Hemodynamic study on the therapeutic effects of varying diameter embolic coils in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering Pub Date : 2024-01-28 DOI:10.1002/cnm.3807
Xiaoyu Ren, Haoran Li, Kaihang Xu, Zhongkai Li, Bin Gao, Wangsheng Lu, Guangming Yang, Yunjie Wang, Yin Yin, Tao Chen
{"title":"Hemodynamic study on the therapeutic effects of varying diameter embolic coils in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms","authors":"Xiaoyu Ren,&nbsp;Haoran Li,&nbsp;Kaihang Xu,&nbsp;Zhongkai Li,&nbsp;Bin Gao,&nbsp;Wangsheng Lu,&nbsp;Guangming Yang,&nbsp;Yunjie Wang,&nbsp;Yin Yin,&nbsp;Tao Chen","doi":"10.1002/cnm.3807","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Endovascular coiling is the predominant method for treating cerebral aneurysms. Extensive reports on selecting coil length, hardness, and material are available. However, the impact of coil diameter on postoperative outcomes remains unclear. This study enrolled six personalized geometric models of intracranial aneurysms: three bifurcation aneurysms and three sidewall aneurysms. Four coil models were constructed by changing the coil diameter. Coil embolization was simulated using the finite element method. Computational fluid dynamics was used to characterize hemodynamics in the aneurysms after embolization. Evaluation parameters included velocity reduction, wall shear stress (WSS), low WSS (LWSS), oscillatory shear index (OSI), relative residence time (RRT), and residual flow volume in the aneurysms. At the peak time (<i>t</i> = 0.17 s), the proportion of LWSS area in bifurcation aneurysms increase with the rise in coil diameter: 0.8D, 71.28 ± 12.62% versus 1D, 74.97 ± 19.17% versus 1.2D, 78.88 ± 18.56% versus 1.4D, 84.00 ± 11.53% (mean ± SD). The proportion of high OSI area decreases as the coil diameter increases: 0.8D, 4.41% ± 2.82% versus 1.0D, 3.78 ± 3.33% versus 1.2D, 2.28% ± 1.77% versus 1.4D, 1.58% ± 1.11% (mean ± SD). The proportion of high RRT area increases as the coil diameter rises: 0.8D, 3.40% ± 1.68% versus 1.0D, 7.67 ± 4.12% versus 1.2D, 9.84% ± 9.50% versus 1.4D, 22.29% ± 14.28% (mean ± SD). Side wall aneurysms do not exhibit the aforementioned trend. Bifurcation aneurysms plugged with a coil of 1.4 times the diameter have the largest RFVs (&lt;10 mm/s) within the group. Aforementioned patterns are not found in sidewall aneurysms. In the treatment of aneurysms with coiling, varying coil diameters can result in different hemodynamic environments within the aneurysm. Larger coil diameters have improved hemodynamic performance for bifurcation aneurysms. However, coil diameter and embolization effectiveness have no significant relationship for sidewall aneurysms.</p>","PeriodicalId":50349,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering","volume":"40 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cnm.3807","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Endovascular coiling is the predominant method for treating cerebral aneurysms. Extensive reports on selecting coil length, hardness, and material are available. However, the impact of coil diameter on postoperative outcomes remains unclear. This study enrolled six personalized geometric models of intracranial aneurysms: three bifurcation aneurysms and three sidewall aneurysms. Four coil models were constructed by changing the coil diameter. Coil embolization was simulated using the finite element method. Computational fluid dynamics was used to characterize hemodynamics in the aneurysms after embolization. Evaluation parameters included velocity reduction, wall shear stress (WSS), low WSS (LWSS), oscillatory shear index (OSI), relative residence time (RRT), and residual flow volume in the aneurysms. At the peak time (t = 0.17 s), the proportion of LWSS area in bifurcation aneurysms increase with the rise in coil diameter: 0.8D, 71.28 ± 12.62% versus 1D, 74.97 ± 19.17% versus 1.2D, 78.88 ± 18.56% versus 1.4D, 84.00 ± 11.53% (mean ± SD). The proportion of high OSI area decreases as the coil diameter increases: 0.8D, 4.41% ± 2.82% versus 1.0D, 3.78 ± 3.33% versus 1.2D, 2.28% ± 1.77% versus 1.4D, 1.58% ± 1.11% (mean ± SD). The proportion of high RRT area increases as the coil diameter rises: 0.8D, 3.40% ± 1.68% versus 1.0D, 7.67 ± 4.12% versus 1.2D, 9.84% ± 9.50% versus 1.4D, 22.29% ± 14.28% (mean ± SD). Side wall aneurysms do not exhibit the aforementioned trend. Bifurcation aneurysms plugged with a coil of 1.4 times the diameter have the largest RFVs (<10 mm/s) within the group. Aforementioned patterns are not found in sidewall aneurysms. In the treatment of aneurysms with coiling, varying coil diameters can result in different hemodynamic environments within the aneurysm. Larger coil diameters have improved hemodynamic performance for bifurcation aneurysms. However, coil diameter and embolization effectiveness have no significant relationship for sidewall aneurysms.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同直径栓塞线圈治疗颅内动脉瘤的血流动力学研究。
血管内线圈术是治疗脑动脉瘤的主要方法。目前已有大量关于选择线圈长度、硬度和材料的报告。然而,线圈直径对术后结果的影响仍不清楚。本研究选取了六个个性化的颅内动脉瘤几何模型:三个分叉动脉瘤和三个侧壁动脉瘤。通过改变线圈直径构建了四个线圈模型。使用有限元法对线圈栓塞进行了模拟。计算流体动力学用于描述栓塞后动脉瘤内的血液动力学特征。评估参数包括速度降低、壁剪应力(WSS)、低WSS(LWSS)、振荡剪切指数(OSI)、相对停留时间(RRT)和动脉瘤中的残余血流量。在峰值时间(t = 0.17 秒),分叉动脉瘤中 LWSS 面积的比例随着线圈直径的增加而增加:0.8D 为 71.28 ± 12.62%,1D 为 74.97 ± 19.17%,1.2D 为 78.88 ± 18.56%,1.4D 为 84.00 ± 11.53%(均值 ± 标度)。随着线圈直径的增加,高 OSI 面积的比例也在下降:0.8D 为 4.41% ± 2.82%,1.0D 为 3.78 ± 3.33%,1.2D 为 2.28% ± 1.77%,1.4D 为 1.58% ± 1.11%(平均值±标度)。高 RRT 区域的比例随着线圈直径的增加而增加:0.8D 为 3.40% ± 1.68%,1.0D 为 7.67 ± 4.12%,1.2D 为 9.84% ± 9.50%,1.4D 为 22.29% ± 14.28%(平均值±标度)。侧壁动脉瘤没有上述趋势。用直径 1.4 倍的线圈堵塞的分叉动脉瘤具有最大的 RFV (
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL-MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
9.50%
发文量
103
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: All differential equation based models for biomedical applications and their novel solutions (using either established numerical methods such as finite difference, finite element and finite volume methods or new numerical methods) are within the scope of this journal. Manuscripts with experimental and analytical themes are also welcome if a component of the paper deals with numerical methods. Special cases that may not involve differential equations such as image processing, meshing and artificial intelligence are within the scope. Any research that is broadly linked to the wellbeing of the human body, either directly or indirectly, is also within the scope of this journal.
期刊最新文献
Analyzing Spinal Cord Stimulation With Different Electrode Configurations: A Numerical Study. Effects of Congestion in Human Lung Investigated Using Dual-Scale Porous Medium Models. Impact of Convulsive Maternal Seizures on Fetus Dynamics. Modeling Fibrous Tissue in Vascular Fluid-Structure Interaction: A Morphology-Based Pipeline and Biomechanical Significance. A Multiscale Mathematical Model for Fetal Gas Transport and Regulatory Systems During Second Half of Pregnancy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1