Developing and validating a team cultural intelligence scale

Joost Bücker, Hubert Korzilius
{"title":"Developing and validating a team cultural intelligence scale","authors":"Joost Bücker,&nbsp;Hubert Korzilius","doi":"10.1111/apps.12521","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>With a social–cognitive framework, this article presents the further development and a six-step validation procedure for a team cultural intelligence (TCQ) scale that measures the abilities that cross-cultural teams need to perform vital tasks, extract information, and make decisions by leveraging the unique perspectives of diverse team members. In the first step, the confirmation of the content validity of the instrument is based on extant literature, which indicates a second-order latent factor TCQ and five first-order latent dimensions. The other validity tests appear in four empirical studies with different samples, mainly of employees working in cross-cultural teams. Reliability testing shows that, after the removal of one item, TCQ and its dimensions attain adequate to good reliability, leading to a 20-item TCQ scale. The third step reveals robust psychometric properties, in support of the assumed factor structure, and points to adequate convergent and discriminant validity. Next, tests indicate nomological and criterion-related validity of TCQ and its dimensions in relation to team performance outcomes and other team characteristics. Finally, in the sixth validation step, TCQ exhibits incremental validity for explaining variance in innovative work behavior, beyond team members' individual CQ. These findings have relevant implications and suggest avenues for further research.</p>","PeriodicalId":48289,"journal":{"name":"Applied Psychology-An International Review-Psychologie Appliquee-Revue Internationale","volume":"73 3","pages":"1386-1415"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/apps.12521","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Psychology-An International Review-Psychologie Appliquee-Revue Internationale","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/apps.12521","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With a social–cognitive framework, this article presents the further development and a six-step validation procedure for a team cultural intelligence (TCQ) scale that measures the abilities that cross-cultural teams need to perform vital tasks, extract information, and make decisions by leveraging the unique perspectives of diverse team members. In the first step, the confirmation of the content validity of the instrument is based on extant literature, which indicates a second-order latent factor TCQ and five first-order latent dimensions. The other validity tests appear in four empirical studies with different samples, mainly of employees working in cross-cultural teams. Reliability testing shows that, after the removal of one item, TCQ and its dimensions attain adequate to good reliability, leading to a 20-item TCQ scale. The third step reveals robust psychometric properties, in support of the assumed factor structure, and points to adequate convergent and discriminant validity. Next, tests indicate nomological and criterion-related validity of TCQ and its dimensions in relation to team performance outcomes and other team characteristics. Finally, in the sixth validation step, TCQ exhibits incremental validity for explaining variance in innovative work behavior, beyond team members' individual CQ. These findings have relevant implications and suggest avenues for further research.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开发并验证团队文化智能量表
本文以社会认知框架为基础,介绍了团队文化智能(TCQ)量表的进一步开发和六步验证程序,该量表用于测量跨文化团队利用不同团队成员的独特视角执行重要任务、提取信息和做出决策所需的能力。第一步,根据现有文献确认量表的内容效度,该文献指出了一个二阶潜因子 TCQ 和五个一阶潜维度。其他的效度测试出现在四项不同样本的实证研究中,这些样本主要是在跨文化团队中工作的员工。信度测试表明,在删除一个项目后,TCQ 及其维度的信度达到了足够高的水平,从而形成了一个 20 个项目的 TCQ 量表。第三步显示了稳健的心理测量特性,支持假定的因子结构,并指出了充分的收敛性和判别效度。接下来,测试表明 TCQ 及其维度与团队绩效结果和其他团队特征相关的名义有效性和标准相关有效性。最后,在第六个验证步骤中,TCQ 在解释团队成员个人 CQ 之外的创新工作行为差异方面表现出增量有效性。这些发现具有相关意义,并为进一步研究提供了途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
5.60%
发文量
84
期刊介绍: "Applied Psychology: An International Review" is the esteemed official journal of the International Association of Applied Psychology (IAAP), a venerable organization established in 1920 that unites scholars and practitioners in the field of applied psychology. This peer-reviewed journal serves as a global platform for the scholarly exchange of research findings within the diverse domain of applied psychology. The journal embraces a wide array of topics within applied psychology, including organizational, cross-cultural, educational, health, counseling, environmental, traffic, and sport psychology. It particularly encourages submissions that enhance the understanding of psychological processes in various applied settings and studies that explore the impact of different national and cultural contexts on psychological phenomena.
期刊最新文献
Language proficiency and cultural intelligence: A meta-analysis based on conservation of resources theory and the overt-covert model of culture Is a creative leader always helpful? A dependency perspective on the relationship between leader creativity and follower creativity Deeds speak louder than words: Employees' responses to supervisors' word-oriented and deed-oriented voice endorsement The reciprocal within-person relationship between job insecurity and life satisfaction: Testing loss and gain spirals with two large-scale longitudinal studies Make an environmental impact beyond organizational boundaries through green leisure crafting of employees
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1