Balancing User Privacy and Legal Demands while Conducting Businesses on the Blockchain

Wezi Bonono Chipeta, Abdullahi Adaviriku Malik
{"title":"Balancing User Privacy and Legal Demands while Conducting Businesses on the Blockchain","authors":"Wezi Bonono Chipeta, Abdullahi Adaviriku Malik","doi":"10.47670/wuwijar202481wbcaam","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Blockchain technology offers a promising way to improve business processes by providing a secure and transparent transaction platform. However, using this technology brings its own set of challenges, especially when trying to balance user privacy with legal and regulatory needs. This article explores the challenges of keeping user information private, adhering to regulatory frameworks, and fulfilling legal requirements on the blockchain. A key point in this research is the challenge of keeping or maintaining confidentiality while being transparent. The article also discusses the issues of applying legal rules to a system not controlled by one central authority, the risks of privacy and security breaches, and the need to follow data protection laws. The article highlights how some blockchain-based companies have tackled these challenges, mainly through smart blockchain management and innovative technology, by looking at real-world examples from major companies like IBM, Bitpay, Ripple, and Coinbase. The systematic literature review (SLR) methodology involved reviewing literature from the past 15 years (2008-2023) from trusted sources like Google Scholar, ACM Digital Library, IEEE, Springer, and Science Direct. The findings indicate that cutting-edge technologies prioritizing privacy, such as zero-knowledge proofs, ring signatures, and encryption methods, would enable Bitcoin (BTC) platform operations to maintain or balance privacy and transparency. Furthermore, the study indicates the importance of clear privacy guidelines, adhering to relevant regulations, working closely with regulators and law enforcement, and educating users. In summary, it is crucial to approach blockchain carefully, prioritizing user privacy while meeting all legal and regulatory requirements.","PeriodicalId":135801,"journal":{"name":"Westcliff International Journal of Applied Research","volume":"16 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Westcliff International Journal of Applied Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47670/wuwijar202481wbcaam","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Blockchain technology offers a promising way to improve business processes by providing a secure and transparent transaction platform. However, using this technology brings its own set of challenges, especially when trying to balance user privacy with legal and regulatory needs. This article explores the challenges of keeping user information private, adhering to regulatory frameworks, and fulfilling legal requirements on the blockchain. A key point in this research is the challenge of keeping or maintaining confidentiality while being transparent. The article also discusses the issues of applying legal rules to a system not controlled by one central authority, the risks of privacy and security breaches, and the need to follow data protection laws. The article highlights how some blockchain-based companies have tackled these challenges, mainly through smart blockchain management and innovative technology, by looking at real-world examples from major companies like IBM, Bitpay, Ripple, and Coinbase. The systematic literature review (SLR) methodology involved reviewing literature from the past 15 years (2008-2023) from trusted sources like Google Scholar, ACM Digital Library, IEEE, Springer, and Science Direct. The findings indicate that cutting-edge technologies prioritizing privacy, such as zero-knowledge proofs, ring signatures, and encryption methods, would enable Bitcoin (BTC) platform operations to maintain or balance privacy and transparency. Furthermore, the study indicates the importance of clear privacy guidelines, adhering to relevant regulations, working closely with regulators and law enforcement, and educating users. In summary, it is crucial to approach blockchain carefully, prioritizing user privacy while meeting all legal and regulatory requirements.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在区块链上开展业务时平衡用户隐私和法律需求
区块链技术通过提供一个安全透明的交易平台,为改进业务流程提供了一种前景广阔的方式。然而,使用这种技术也会带来一系列挑战,尤其是在试图平衡用户隐私与法律法规需求时。本文探讨了在区块链上保护用户信息隐私、遵守监管框架和满足法律要求所面临的挑战。这项研究的一个关键点是在透明的同时保持或维护机密性所面临的挑战。文章还讨论了对不受中央机构控制的系统适用法律规则的问题、隐私和安全漏洞的风险以及遵守数据保护法的必要性。文章通过研究 IBM、Bitpay、Ripple 和 Coinbase 等大公司的实际案例,重点介绍了一些基于区块链的公司如何主要通过智能区块链管理和创新技术来应对这些挑战。系统文献综述(SLR)方法包括从谷歌学术、ACM 数字图书馆、IEEE、Springer 和 Science Direct 等可信来源查阅过去 15 年(2008-2023 年)的文献。研究结果表明,零知识证明、环形签名和加密方法等优先考虑隐私的尖端技术将使比特币(BTC)平台的运营能够保持或平衡隐私和透明度。此外,研究还指出了明确的隐私准则、遵守相关法规、与监管机构和执法部门密切合作以及教育用户的重要性。总之,必须谨慎对待区块链,在满足所有法律和监管要求的同时优先考虑用户隐私。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Labor Shortages in the Hospitality Industry: The Effects of Work-life Balance, Employee Compensation, Government-Issued Unemployment Benefits and Job Insecurity on Employees' Turnover Intentions Management Information Systems and Correlation Between E-Business and Information Security from a Business Intelligence Perspective Balancing User Privacy and Legal Demands while Conducting Businesses on the Blockchain Resilience and Responsiveness in Logistics Industry during Disruptive Events: A Case Study on the Impact of the Coronavirus Pandemic Influencing Corporate Creditworthiness: Case Study in the Egyptian Banking Sector
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1