Effectiveness and Patient Satisfaction of Telepsychiatry Services for Reducing Anxiety in COVID-19 Outpatients: A Assessor Blinded RCT

Mohammad Hosein Hayavi-Haghighi, Somayeh Davoodi, Marjan Mosallanejad
{"title":"Effectiveness and Patient Satisfaction of Telepsychiatry Services\nfor Reducing Anxiety in COVID-19 Outpatients: A Assessor\nBlinded RCT","authors":"Mohammad Hosein Hayavi-Haghighi, Somayeh Davoodi, Marjan Mosallanejad","doi":"10.2174/0126660822275034231214075211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nGiven the importance of anxiety management in pandemics, this\nstudy evaluated the effectiveness of telepsychiatry in reducing anxiety in outpatients with\nCOVID-19 and their satisfaction.\n\n\n\nThis RCT was conducted in a health center in which 188 COVID-19 outpatients\nparticipated. First, anxiety level was measured in both the intervention (IG) and control\n(CG) groups using the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI). Then, the IG was offered four educational contents via WhatsApp for four consecutive weeks. One month later, participants\ncompleted the BAI questionnaire again, and the CG completed a satisfaction questionnaire.\nDescriptive statistics and Wilcoxon and Chi-square tests were applied.\n\n\n\nPsychosomatic complications were significantly reduced only in IG, but physical\ncomplications were reduced in both groups. Total anxiety also decreased significantly in\nboth groups, but more significantly in IG (p < .001 for IG and p < .039 for CG). The efficacy of telepsychiatry in reducing anxiety in healthcare workers was greater than in other\noccupational groups. There was no significant relationship between other demographic\nvariables and telepsychiatry effectiveness. Seventy-eight percent of IG participants had a\nhigh level of satisfaction and 70.3% expressed a high desire to receive telepsychiatry in the\nfuture. The most important advantages of telepsychiatry were observing social distance,\nsaving time, and reducing costs. In addition, The most important challenges were the lack\nof face-to-face contact, the lack of previous experience, and the late response of the psychologist.\n\n\n\nTelepsychiatry effectively reduced moderate anxiety related to COVID-19\nand provided high satisfaction.\n","PeriodicalId":36711,"journal":{"name":"Current Psychiatry Research and Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Psychiatry Research and Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0126660822275034231214075211","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Given the importance of anxiety management in pandemics, this study evaluated the effectiveness of telepsychiatry in reducing anxiety in outpatients with COVID-19 and their satisfaction. This RCT was conducted in a health center in which 188 COVID-19 outpatients participated. First, anxiety level was measured in both the intervention (IG) and control (CG) groups using the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI). Then, the IG was offered four educational contents via WhatsApp for four consecutive weeks. One month later, participants completed the BAI questionnaire again, and the CG completed a satisfaction questionnaire. Descriptive statistics and Wilcoxon and Chi-square tests were applied. Psychosomatic complications were significantly reduced only in IG, but physical complications were reduced in both groups. Total anxiety also decreased significantly in both groups, but more significantly in IG (p < .001 for IG and p < .039 for CG). The efficacy of telepsychiatry in reducing anxiety in healthcare workers was greater than in other occupational groups. There was no significant relationship between other demographic variables and telepsychiatry effectiveness. Seventy-eight percent of IG participants had a high level of satisfaction and 70.3% expressed a high desire to receive telepsychiatry in the future. The most important advantages of telepsychiatry were observing social distance, saving time, and reducing costs. In addition, The most important challenges were the lack of face-to-face contact, the lack of previous experience, and the late response of the psychologist. Telepsychiatry effectively reduced moderate anxiety related to COVID-19 and provided high satisfaction.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
远程精神病学服务减轻 COVID-19 门诊患者焦虑的效果和患者满意度:一项评估者盲法 RCT
鉴于焦虑管理在大流行病中的重要性,本研究评估了远程心理治疗在减轻 COVID-19 门诊患者焦虑方面的效果及其满意度。首先,使用贝克焦虑量表(BAI)测量了干预组(IG)和对照组(CG)的焦虑水平。然后,干预组连续四周通过 WhatsApp 提供四种教育内容。描述性统计、Wilcoxon 检验和 Chi-square 检验结果表明,只有 IG 组的心身并发症显著减少,但两组的躯体并发症均有减少。两组的总焦虑也明显减少,但 IG 组更为明显(IG 组 P < 0.001,CG 组 P < 0.039)。与其他职业组相比,远程心理治疗在减轻医护人员焦虑方面的效果更好。其他人口统计学变量与远程心理治疗效果之间没有明显关系。78% 的 IG 参与者表示非常满意,70.3% 表示非常希望今后能接受远程精神病学治疗。远程精神病学最重要的优势是拉近社会距离、节省时间和降低成本。此外,最重要的挑战是缺乏面对面的接触、缺乏以往的经验以及心理学家的反应较晚。远程精神病学有效地减轻了与 COVID-19 相关的中度焦虑,并提供了较高的满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current Psychiatry Research and Reviews
Current Psychiatry Research and Reviews Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
期刊最新文献
The Efficacy of Bibliotherapy in Depression Management: A Systematic Review of Randomized Clinical Trials Psychosis and Neurosis: Main Differences and Impact on Life The Social Media Mirror: Understanding the Distortion of Eating Habits and Body Image in the Digital Age The Experience of Parents When they Find Out that their Child has Autism: A Phenomenological Study Revolutionizing Psychiatric Care: Unleashing the Potential of Augmented and Virtual Reality for Diagnosis and Education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1