The Perspectives of People With Disabilities on the Characteristics and Conditions Remote Work: The Thematic and Dual Sentiment Analysis

Q4 Psychology Roczniki Psychologiczne Pub Date : 2024-01-04 DOI:10.18290/rpsych2023.0018
Anita Pollak, Magdalena Ślazyk-Sobol, Izabela Rusin, Małgorzata Klich, Tomasz Lis, Małgorzata Dobrowolska
{"title":"The Perspectives of People With Disabilities on the Characteristics and Conditions Remote Work: The Thematic and Dual Sentiment Analysis","authors":"Anita Pollak, Magdalena Ślazyk-Sobol, Izabela Rusin, Małgorzata Klich, Tomasz Lis, Małgorzata Dobrowolska","doi":"10.18290/rpsych2023.0018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Remote work issues for disabled people are still poorly understood. Due to the high unemployment rate among disabled people, analysis, and solutions to increase access to work are necessary. Remote workers must deal with space, time, and the blurring of boundaries between home and work life. Remote contact also weakens management-coworker relationships, reducing workplace support and professional development. The aim of the paper was to collect opinions on remote work based on interviews with 15 people with disabilities. Their opinions expressed their experience with the reality in which they function. Dual Sentiment Analysis was used with a dedicated qualitative analysis tool (QDA MINER). The respondents mainly described remote work as having good working conditions at home and being satisfied with less contact with others. Our findings suggest that organizing remote work for people with disabilities in a highly individualized way that takes into account their disabilities, job functions, and complex emotional responses can improve job satisfaction and the work environment. Remote work reduces social contact, which reduces stress and boosts job satisfaction for disabled people.","PeriodicalId":38005,"journal":{"name":"Roczniki Psychologiczne","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Roczniki Psychologiczne","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18290/rpsych2023.0018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Remote work issues for disabled people are still poorly understood. Due to the high unemployment rate among disabled people, analysis, and solutions to increase access to work are necessary. Remote workers must deal with space, time, and the blurring of boundaries between home and work life. Remote contact also weakens management-coworker relationships, reducing workplace support and professional development. The aim of the paper was to collect opinions on remote work based on interviews with 15 people with disabilities. Their opinions expressed their experience with the reality in which they function. Dual Sentiment Analysis was used with a dedicated qualitative analysis tool (QDA MINER). The respondents mainly described remote work as having good working conditions at home and being satisfied with less contact with others. Our findings suggest that organizing remote work for people with disabilities in a highly individualized way that takes into account their disabilities, job functions, and complex emotional responses can improve job satisfaction and the work environment. Remote work reduces social contact, which reduces stress and boosts job satisfaction for disabled people.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
残疾人对远程工作特点和条件的看法:专题和双重情感分析
人们对残疾人的远程工作问题仍然知之甚少。由于残疾人的失业率很高,因此有必要进行分析并提出解决方案,以增加工作机会。远程工作者必须处理好空间、时间以及家庭与工作生活之间界限模糊的问题。远程接触还会削弱管理层与员工之间的关系,减少工作场所的支持和专业发展。本文旨在通过对 15 名残疾人的访谈,收集他们对远程工作的看法。他们的意见表达了他们对现实工作环境的体验。使用专用定性分析工具(QDA MINER)进行了双重情感分析。受访者主要将远程工作描述为在家中拥有良好的工作条件,以及对较少与他人接触感到满意。我们的研究结果表明,考虑到残疾人的残疾、工作职能和复杂的情绪反应,以高度个性化的方式为他们安排远程工作,可以提高工作满意度,改善工作环境。远程工作减少了社会接触,从而减轻了压力,提高了残疾人的工作满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Roczniki Psychologiczne
Roczniki Psychologiczne Psychology-Psychology (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: Roczniki Psychologiczne / Annals of Psychology, the continuation of Annals of Philosophy: Psychology, is an academic journal edited by The Scientific Society of the John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin [Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL]. It aims to present up-to-date and original empirical results and influential theoretical considerations in various areas of psychology as well as to promote new and creative ideas in research and psychological methods. The Journal accepts contributions of three kinds: 1) original peer reviewed articles on both empirical and conceptual topics, 2) short communications, and 3) polemics, which consist of a focus article followed by peer commentaries and a response by the author of the focus article.
期刊最新文献
Polish Adaptation and Validation of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire for Children (PSWQ-C): Factor Structure, Reliability and Validity Item Analysis of Sociocultural Influences in Verbal Ability Testing Using the Woodcock-Johnson II COG Conflict and Facilitation Between Work and Family Roles and Goal Realization in Entrepreneurs Emotional Experiences and Their Connection With Coping Strategies During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Gender Differences Do Narcissists Play Solo? Differences in Self-Efficacy and Narcissism Among Band and Solo Musicians
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1