase oncology trials involving multiple subgroups when using the Bayesian information-borrowing methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":10685,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Trials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11132956/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17407745231212193","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In precision oncology, integrating multiple cancer patient subgroups into a single master protocol allows for the simultaneous assessment of treatment effects in these subgroups and promotes the sharing of information between them, ultimately reducing sample sizes and costs and enhancing scientific validity. However, the safety and efficacy of these therapies may vary across different subgroups, resulting in heterogeneous outcomes. Therefore, identifying subgroup-specific optimal doses in early-phase clinical trials is crucial for the development of future trials. In this article, we review various innovative Bayesian information-borrowing strategies that aim to determine and optimize subgroup-specific doses. Specifically, we discuss Bayesian hierarchical modeling, Bayesian clustering, Bayesian model averaging or selection, pairwise borrowing, and other relevant approaches. By employing these Bayesian information-borrowing methods, investigators can gain a better understanding of the intricate relationships between dose, toxicity, and efficacy in each subgroup. This increased understanding significantly improves the chances of identifying an optimal dose tailored to each specific subgroup. Furthermore, we present several practical recommendations to guide the design of future early-phase oncology trials involving multiple subgroups when using the Bayesian information-borrowing methods.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自适应贝叶斯信息借用法,用于寻找和优化亚组特异性剂量。
在精准肿瘤学中,将多个癌症患者亚组整合到一个主方案中,可以同时评估这些亚组的治疗效果,并促进它们之间的信息共享,最终减少样本量和成本,提高科学有效性。然而,这些疗法在不同亚组中的安全性和疗效可能会有所不同,从而导致不同的结果。因此,在早期临床试验中确定针对亚组的最佳剂量对未来试验的发展至关重要。在本文中,我们回顾了旨在确定和优化亚组特异性剂量的各种创新贝叶斯信息借用策略。具体而言,我们讨论了贝叶斯分层建模、贝叶斯聚类、贝叶斯模型平均或选择、配对借用以及其他相关方法。通过采用这些贝叶斯信息借用方法,研究人员可以更好地了解各亚组中剂量、毒性和疗效之间错综复杂的关系。这种理解的加深大大提高了为每个特定亚组确定最佳剂量的机会。此外,我们还提出了几项实用建议,以指导未来使用贝叶斯信息借用方法设计涉及多个亚组的早期肿瘤学试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Trials
Clinical Trials 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
3.70%
发文量
82
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Trials is dedicated to advancing knowledge on the design and conduct of clinical trials related research methodologies. Covering the design, conduct, analysis, synthesis and evaluation of key methodologies, the journal remains on the cusp of the latest topics, including ethics, regulation and policy impact.
期刊最新文献
Proceedings of the University of Pennsylvania 15th annual conference on statistical issues in clinical trials: Advances in time-to-event analyses in clinical trials-challenges and opportunities. Participant’s treatment guesses and adverse events in back pain trials: Nocebo in action? 15th Annual University of Pennsylvania conference on statistical issues in clinical trial/advances in time to event analyses in clinical trials (morning panel discussion). Estimands in clinical trials of complex disease processes. Commentary on Astrachan et al. The transmutation of research risk in pragmatic clinical trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1