Our Experience in Carotid Endarterectomy. A Retrospective Study

E. Nuellari, E. Prifti
{"title":"Our Experience in Carotid Endarterectomy. A Retrospective Study","authors":"E. Nuellari, E. Prifti","doi":"10.32391/ajtes.v8i1.357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) operations have been more frequent in our practice in recent years, primarily for asymptomatic patients. In this article, we present our experience in this field. \nOjectives. Primary endpoints were death and stroke within 30 days of the procedure for asymptomatic patients. Secondary endpoints were acute myocardial infarction within 30 days of the process and peripheral nerve injury in all patients. \nPatients and Method: This is a retrospective review of our recent experience. Data of  219 consecutive CEA, 177 in asymptomatic patients, operated on from January 2004- February 2009 by our equip are collected; all the patients were diagnosed with Duplex scanner and confirmed with multi-slice CT scanner angiography. Endarterectomy was performed either with loco-regional or general anesthesia with selective use of a shunt. Combined anti-aggregation with Clopidogrel and Aspirin was the rule at discharge. Patients were controlled for new neurological and cardiac events 30 days after the operation. \nResults: One asymptomatic patient had a major stroke and died. In this group, the stroke and mortality rate is 1,69%. No peri-operative new acute myocardial infarction happened in any patient. Peripheral nerve lesions occurred in 2,7 %of all procedures. \nConclusions: CEA is a safe treatment for asymptomatic internal carotid stenoses in the hands of an experienced vascular surgeon. Our results for asymptomatic carotid stenoses are according to international guidelines' recommendations. \n ","PeriodicalId":32905,"journal":{"name":"Albanian Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery","volume":"62 26","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Albanian Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32391/ajtes.v8i1.357","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) operations have been more frequent in our practice in recent years, primarily for asymptomatic patients. In this article, we present our experience in this field. Ojectives. Primary endpoints were death and stroke within 30 days of the procedure for asymptomatic patients. Secondary endpoints were acute myocardial infarction within 30 days of the process and peripheral nerve injury in all patients. Patients and Method: This is a retrospective review of our recent experience. Data of  219 consecutive CEA, 177 in asymptomatic patients, operated on from January 2004- February 2009 by our equip are collected; all the patients were diagnosed with Duplex scanner and confirmed with multi-slice CT scanner angiography. Endarterectomy was performed either with loco-regional or general anesthesia with selective use of a shunt. Combined anti-aggregation with Clopidogrel and Aspirin was the rule at discharge. Patients were controlled for new neurological and cardiac events 30 days after the operation. Results: One asymptomatic patient had a major stroke and died. In this group, the stroke and mortality rate is 1,69%. No peri-operative new acute myocardial infarction happened in any patient. Peripheral nerve lesions occurred in 2,7 %of all procedures. Conclusions: CEA is a safe treatment for asymptomatic internal carotid stenoses in the hands of an experienced vascular surgeon. Our results for asymptomatic carotid stenoses are according to international guidelines' recommendations.  
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我们的颈动脉内膜切除术经验。回顾性研究
导言:近年来,颈动脉内膜剥脱术(CEA)手术在我们的临床实践中越来越频繁,主要针对无症状患者。本文将介绍我们在这一领域的经验。目标。主要终点是无症状患者术后 30 天内的死亡和中风。次要终点是手术后 30 天内的急性心肌梗死和所有患者的周围神经损伤。患者和方法:这是对我们近期经验的回顾性总结。我们收集了本设备在2004年1月至2009年2月期间连续进行的219例CEA手术数据,其中177例为无症状患者;所有患者均通过双相扫描仪确诊,并通过多层CT扫描仪血管造影确认。动脉内膜切除术在局部麻醉或全身麻醉下进行,并选择性地使用分流器。出院时,医生会使用氯吡格雷和阿司匹林联合抗凝。术后30天对患者进行新的神经和心脏事件控制。结果:一名无症状患者发生严重中风并死亡。该组患者的中风和死亡率为 1.69%。没有任何患者在围手术期发生新的急性心肌梗死。外周神经损伤发生率占所有手术的 2.7%。结论在经验丰富的血管外科医生手中,CEA 是治疗无症状颈内动脉狭窄的安全方法。我们对无症状颈动脉狭窄的治疗结果符合国际指南的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Liver Abscess after Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. A Case Report. Study Size Impact on Accuracy of the Worldwide Incidence of Pilonidal Sinus Management of Periarthritis Shoulder by Intra-Articular Steroid Injection and Shoulder Joint Manipulation Complications of Implantation of Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Device Wernicke’s Encephalopathy from Hyperemesis Gravidarum. A Case Report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1