Building an inclusive botany: The “radicle” dream

Makenzie E. Mabry, Nuala F Caomhánach, R. Abrahams, M. L. Gaynor, Kasey K Pham, Tanisha M. Williams, Kathleen S. Murphy, V. Smocovitis, D. Soltis, P. Soltis
{"title":"Building an inclusive botany: The “radicle” dream","authors":"Makenzie E. Mabry, Nuala F Caomhánach, R. Abrahams, M. L. Gaynor, Kasey K Pham, Tanisha M. Williams, Kathleen S. Murphy, V. Smocovitis, D. Soltis, P. Soltis","doi":"10.1002/ppp3.10478","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is important to recognize how our current understanding of plants has been shaped by diverse cultural contexts, as this underscores the importance of valuing and incorporating contributions from all knowledge systems in scientific pursuits. This approach emphasizes the ongoing bias, including within scientific practices, and the necessity of discussing problematic histories within spaces of learning. It is crucial to acknowledge and address biases, even within scientific endeavors. Doing so fosters a more inclusive and equitable scientific community. This article, while not comprehensive, serves as a starting point for conversation and an introduction to current work on these topics.In response to a global dialog about systemic racism, ongoing inequalities, appeals to decolonize science, and the many recent calls for diversity, equity, accessibility, and inclusion, we draw on the narratives of plants to revisit the history of botany. Our goal is to uncover how exclusionary practices have functioned in the past and persist today. We also explore the numerous opportunities and challenges that arise in the era of information as we strive to establish a more inclusive field of botany. This approach recognizes and honors the contributions of historically marginalized groups, such as Black and Indigenous communities. We hope that this article can serve as a catalyst for raising awareness, fostering contemplation, and driving action toward a more equitable and just scientific community.","PeriodicalId":508327,"journal":{"name":"PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET","volume":"15 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp3.10478","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is important to recognize how our current understanding of plants has been shaped by diverse cultural contexts, as this underscores the importance of valuing and incorporating contributions from all knowledge systems in scientific pursuits. This approach emphasizes the ongoing bias, including within scientific practices, and the necessity of discussing problematic histories within spaces of learning. It is crucial to acknowledge and address biases, even within scientific endeavors. Doing so fosters a more inclusive and equitable scientific community. This article, while not comprehensive, serves as a starting point for conversation and an introduction to current work on these topics.In response to a global dialog about systemic racism, ongoing inequalities, appeals to decolonize science, and the many recent calls for diversity, equity, accessibility, and inclusion, we draw on the narratives of plants to revisit the history of botany. Our goal is to uncover how exclusionary practices have functioned in the past and persist today. We also explore the numerous opportunities and challenges that arise in the era of information as we strive to establish a more inclusive field of botany. This approach recognizes and honors the contributions of historically marginalized groups, such as Black and Indigenous communities. We hope that this article can serve as a catalyst for raising awareness, fostering contemplation, and driving action toward a more equitable and just scientific community.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
建立包容性植物学:"放射线 "梦想
认识到我们目前对植物的理解是如何在不同的文化背景下形成的非常重要,因为这强调了重视所有知识体系的贡献并将其纳入科学追求的重要性。这种方法强调了持续存在的偏见,包括科学实践中的偏见,以及在学习空间中讨论有问题的历史的必要性。承认和解决偏见至关重要,即使是在科学工作中。这样做可以促进科学界更加包容和公平。为了回应有关系统性种族主义、持续存在的不平等现象、科学非殖民化的呼吁以及最近有关多样性、公平性、可及性和包容性的众多呼吁的全球对话,我们借鉴植物的叙述,重新审视植物学的历史。我们的目标是揭示排斥性做法是如何在过去发挥作用并持续至今的。在我们努力建立一个更具包容性的植物学领域的过程中,我们还探讨了信息时代所带来的众多机遇和挑战。这种方法承认并尊重历史上被边缘化的群体,如黑人和土著社区的贡献。我们希望这篇文章能够成为一种催化剂,提高人们的认识,促进思考,并推动人们采取行动,建立一个更加公平和公正的科学界。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Towards resource‐efficient forests: Mixing species changes crown biomass allocation and improves growth efficiency Cell wall polysaccharides determine cooking quality in cassava roots Whole genome resequencing reveals the evolutionary history and geographic isolation of the eastern Asian Hickory (Carya) Plant memories: Art co‐created with the public as a tool for investigating how people build lasting connections with plants Solar arrays create novel environments that uniquely alter plant responses
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1