Türkiye’nin İç Anadolu Bölgesindeki Dört Üniversitede Akademisyenlerin Bilim Felsefesi ve Bilim Tarihi Alanlarına Duydukları İlgi Düzeyleri

Habib Sarikaya, Omur Sayli̇gi̇l
{"title":"Türkiye’nin İç Anadolu Bölgesindeki Dört Üniversitede Akademisyenlerin Bilim Felsefesi ve Bilim Tarihi Alanlarına Duydukları İlgi Düzeyleri","authors":"Habib Sarikaya, Omur Sayli̇gi̇l","doi":"10.31020/mutftd.1382000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: Determination of the level of interest in the fields of history of science and philosophy of science among academicians will contribute to the identification of the steps to be taken towards a solution to identify the problems that prevent producing knowledge and contributing to science and creating a more suitable scientific environment. The aim of this research is to reveal the level of interest in the fields of philosophy of science and history of science among academicians. \nMethods: In this research, conducted with the voluntary participation of 682 academicians from four different universities in the Central Anatolia Region, data were collected through face-to-face interviews between December 2019 and March 2020. The faculties where the data will be collected were determined according to OECD's categorical science fields, and then the number of academics to be interviewed was determined according to the frequencies of academic titles. The participants were asked to answer the two questions (i.e., “Are you interested in the philosophy of science?” and “Are you interested in the history of science?”) on a 5-point Likert-type data collection tool which was developed by the researcher. \nFindings: The average age of the academics participating in the research was 38.4±9.7 years and 44.6% of the participants were female. Of the academics participating in the study, 13.5% were professors (n=92), 14.4% were associate professors (n=98), 29.5% were lecturers (n=201) and 42.6% were research assistants (n=291). It was found that 52.3% of the academics were interested in the field of philosophy of science, while 10.1% were very interested in it. While the rate of academics who were interested in the history of science was 63.5%, the rate of those who were very interested in it was 10.7%. The level of interest in the history of science increased with age (p=0.019). Male academics (13.5% very interested) were more interested in the history of science than female academics (7.2% very interested) (p=0.034). It was determined that academics who are more experienced were more interested in the history of science and philosophy of science than less experienced academics (p","PeriodicalId":508552,"journal":{"name":"Mersin Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Lokman Hekim Tıp Tarihi ve Folklorik Tıp Dergisi","volume":"38 16","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mersin Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Lokman Hekim Tıp Tarihi ve Folklorik Tıp Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31020/mutftd.1382000","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Determination of the level of interest in the fields of history of science and philosophy of science among academicians will contribute to the identification of the steps to be taken towards a solution to identify the problems that prevent producing knowledge and contributing to science and creating a more suitable scientific environment. The aim of this research is to reveal the level of interest in the fields of philosophy of science and history of science among academicians. Methods: In this research, conducted with the voluntary participation of 682 academicians from four different universities in the Central Anatolia Region, data were collected through face-to-face interviews between December 2019 and March 2020. The faculties where the data will be collected were determined according to OECD's categorical science fields, and then the number of academics to be interviewed was determined according to the frequencies of academic titles. The participants were asked to answer the two questions (i.e., “Are you interested in the philosophy of science?” and “Are you interested in the history of science?”) on a 5-point Likert-type data collection tool which was developed by the researcher. Findings: The average age of the academics participating in the research was 38.4±9.7 years and 44.6% of the participants were female. Of the academics participating in the study, 13.5% were professors (n=92), 14.4% were associate professors (n=98), 29.5% were lecturers (n=201) and 42.6% were research assistants (n=291). It was found that 52.3% of the academics were interested in the field of philosophy of science, while 10.1% were very interested in it. While the rate of academics who were interested in the history of science was 63.5%, the rate of those who were very interested in it was 10.7%. The level of interest in the history of science increased with age (p=0.019). Male academics (13.5% very interested) were more interested in the history of science than female academics (7.2% very interested) (p=0.034). It was determined that academics who are more experienced were more interested in the history of science and philosophy of science than less experienced academics (p
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
土耳其安纳托利亚中部地区四所大学的学者对科学哲学和科学史的兴趣程度
目的:确定院士们对科学史和科学哲学领域的兴趣程度将有助于确定应采取的解决 步骤,以查明阻碍产生知识和促进科学发展的问题,并创造一个更合适的科学环 境。本研究旨在揭示院士们对科学哲学和科学史领域的兴趣程度。研究方法:本研究由安纳托利亚中部地区四所不同大学的 682 名院士自愿参与,在 2019 年 12 月至 2020 年 3 月期间通过面对面访谈收集数据。收集数据的院系是根据经合组织的分类科学领域确定的,然后根据学术头衔的频率确定受访学者的人数。研究人员使用自己开发的 5 点李克特式数据收集工具,要求参与者回答两个问题(即 "您是否对科学哲学感兴趣?研究结果参与研究的学者的平均年龄为(38.4±9.7)岁,44.6%的参与者为女性。在参与研究的学者中,教授占 13.5%(92 人),副教授占 14.4%(98 人),讲师占 29.5%(201 人),研究助理占 42.6%(291 人)。调查发现,52.3% 的学者对科学哲学领域感兴趣,10.1% 的学者非常感兴趣。对科学史感兴趣的学者占 63.5%,非常感兴趣的学者占 10.7%。对科学史感兴趣的程度随着年龄的增长而增加(p=0.019)。男性学者(13.5% 非常感兴趣)比女性学者(7.2% 非常感兴趣)对科学史更感兴趣(p=0.034)。经验丰富的学者比经验不足的学者对科学史和科学哲学更感兴趣(p=0.019)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Prenatal Tarama Testleri ve Etik Kaygılar Üzerine Bir Derleme Orta Çağ’da İslam dünyasında yazılmış eserlerde “Çiçek ve Kızamık” üzerine-Gerileme Dönemi-II: Kitābu’t-Teysīr fī’l-Mudāvāt ve’t-Tedbīr Orta Çağ’da İslam dünyasında yazılmış eserlerde “Çiçek ve Kızamık” üzerine-Altın Çağ-II: Zehrāvī Kitābu’t-Taṣrīf’inde Rāzī’nin Kitābu’l-Cederī ve’l-Ḥaṣbe’sinden etkilendi mi? Karşılaştırmalı bir çalışma Tıp Etiği Araştırmalarında Q Metodolojisi Kullanımı: Radyoloji Alanında Yapay Zekâ Etiği Araştırması Örneği Batı Karadeniz Toplumunda 18 Yaş Altı Bireylerde Maloklüzyon Prevalansı
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1