The Association of Personality Characteristics with Learning Strategy Preferences

Gary J. Conti, Rita C. McNeil
{"title":"The Association of Personality Characteristics with Learning Strategy Preferences","authors":"Gary J. Conti, Rita C. McNeil","doi":"10.5539/jel.v13n2p1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to describe the association between the learning strategy preference of the learners as identified by Assessing The Learning Strategies of AdultS (ATLAS) and the individual personality traits as defined by the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI). The sample was 553 adults in Canada and the United States. Two types of analyses were used to investigate the association between learning strategy preferences and personality traits. First, discriminant analysis explored the interaction of personality traits with the learning strategy preference. Second, analysis of variance measured the association of each personality trait with the learning-strategy-preference groups separately. The findings provided several explicit personality traits associated with each learning-strategy-preference group. These findings support the conclusion that a strong association exists between personality traits and learning-strategy-preference characteristics. Learning strategy preferences and personality traits complement each other. Each clarifies and enriches the other. As a result, teachers have two indicators that can help them personalize the teaching-learning environment for each student. Teachers can use the learning-strategy-group descriptions as guides for organizing each learner's instructional activities and plans and as a cognitive framework for uncovering and monitoring student behaviors and alerting teachers to potential learning difficulties for some students. Students can apply the descriptions of the learning-strategy-preference groups to facilitate self-assessment and metacognition. Theory can be enhanced by considering the two concepts of learning strategy preferences and personality traits coupled and by conducting quantitative and qualitative research to test and expand the generalizability of the learning-strategy-group descriptions. (Permission is granted to use Assessing The Learning Strategies of AdultS and the Personality Identity Estimator in practice and research. Links to printable copies and online completion are appended.)","PeriodicalId":502937,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Education and Learning","volume":"23 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Education and Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v13n2p1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to describe the association between the learning strategy preference of the learners as identified by Assessing The Learning Strategies of AdultS (ATLAS) and the individual personality traits as defined by the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI). The sample was 553 adults in Canada and the United States. Two types of analyses were used to investigate the association between learning strategy preferences and personality traits. First, discriminant analysis explored the interaction of personality traits with the learning strategy preference. Second, analysis of variance measured the association of each personality trait with the learning-strategy-preference groups separately. The findings provided several explicit personality traits associated with each learning-strategy-preference group. These findings support the conclusion that a strong association exists between personality traits and learning-strategy-preference characteristics. Learning strategy preferences and personality traits complement each other. Each clarifies and enriches the other. As a result, teachers have two indicators that can help them personalize the teaching-learning environment for each student. Teachers can use the learning-strategy-group descriptions as guides for organizing each learner's instructional activities and plans and as a cognitive framework for uncovering and monitoring student behaviors and alerting teachers to potential learning difficulties for some students. Students can apply the descriptions of the learning-strategy-preference groups to facilitate self-assessment and metacognition. Theory can be enhanced by considering the two concepts of learning strategy preferences and personality traits coupled and by conducting quantitative and qualitative research to test and expand the generalizability of the learning-strategy-group descriptions. (Permission is granted to use Assessing The Learning Strategies of AdultS and the Personality Identity Estimator in practice and research. Links to printable copies and online completion are appended.)
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人格特征与学习策略偏好的关联
本研究的目的是描述 "成人学习策略评估"(ATLAS)所确定的学习者的学习策略偏好与迈尔斯-布里格斯类型指标(MBTI)所定义的个人性格特征之间的关联。样本为加拿大和美国的 553 名成年人。我们使用了两种分析方法来研究学习策略偏好与人格特质之间的关联。首先,判别分析探讨了人格特质与学习策略偏好之间的相互作用。其次,方差分析分别测量了每个人格特质与学习策略偏好组之间的关联。研究结果提供了与每个学习策略偏好组相关的几种明确的人格特质。这些结果支持了人格特质与学习策略偏好特征之间存在紧密联系的结论。学习策略偏好和人格特质是相辅相成的。二者相互澄清和丰富。因此,教师有两个指标可以帮助他们为每个学生提供个性化的教学环境。教师可以将学习策略群描述作为组织每个学生的教学活动和计划的指南,也可以将其作为发现和监控学生行为的认知框架,并提醒教师注意某些学生潜在的学习困难。学生可以应用学习策略偏好组的描述来促进自我评估和元认知。将学习策略偏好和个性特征这两个概念结合起来考虑,并通过开展定量和定性研究来检验和扩大学习策略群体描述的可推广性,可以增强理论的说服力。(允许在实践和研究中使用 "评估成人的学习策略 "和 "人格特征估计器"。可打印副本和在线填写的链接附后)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reversed Subtitling and Extensive Reading: The Case of English-Subtitled Mandarin Dramas Students Learning Achievement and Satisfaction of Chinese Proficiency Test (HSK1) Reading Courses on the Udemy Platform Does OER Research-Based Learning Improve Performance: A Case Study from Students Enrolled in a Community College at City University of New York (CUNY) Educational Public Policies for The Rural Area: An Analysis of the Closure of Basic Education Schools in Brazil Immorality on Campus: Declining Values Among Students in Higher Education Institutions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1