County Readiness for eTourism Using Systematic Gap Analysis: The Case of Jordan

Ghazi Alkhatiba, Sinamis Bayouq
{"title":"County Readiness for eTourism Using Systematic Gap Analysis: The Case of Jordan","authors":"Ghazi Alkhatiba, Sinamis Bayouq","doi":"10.32038/mbrq.2024.29.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The primary focus of this study is to establish a mechanism for assessing a country readiness for eTourism using two paradigms: systematic review and gap analysis. This assessment will be conducted by applying eTourism technology aspects as the main detriments of eTourism and behavioral aspects as moderating factors to generate a three-level gap index. The systematic review for determining gap analysis will be based on a framework developed in the literature of the eTourism Technology Acceptance Model (ETAM). This study, based on ETAM, develops its own framework for the systematic review. A comparative study was performed on two dimensions. The first dimension involves the examination of technology-related factors, encompassing security, accessibility of mobile applications, support for mobile payments, user interface design, and quality. To improve understanding of how tourists assess the four technological aspects, the second dimension included two moderating factors: attitude and trust. Based on the systematic review, this paper demonstrates a methodology for calculating individualized gaps for the six factors, as well as compounded gap indexes for the two dimensions and the total composite gap index (CGI) for all six factors through the utilization of an Excel spreadsheet. Based on the overall assessment, as the authors deduced from the discussions, Jordan's readiness for eTourism still needs further improvements to its eTourism factors. Future investigations will involve the implementation of a framework, such as Expert Choice, to emulate the methods utilized in this research. In addition, the outcome of this endeavor should suggest potential avenues for continuous improvement and diversification of eTourism research.","PeriodicalId":510330,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Studies in Management and Business","volume":"143 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Studies in Management and Business","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32038/mbrq.2024.29.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The primary focus of this study is to establish a mechanism for assessing a country readiness for eTourism using two paradigms: systematic review and gap analysis. This assessment will be conducted by applying eTourism technology aspects as the main detriments of eTourism and behavioral aspects as moderating factors to generate a three-level gap index. The systematic review for determining gap analysis will be based on a framework developed in the literature of the eTourism Technology Acceptance Model (ETAM). This study, based on ETAM, develops its own framework for the systematic review. A comparative study was performed on two dimensions. The first dimension involves the examination of technology-related factors, encompassing security, accessibility of mobile applications, support for mobile payments, user interface design, and quality. To improve understanding of how tourists assess the four technological aspects, the second dimension included two moderating factors: attitude and trust. Based on the systematic review, this paper demonstrates a methodology for calculating individualized gaps for the six factors, as well as compounded gap indexes for the two dimensions and the total composite gap index (CGI) for all six factors through the utilization of an Excel spreadsheet. Based on the overall assessment, as the authors deduced from the discussions, Jordan's readiness for eTourism still needs further improvements to its eTourism factors. Future investigations will involve the implementation of a framework, such as Expert Choice, to emulate the methods utilized in this research. In addition, the outcome of this endeavor should suggest potential avenues for continuous improvement and diversification of eTourism research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用系统性差距分析为电子旅游做好县级准备:约旦案例
本研究的主要重点是利用系统审查和差距分析这两种范式,建立一个评估国家电子旅游就绪程度的机制。这项评估将把电子旅游技术方面作为电子旅游的主要不利因素,把行为方面作为调节因素,从而生成三级差距指数。为确定差距分析而进行的系统回顾将以文献中开发的电子旅游技术接受模型(ETAM)框架为基础。本研究以 ETAM 为基础,制定了自己的系统审查框架。比较研究从两个维度展开。第一个维度涉及技术相关因素的考察,包括安全性、移动应用的可访问性、对移动支付的支持、用户界面设计和质量。为了更好地了解游客如何评估这四个技术方面,第二个维度包括两个调节因素:态度和信任。在系统回顾的基础上,本文展示了一种计算方法,即利用 Excel 电子表格计算六个因素的个性化差距、两个维度的复合差距指数以及所有六个因素的综合差距指数(CGI)。根据总体评估结果,作者从讨论中推断,约旦的电子旅游准备情况仍需进一步改善。未来的调查将涉及实施一个框架,如专家选择,以模仿本研究中使用的方法。此外,这项工作的成果应为电子旅游研究的持续改进和多样化提供潜在的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Rise of Social Behavior in Social Media Marketing During Pandemic Analysis of the Regional Economic Structure in Mexico (2019-2021) County Readiness for eTourism Using Systematic Gap Analysis: The Case of Jordan Embedding Countries Governance in Assessing Companies' Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) Reporting: A Quantitative Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1