Need-supportive leadership behaviors and sickness absence among employees: The mediating role of basic psychological need satisfaction

Andreas Stenling, Karina Nielsen, Anja Hagen Olafsen, Susanne Tafvelin
{"title":"Need-supportive leadership behaviors and sickness absence among employees: The mediating role of basic psychological need satisfaction","authors":"Andreas Stenling,&nbsp;Karina Nielsen,&nbsp;Anja Hagen Olafsen,&nbsp;Susanne Tafvelin","doi":"10.1111/apps.12523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Research exploring relationships between leadership behaviors and sickness absence is scarce. Grounded in self-determination theory (SDT), the present study examined: (i) the relationship between need-supportive leadership and sickness absence; and (ii) whether satisfaction of the basic psychological needs mediates the relationship between need-supportive leadership and sickness absence. Municipal employees (<i>n</i> = 347, 78% women, age span = 19–66 years) provided baseline data on perceived need-supportive leadership and reported their need satisfaction at work 8 weeks later. Sickness absence data were obtained from municipality records. Two-part regression models showed that need-supportive leadership was negatively associated with sick days (<i>b</i> = −0.28, 95% CI [−0.45, −0.11]). Need-supportive leadership had an indirect effect on the number of sick days through a composite score of need satisfaction (<i>ab</i> = −1.96, 95% CI [−5.11, −0.12]). Mediation models with each need separately indicated that autonomy (<i>ab</i> = −2.12, 95% CI [−5.33, −0.23]) and relatedness (<i>ab</i> = −1.33, 95% CI [−3.41, −0.11]) mediated the relationship between need-supportive leadership and number of sick days. Need-supportive leadership and need satisfaction at work may function as protective factors that provide followers with opportunities to deal with symptoms of ill health and reduce the risk of prolonged sickness absence.</p>","PeriodicalId":48289,"journal":{"name":"Applied Psychology-An International Review-Psychologie Appliquee-Revue Internationale","volume":"73 4","pages":"1688-1698"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/apps.12523","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Psychology-An International Review-Psychologie Appliquee-Revue Internationale","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/apps.12523","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research exploring relationships between leadership behaviors and sickness absence is scarce. Grounded in self-determination theory (SDT), the present study examined: (i) the relationship between need-supportive leadership and sickness absence; and (ii) whether satisfaction of the basic psychological needs mediates the relationship between need-supportive leadership and sickness absence. Municipal employees (n = 347, 78% women, age span = 19–66 years) provided baseline data on perceived need-supportive leadership and reported their need satisfaction at work 8 weeks later. Sickness absence data were obtained from municipality records. Two-part regression models showed that need-supportive leadership was negatively associated with sick days (b = −0.28, 95% CI [−0.45, −0.11]). Need-supportive leadership had an indirect effect on the number of sick days through a composite score of need satisfaction (ab = −1.96, 95% CI [−5.11, −0.12]). Mediation models with each need separately indicated that autonomy (ab = −2.12, 95% CI [−5.33, −0.23]) and relatedness (ab = −1.33, 95% CI [−3.41, −0.11]) mediated the relationship between need-supportive leadership and number of sick days. Need-supportive leadership and need satisfaction at work may function as protective factors that provide followers with opportunities to deal with symptoms of ill health and reduce the risk of prolonged sickness absence.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
需求支持型领导行为与员工病假:基本心理需求满足的中介作用
探讨领导行为与因病缺勤之间关系的研究很少。本研究以自我决定理论(SDT)为基础,探讨了:(i) 需求支持型领导与因病缺勤之间的关系;(ii) 基本心理需求的满足是否会调节需求支持型领导与因病缺勤之间的关系。市政雇员(n = 347,78% 为女性,年龄跨度 = 19-66 岁)提供了关于感知到的需求支持型领导的基线数据,并在 8 周后报告了他们在工作中的需求满意度。病假数据来自市政记录。两部分回归模型显示,需求支持型领导与病假天数呈负相关(b = -0.28,95% CI [-0.45, -0.11])。通过需求满意度的综合评分,需求支持型领导对病假天数有间接影响(ab = -1.96, 95% CI [-5.11, -0.12])。对每种需求分别建立的中介模型表明,自主性(ab = -2.12,95% CI [-5.33,-0.23])和相关性(ab =-1.33,95% CI [-3.41,-0.11])对需求支持型领导与病假天数之间的关系起中介作用。工作中的需求支持型领导和需求满足可能是一种保护性因素,为追随者提供了处理健康不佳症状的机会,降低了长期病假的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
5.60%
发文量
84
期刊介绍: "Applied Psychology: An International Review" is the esteemed official journal of the International Association of Applied Psychology (IAAP), a venerable organization established in 1920 that unites scholars and practitioners in the field of applied psychology. This peer-reviewed journal serves as a global platform for the scholarly exchange of research findings within the diverse domain of applied psychology. The journal embraces a wide array of topics within applied psychology, including organizational, cross-cultural, educational, health, counseling, environmental, traffic, and sport psychology. It particularly encourages submissions that enhance the understanding of psychological processes in various applied settings and studies that explore the impact of different national and cultural contexts on psychological phenomena.
期刊最新文献
The double-edged sword effect of leader humor on employee thriving at work Synergistic or Siloed? Communicative practices in dual-earner parents' boundary navigation and implications for gendered work-family experiences The causal relation between career calling and task performance: A three-wave panel study A literature review of model fit and model comparisons with confirmatory factor analysis: Formalizing the informal in organizational science Cognitive biases and research miscitations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1