University ‘Pay-for-grades’: the bait and switch search engine optimization strategies of contract cheating websites in the United States

IF 3.8 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH International Journal for Educational Integrity Pub Date : 2024-01-25 DOI:10.1007/s40979-023-00148-x
Timothy M. Daly, James C. Ryan
{"title":"University ‘Pay-for-grades’: the bait and switch search engine optimization strategies of contract cheating websites in the United States","authors":"Timothy M. Daly, James C. Ryan","doi":"10.1007/s40979-023-00148-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper presents the first systematic investigation into the search engine optimization practices of major contract cheating websites in the United States. From a business perspective, visibility in organic search engine results is considered one of the top client recruitment tools. The current understanding of student recruitment strategies by these companies remains largely unexplored in both academic literature and popular press. Replicating the business research practices used in the search engine optimization industry, comprehensive search engine ranking and traffic data was obtained for the 38 largest contract cheating websites in the US. The overall objective was to illuminate the strategies that these companies take to get their services at the top of the search results of as many students as possible – not just the relatively small proportion of students actively cheating. The results show that these companies dominate the search results for not just students searching to cheat, but also for naïve search efforts, when students are simply doing genuine research or classwork. These nefarious companies use highly sophisticated search engine manipulation strategies to bait naïve student searchers onto their sites, thus enabling the potential to switch them to cheaters. Higher education institutions, armed with the specific details provided in this study, can use the strategies outlined in the discussion to directly and negatively impact on the success of these contract cheating services.</p>","PeriodicalId":44838,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","volume":"93 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-023-00148-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper presents the first systematic investigation into the search engine optimization practices of major contract cheating websites in the United States. From a business perspective, visibility in organic search engine results is considered one of the top client recruitment tools. The current understanding of student recruitment strategies by these companies remains largely unexplored in both academic literature and popular press. Replicating the business research practices used in the search engine optimization industry, comprehensive search engine ranking and traffic data was obtained for the 38 largest contract cheating websites in the US. The overall objective was to illuminate the strategies that these companies take to get their services at the top of the search results of as many students as possible – not just the relatively small proportion of students actively cheating. The results show that these companies dominate the search results for not just students searching to cheat, but also for naïve search efforts, when students are simply doing genuine research or classwork. These nefarious companies use highly sophisticated search engine manipulation strategies to bait naïve student searchers onto their sites, thus enabling the potential to switch them to cheaters. Higher education institutions, armed with the specific details provided in this study, can use the strategies outlined in the discussion to directly and negatively impact on the success of these contract cheating services.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大学 "付费评级":美国合同作弊网站的诱饵和转换搜索引擎优化策略
本文首次对美国主要合同作弊网站的搜索引擎优化实践进行了系统调查。从商业角度看,在有机搜索引擎结果中的能见度被认为是最重要的客户招募工具之一。目前,学术文献和大众媒体对这些公司的学生招聘策略的了解基本上还是空白。仿照搜索引擎优化行业的商业研究方法,我们获得了美国 38 家最大的合同作弊网站的综合搜索引擎排名和流量数据。总体目标是阐明这些公司采取了哪些策略,使其服务在尽可能多的学生--而不仅仅是相对较少的主动作弊学生--的搜索结果中名列前茅。研究结果表明,这些公司不仅在搜索作弊的学生的搜索结果中占据主导地位,而且还在天真的搜索结果中占据主导地位,因为学生只是在做真正的研究或课堂作业。这些邪恶的公司利用高度复杂的搜索引擎操纵策略,诱使天真的学生搜索者进入他们的网站,从而有可能将他们转为作弊者。高等教育机构可以根据本研究提供的具体细节,利用讨论中概述的策略直接对这些合同作弊服务的成功产生负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal for Educational Integrity
International Journal for Educational Integrity EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
26.10%
发文量
25
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊最新文献
Clues to fostering a program culture of academic integrity: findings from a multidimensional regression model Expressions of gratitude in education: an analysis of the #ThankYourTeacher campaign Critical thinking, assessment, and educational policy in Palestinian universities Can you spot the bot? Identifying AI-generated writing in college essays Knowledge, attitudes, and perceived Ethics regarding the use of ChatGPT among generation Z university students
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1