“They Need to Go in There”: Criminalized Subjectivity among Formerly Incarcerated Black Men

Lucius Couloute
{"title":"“They Need to Go in There”: Criminalized Subjectivity among Formerly Incarcerated Black Men","authors":"Lucius Couloute","doi":"10.1177/23780231231224630","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Black people are overrepresented in the American criminal justice system, yet policy-based criminal justice research has historically ignored the perspectives of criminalized Black people. Using interviews with 27 formerly incarcerated Black men, the author helps address this issue by exploring how carceral experiences produce “criminalized subjectivities.” In particular, when explicitly asked about what they would say to powerful state officials about their contact with the criminal justice system, the Black men in this study described a range of practices and policies they viewed as unfair and contradictory. Interviewees discussed: unequal judicial processes, inhumane prison conditions, postimprisonment barriers to reintegration, and the rigged nature of racialized mass criminalization. The author argues that, taken together, their responses constitute a critical perspective urging structural (rather than individual-level) change, rooted in experiences with invisibilization and criminalization.","PeriodicalId":513351,"journal":{"name":"Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World","volume":"23 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23780231231224630","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Black people are overrepresented in the American criminal justice system, yet policy-based criminal justice research has historically ignored the perspectives of criminalized Black people. Using interviews with 27 formerly incarcerated Black men, the author helps address this issue by exploring how carceral experiences produce “criminalized subjectivities.” In particular, when explicitly asked about what they would say to powerful state officials about their contact with the criminal justice system, the Black men in this study described a range of practices and policies they viewed as unfair and contradictory. Interviewees discussed: unequal judicial processes, inhumane prison conditions, postimprisonment barriers to reintegration, and the rigged nature of racialized mass criminalization. The author argues that, taken together, their responses constitute a critical perspective urging structural (rather than individual-level) change, rooted in experiences with invisibilization and criminalization.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
"他们需要进去":曾被监禁的黑人男子的犯罪主观性
黑人在美国刑事司法系统中所占比例过高,但基于政策的刑事司法研究历来忽视被定罪黑人的观点。作者通过对 27 名曾被监禁的黑人男子进行访谈,探讨了监禁经历如何产生 "犯罪化的主体性",从而有助于解决这一问题。特别是,当被明确问及他们会就自己与刑事司法系统的接触向有权有势的国家官员说些什么时,本研究中的黑人男子描述了一系列他们认为不公平且自相矛盾的做法和政策。受访者讨论了:不平等的司法程序、不人道的监狱条件、入狱后重新融入社会的障碍,以及种族化大规模定罪的操纵性。作者认为,综合来看,他们的回答构成了一种批判性视角,敦促进行结构性(而非个人层面)变革,这种变革植根于无形化和犯罪化的经历中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Framing Welfare Expansion: Citizenship, Collective Memory, and Fiscal Dilemmas in Mexico and Peru Visualizing Concentrations of Couples and Same-Sex Couples across U.S. Counties Political Polarization and the Dynamics between Actual Income and Perceived Income Inequality in the United States, 1987 to 2021 “They Need to Go in There”: Criminalized Subjectivity among Formerly Incarcerated Black Men Black Disadvantage or Advantage? Misalignment between State and Popular Understandings of Blackness in Mexico
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1