Effects of plum powder and apple pomace powder addition on the physico-chemical, sensory, and textural properties of buffalo meat emulsion

Surender Kumar, Sanjay Yadav, R. Rani, A. Pathera
{"title":"Effects of plum powder and apple pomace powder addition on the physico-chemical, sensory, and textural properties of buffalo meat emulsion","authors":"Surender Kumar, Sanjay Yadav, R. Rani, A. Pathera","doi":"10.1108/nfs-09-2023-0223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to study the effects of plum powder and apple pomace powder additions on the quality properties of buffalo meat emulsion.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nBuffalo meat emulsions were prepared using different levels (2%, 4% and 6%) of plum powder and apple pomace powder, respectively. The meat emulsions were analysed for the physico-chemical, sensory and textural properties of the meat emulsion.\n\n\nFindings\nThe pH of meat emulsions decreased significantly (p < 0.05) with an increased level of plum powder and apple pomace powder. Water-holding capacity (43.1%–48.1%), emulsion stability (80.2%–92.2%) and cooking yield (85.4%–91.0%) were significantly (p < 0.05) higher in plum powder and apple pomace powder added than the water-holding capacity (42.1%), emulsion stability (79.7%) and cooking yield (85.0%) of control emulsion. The moisture content was decreased significantly (p < 0.05), and crude fibre content was increased significantly (p < 0.05) with the increase in plum powder and apple pomace powder additions in meat emulsions. The total phenolic content and colour values (a* and b*) were significantly higher in plum powder and apple pomace powder added to meat emulsions. The sensory scores of meat emulsions were affected by the addition of plum powder and apple pomace powder. The meat emulsion added with 6% plum powder and 6% apple pomace powder showed significantly lower values of sensory overall acceptability. The hardness of meat emulsions increased with the addition of plum powder and apple pomace powder.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe results indicated that meat emulsions with a good cooking yield, fibre content, sensory acceptability and textural properties can be prepared by using plum powder and apple pomace powder.\n","PeriodicalId":509279,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition &amp; Food Science","volume":"17 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition &amp; Food Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/nfs-09-2023-0223","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to study the effects of plum powder and apple pomace powder additions on the quality properties of buffalo meat emulsion. Design/methodology/approach Buffalo meat emulsions were prepared using different levels (2%, 4% and 6%) of plum powder and apple pomace powder, respectively. The meat emulsions were analysed for the physico-chemical, sensory and textural properties of the meat emulsion. Findings The pH of meat emulsions decreased significantly (p < 0.05) with an increased level of plum powder and apple pomace powder. Water-holding capacity (43.1%–48.1%), emulsion stability (80.2%–92.2%) and cooking yield (85.4%–91.0%) were significantly (p < 0.05) higher in plum powder and apple pomace powder added than the water-holding capacity (42.1%), emulsion stability (79.7%) and cooking yield (85.0%) of control emulsion. The moisture content was decreased significantly (p < 0.05), and crude fibre content was increased significantly (p < 0.05) with the increase in plum powder and apple pomace powder additions in meat emulsions. The total phenolic content and colour values (a* and b*) were significantly higher in plum powder and apple pomace powder added to meat emulsions. The sensory scores of meat emulsions were affected by the addition of plum powder and apple pomace powder. The meat emulsion added with 6% plum powder and 6% apple pomace powder showed significantly lower values of sensory overall acceptability. The hardness of meat emulsions increased with the addition of plum powder and apple pomace powder. Originality/value The results indicated that meat emulsions with a good cooking yield, fibre content, sensory acceptability and textural properties can be prepared by using plum powder and apple pomace powder.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
添加李子粉和苹果渣粉对水牛肉乳液的理化、感官和质构特性的影响
目的 本文旨在研究李子粉和苹果渣粉的添加量对水牛肉乳液质量特性的影响。结果随着李子粉和苹果渣粉用量的增加,肉乳液的 pH 值显著下降(p < 0.05)。李子粉和苹果渣粉的持水量(43.1%-48.1%)、乳化稳定性(80.2%-92.2%)和蒸煮率(85.4%-91.0%)明显高于对照组乳化液的持水量(42.1%)、乳化稳定性(79.7%)和蒸煮率(85.0%)(p < 0.05)。随着肉乳液中李子粉和苹果渣粉添加量的增加,水分含量明显降低(p < 0.05),粗纤维含量明显增加(p < 0.05)。在肉乳剂中添加李子粉和苹果渣粉,总酚含量和色值(a*和 b*)明显提高。肉乳剂的感官评分受李子粉和苹果渣粉添加量的影响。添加了 6% 李子粉和 6% 苹果渣粉的肉乳剂的感官总体可接受性值明显较低。结果表明,使用李子粉和苹果渣粉可以制备出烹饪率、纤维含量、感官可接受性和质构特性良好的肉乳剂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Probiotic soy beverages: a functional beverage on lipid profile, oxidative stress and kidney function: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials Probiotic soy beverages: a functional beverage on lipid profile, oxidative stress and kidney function: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials Pharmacological properties and stability of natural–colored foods: a literature review Ashwagandha: botanic occurrence, conventional uses, and significance in heart, metabolic, renal and hepatic disorder Evaluating women’s knowledge about dietary supplement use during pregnancy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1