Item Analysis of Sociocultural Influences in Verbal Ability Testing Using the Woodcock-Johnson II COG

Q4 Psychology Roczniki Psychologiczne Pub Date : 2024-05-09 DOI:10.18290/rpsych2024.0006
Tomáš Mrhálek, Alena Hricová, S. Ondrášek
{"title":"Item Analysis of Sociocultural Influences in Verbal Ability Testing Using the Woodcock-Johnson II COG","authors":"Tomáš Mrhálek, Alena Hricová, S. Ondrášek","doi":"10.18290/rpsych2024.0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article presents the results of a study that examines the impact of sociocultural environment on the development of verbal skills in Romani children aged 7–11 years, with a particular emphasis on children from socially excluded localities. The results are based on a verbal test derived from the Woodcock-Johnson Cognitive Ability Test (WJ IV COG), which was processed using item analysis according to the Rasch model. The main results are based on analysing the differential function of individual items within the verbal tests within the research group (N = 399) compared to the normative sample of the Czech population (N = 936). A secondary goal is to compare Romani children originating from socially excluded areas (N = 204) with those from non-excluded areas (N = 195). Regarding item comparisons between the majority and sample groups, they reveal significant disparities in 14 items (70%) of the Synonyms subtest and 9 items (45%) of the Antonyms subtest. The results highlight the crucial role of a more limited vocabulary, particularly in formal linguistic expressions by Romani children. The presented words representing differently functioning items can also serve as a basis for linguistic analysis and can be applied in assessing educational needs. When comparing the group of children based on their residence in a socially excluded locality, significant differences in the DIF were identified for one item from the Synonyms subtest and three items from the Antonyms subtest.","PeriodicalId":38005,"journal":{"name":"Roczniki Psychologiczne","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Roczniki Psychologiczne","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18290/rpsych2024.0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article presents the results of a study that examines the impact of sociocultural environment on the development of verbal skills in Romani children aged 7–11 years, with a particular emphasis on children from socially excluded localities. The results are based on a verbal test derived from the Woodcock-Johnson Cognitive Ability Test (WJ IV COG), which was processed using item analysis according to the Rasch model. The main results are based on analysing the differential function of individual items within the verbal tests within the research group (N = 399) compared to the normative sample of the Czech population (N = 936). A secondary goal is to compare Romani children originating from socially excluded areas (N = 204) with those from non-excluded areas (N = 195). Regarding item comparisons between the majority and sample groups, they reveal significant disparities in 14 items (70%) of the Synonyms subtest and 9 items (45%) of the Antonyms subtest. The results highlight the crucial role of a more limited vocabulary, particularly in formal linguistic expressions by Romani children. The presented words representing differently functioning items can also serve as a basis for linguistic analysis and can be applied in assessing educational needs. When comparing the group of children based on their residence in a socially excluded locality, significant differences in the DIF were identified for one item from the Synonyms subtest and three items from the Antonyms subtest.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用伍德科克-约翰逊 II COG 对言语能力测试中的社会文化影响进行项目分析
文章介绍了一项研究的结果,该研究探讨了社会文化环境对 7-11 岁罗姆儿童言语能力发展的影响,重点是来自受社会排斥地区的儿童。研究结果基于从伍德科克-约翰逊认知能力测验(WJ IV COG)中衍生出来的言语测验,该测验根据拉施模型采用项目分析法进行处理。主要结果基于对研究组(N = 399)与捷克人口常模样本(N = 936)的言语测试中单个项目的差异功能的分析。另一个目标是将来自社会排斥地区的罗姆儿童(N = 204)与来自非排斥地区的罗姆儿童(N = 195)进行比较。关于多数群体和样本群体之间的项目比较,结果显示在同义词子测试的 14 个项目(70%)和反义词子测试的 9 个项目(45%)中存在显著差异。结果凸显了词汇量有限的关键作用,尤其是在罗姆儿童的正式语言表达中。所呈现的代表不同功能项目的词汇也可作为语言分析的基础,并可用于评估教育需求。在对居住在受社会排斥地区的儿童群体进行比较时,发现同义词子测试中的一个项目和反义词子测试中的三个项目在 DIF 上存在显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Roczniki Psychologiczne
Roczniki Psychologiczne Psychology-Psychology (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: Roczniki Psychologiczne / Annals of Psychology, the continuation of Annals of Philosophy: Psychology, is an academic journal edited by The Scientific Society of the John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin [Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL]. It aims to present up-to-date and original empirical results and influential theoretical considerations in various areas of psychology as well as to promote new and creative ideas in research and psychological methods. The Journal accepts contributions of three kinds: 1) original peer reviewed articles on both empirical and conceptual topics, 2) short communications, and 3) polemics, which consist of a focus article followed by peer commentaries and a response by the author of the focus article.
期刊最新文献
Polish Adaptation and Validation of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire for Children (PSWQ-C): Factor Structure, Reliability and Validity Item Analysis of Sociocultural Influences in Verbal Ability Testing Using the Woodcock-Johnson II COG Conflict and Facilitation Between Work and Family Roles and Goal Realization in Entrepreneurs Emotional Experiences and Their Connection With Coping Strategies During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Gender Differences Do Narcissists Play Solo? Differences in Self-Efficacy and Narcissism Among Band and Solo Musicians
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1