Emergency Treatment of Ruptured Abdominal Aneurysm

E. Nuellari, Maxim Llambro
{"title":"Emergency Treatment of Ruptured Abdominal Aneurysm","authors":"E. Nuellari, Maxim Llambro","doi":"10.32391/ajtes.v8i1.358","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Abdominal aneurysm is considered a formidable pathological condition that requires prompt treatment. Its progressive increase leads to rupture and massive internal bleeding, which requires the most effective medical care. However, despite the improvement in medical equipment and postoperative care, mortality due to ruptured abdominal aneurysms is still close to 50%, which is primarily related to the severity of the pathology and open surgical intervention. \nMaterials and Methods: 46 patients diagnosed with rupture of the abdominal aorta took part in the study. Selection criteria were a history of abdominal aortic rupture, conservative/operative treatment for the disease, and absence of other complications (acute renal failure, liver infarction) that could affect the results of the study. \nResults: Since January 2018, 46 cases of ruptured AAAs have been diagnosed. In all forty-six cases, surgical intervention was used: open surgery or endovascular technique. All 100% of patients had a previous history of diagnosed abdominal aortic aneurysm, for which they underwent periodic ultrasound examinations. \nAs a result of the study, it was found that endovascular aortic aneurysm correction is the optimal method for both planned and emergency treatment of aortic aneurysm and its rupture. According to the Cochrane Specialized Register, it was established that endovascular repair is associated with a reduction in early morbidity and mortality after abdominal aneurysm, compared with other methods of surgical treatment. Furthermore, the study found that, unlike open surgery methods, endovascular techniques are associated with a lower risk of complications in the form of intestinal ischemia. \nConclusions: Inferior quality studies and lack of information limit the conclusions of this review. From the statistical data shown in this paper, it can be concluded that there is a difference between endovascular and open methods of treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture. Mortality within the first 30 days after treatment and short-term complications are significantly lower in patients using EVAR. Systemic complications are also more prevalent in patients who were prescribed open surgical treatment.","PeriodicalId":32905,"journal":{"name":"Albanian Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery","volume":"27 19","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Albanian Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32391/ajtes.v8i1.358","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Abdominal aneurysm is considered a formidable pathological condition that requires prompt treatment. Its progressive increase leads to rupture and massive internal bleeding, which requires the most effective medical care. However, despite the improvement in medical equipment and postoperative care, mortality due to ruptured abdominal aneurysms is still close to 50%, which is primarily related to the severity of the pathology and open surgical intervention. Materials and Methods: 46 patients diagnosed with rupture of the abdominal aorta took part in the study. Selection criteria were a history of abdominal aortic rupture, conservative/operative treatment for the disease, and absence of other complications (acute renal failure, liver infarction) that could affect the results of the study. Results: Since January 2018, 46 cases of ruptured AAAs have been diagnosed. In all forty-six cases, surgical intervention was used: open surgery or endovascular technique. All 100% of patients had a previous history of diagnosed abdominal aortic aneurysm, for which they underwent periodic ultrasound examinations. As a result of the study, it was found that endovascular aortic aneurysm correction is the optimal method for both planned and emergency treatment of aortic aneurysm and its rupture. According to the Cochrane Specialized Register, it was established that endovascular repair is associated with a reduction in early morbidity and mortality after abdominal aneurysm, compared with other methods of surgical treatment. Furthermore, the study found that, unlike open surgery methods, endovascular techniques are associated with a lower risk of complications in the form of intestinal ischemia. Conclusions: Inferior quality studies and lack of information limit the conclusions of this review. From the statistical data shown in this paper, it can be concluded that there is a difference between endovascular and open methods of treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture. Mortality within the first 30 days after treatment and short-term complications are significantly lower in patients using EVAR. Systemic complications are also more prevalent in patients who were prescribed open surgical treatment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腹部动脉瘤破裂的紧急治疗
导言腹部动脉瘤被认为是一种需要及时治疗的可怕病症。动脉瘤逐渐增大会导致破裂和大量内出血,需要最有效的医疗护理。然而,尽管医疗设备和术后护理有所改善,但腹部动脉瘤破裂导致的死亡率仍接近 50%,这主要与病理的严重程度和开放性手术干预有关。材料和方法:46 名确诊为腹主动脉破裂的患者参与了研究。选择标准是:有腹主动脉破裂病史、对疾病进行过保守/手术治疗、没有可能影响研究结果的其他并发症(急性肾功能衰竭、肝梗塞)。结果:自2018年1月以来,共诊断出46例AAA破裂病例。在所有 46 例病例中,均采用了手术干预:开放手术或血管内技术。所有 100%的患者均有腹主动脉瘤确诊病史,并为此定期接受超声检查。研究结果表明,血管内主动脉瘤矫正术是计划内和紧急治疗主动脉瘤及其破裂的最佳方法。根据科克伦专门登记册,与其他手术治疗方法相比,血管内修复术可降低腹主动脉瘤的早期发病率和死亡率。此外,研究还发现,与开腹手术方法不同,血管内技术引起肠缺血并发症的风险较低。结论:劣质研究和信息匮乏限制了本综述的结论。从本文显示的统计数据中可以得出结论,治疗腹主动脉瘤破裂的血管内手术和开放手术方法存在差异。使用 EVAR 的患者在治疗后 30 天内的死亡率和短期并发症明显较低。在接受开放手术治疗的患者中,全身并发症的发生率也更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Liver Abscess after Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. A Case Report. Study Size Impact on Accuracy of the Worldwide Incidence of Pilonidal Sinus Management of Periarthritis Shoulder by Intra-Articular Steroid Injection and Shoulder Joint Manipulation Complications of Implantation of Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Device Wernicke’s Encephalopathy from Hyperemesis Gravidarum. A Case Report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1