Toward a Strategic Perspective of Meeting Participation

IF 3.9 1区心理学 Q2 MANAGEMENT Organizational Psychology Review Pub Date : 2024-01-22 DOI:10.1177/20413866231226405

S. Beck, Emily A. Paskewitz, Joseph A. Allen

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Participation in meetings is a multifaceted process. Meeting members must consider individual and meeting goals when creating their messages, as well as a host of other context and resource factors. The purpose of this essay is to create a framework through which to consider meeting member contributions. Pulling from literature in impression management, resource conservation, and meeting science, the essay introduces a strategic perspective of meeting participation and categorizes five meeting participation types. Implications of this perspective on future meeting research are considered.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

会议参与的战略视角

参与会议是一个多方面的过程。会议成员在撰写信息时必须考虑个人目标和会议目标，以及一系列其他背景和资源因素。本文旨在建立一个框架，以考虑会议成员的贡献。文章从印象管理、资源保护和会议科学等方面的文献出发，介绍了会议参与的战略视角，并对五种会议参与类型进行了分类。文章还考虑了这一观点对未来会议研究的影响。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Organizational Psychology Review Multiple-

CiteScore

10.00

自引率

1.60%

发文量

期刊介绍： Organizational Psychology Review is a quarterly, peer-reviewed scholarly journal published by SAGE in partnership with the European Association of Work and Organizational Psychology. Organizational Psychology Review’s unique aim is to publish original conceptual work and meta-analyses in the field of organizational psychology (broadly defined to include applied psychology, industrial psychology, occupational psychology, organizational behavior, personnel psychology, and work psychology).Articles accepted for publication in Organizational Psychology Review will have the potential to have a major impact on research and practice in organizational psychology. They will offer analyses worth citing, worth following up on in primary research, and worth considering as a basis for applied managerial practice. As such, these should be contributions that move beyond straight forward reviews of the existing literature by developing new theory and insights. At the same time, however, they should be well-grounded in the state of the art and the empirical knowledge base, providing a good mix of a firm empirical and theoretical basis and exciting new ideas.