Twenty-Five Years of Bayesian knowledge tracing: a systematic review

IF 3 3区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction Pub Date : 2024-01-27 DOI:10.1007/s11257-023-09389-4
Šarić-Grgić Ines, Grubišić Ani, Gašpar Angelina
{"title":"Twenty-Five Years of Bayesian knowledge tracing: a systematic review","authors":"Šarić-Grgić Ines, Grubišić Ani, Gašpar Angelina","doi":"10.1007/s11257-023-09389-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The quality of an artificial intelligence-based tutoring system is its ability to observe and interpret student behaviour to infer the preferences and needs of an individual student. The student model enables a comprehensive representation of student knowledge and affects the quality of the other intelligent tutoring system’s (ITS) components. The Bayesian knowledge tracing model (BKT) is one of the first machine learning-based and widely investigated student models due to its interpretability and ability to infer student knowledge. The past Twenty-five Years have seen increasingly rapid advances in the field, so this systematic review deals with the BKT model enhancements by using the PRISMA guidelines and a unique set of criteria, including 13 aspects of enhancements and computational methods. Also, the study reveals two types of evaluation approaches found in the literature, including the prediction of student answers and the ability to estimate knowledge mastery. Overall, the most frequently investigated enhancements extended the vanilla BKT model by including student characteristics and tutor interventions. The educational context-based enhancements of domain knowledge properties, question difficulty and architectural prior knowledge were also frequently investigated enhancements. The expectation–maximization algorithm practically became the standard in estimating BKT parameters. While the enhanced BKT models generally overperformed the vanilla model in predicting the student answer by using the measures such as RMSE (root mean square error), AUC–ROC (area under curve, receiver operating characteristics curve) and accuracy, only a few studies further investigated the systems’ estimations of knowledge mastery by correlating it to knowledge on post-tests. The most frequently used educational platforms included ITSs, Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) and simulated environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":49388,"journal":{"name":"User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11257-023-09389-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The quality of an artificial intelligence-based tutoring system is its ability to observe and interpret student behaviour to infer the preferences and needs of an individual student. The student model enables a comprehensive representation of student knowledge and affects the quality of the other intelligent tutoring system’s (ITS) components. The Bayesian knowledge tracing model (BKT) is one of the first machine learning-based and widely investigated student models due to its interpretability and ability to infer student knowledge. The past Twenty-five Years have seen increasingly rapid advances in the field, so this systematic review deals with the BKT model enhancements by using the PRISMA guidelines and a unique set of criteria, including 13 aspects of enhancements and computational methods. Also, the study reveals two types of evaluation approaches found in the literature, including the prediction of student answers and the ability to estimate knowledge mastery. Overall, the most frequently investigated enhancements extended the vanilla BKT model by including student characteristics and tutor interventions. The educational context-based enhancements of domain knowledge properties, question difficulty and architectural prior knowledge were also frequently investigated enhancements. The expectation–maximization algorithm practically became the standard in estimating BKT parameters. While the enhanced BKT models generally overperformed the vanilla model in predicting the student answer by using the measures such as RMSE (root mean square error), AUC–ROC (area under curve, receiver operating characteristics curve) and accuracy, only a few studies further investigated the systems’ estimations of knowledge mastery by correlating it to knowledge on post-tests. The most frequently used educational platforms included ITSs, Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) and simulated environments.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
贝叶斯知识追踪二十五年:系统回顾
基于人工智能的辅导系统的质量在于其观察和解释学生行为的能力,从而推断出每个学生的偏好和需求。学生模型能够全面呈现学生知识,并影响其他智能辅导系统(ITS)组件的质量。贝叶斯知识追踪模型(BKT)是最早基于机器学习的学生模型之一,因其可解释性和推断学生知识的能力而受到广泛研究。在过去的二十五年中,该领域的发展日新月异,因此本系统性综述通过使用 PRISMA 准则和一套独特的标准(包括 13 个方面的改进和计算方法)来讨论 BKT 模型的改进。此外,研究还揭示了文献中发现的两类评价方法,包括预测学生答案和估计知识掌握程度的能力。总体而言,最常研究的增强方法是通过加入学生特征和导师干预来扩展虚构 BKT 模型。基于教育背景的领域知识属性、问题难度和架构先验知识的增强也是经常被研究的增强方法。期望最大化算法实际上已成为估计 BKT 参数的标准。虽然通过使用 RMSE(均方根误差)、AUC-ROC(曲线下面积,接收者操作特性曲线)和准确性等指标,增强型 BKT 模型在预测学生答案方面的表现通常优于 vanilla 模型,但只有少数研究通过将其与后测知识相关联,进一步调查了系统对知识掌握情况的估计。最常用的教育平台包括智能学习系统、大规模开放在线课程(MOOC)和模拟环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction
User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 工程技术-计算机:控制论
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
35
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction provides an interdisciplinary forum for the dissemination of novel and significant original research results about interactive computer systems that can adapt themselves to their users, and on the design, use, and evaluation of user models for adaptation. The journal publishes high-quality original papers from, e.g., the following areas: acquisition and formal representation of user models; conceptual models and user stereotypes for personalization; student modeling and adaptive learning; models of groups of users; user model driven personalised information discovery and retrieval; recommender systems; adaptive user interfaces and agents; adaptation for accessibility and inclusion; generic user modeling systems and tools; interoperability of user models; personalization in areas such as; affective computing; ubiquitous and mobile computing; language based interactions; multi-modal interactions; virtual and augmented reality; social media and the Web; human-robot interaction; behaviour change interventions; personalized applications in specific domains; privacy, accountability, and security of information for personalization; responsible adaptation: fairness, accountability, explainability, transparency and control; methods for the design and evaluation of user models and adaptive systems
期刊最新文献
Hybrid music recommendation with graph neural networks AdaptUI: A Framework for the development of Adaptive User Interfaces in Smart Product-Service Systems Examining the merits of feature-specific similarity functions in the news domain using human judgments SNRBERT: session-based news recommender using BERT A deep neural network approach for fake news detection using linguistic and psychological features
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1