Changes in Americans’ Views on Who Should Provide and Pay for Assistance to Older Adults with Activity Limitations, 2012 to 2022

Sarah E. Patterson, Adriana M. Reyes
{"title":"Changes in Americans’ Views on Who Should Provide and Pay for Assistance to Older Adults with Activity Limitations, 2012 to 2022","authors":"Sarah E. Patterson, Adriana M. Reyes","doi":"10.1177/23780231231225574","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An aging U.S. population means more older adults in need of care over time. Although government programs that supply financial support for older adults receive high levels of backing, social norms dictate that when it comes to care, families should be held responsible. Although families do provide most of the care older adults receive, it can often be in balance with more formal provisions such as paid care. However, there is a divide between what older people themselves feel is best compared with other groups. The authors ask, What are American attitudes toward the provision of elder care and payment for such care, how have these attitudes changed in the past decade, and are there differences by age? The authors use cross-sectional data from the 2012 and 2022 General Social Survey and find that younger adults were more likely to support government provision and payment for elder care over time.","PeriodicalId":513351,"journal":{"name":"Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World","volume":"50 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23780231231225574","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An aging U.S. population means more older adults in need of care over time. Although government programs that supply financial support for older adults receive high levels of backing, social norms dictate that when it comes to care, families should be held responsible. Although families do provide most of the care older adults receive, it can often be in balance with more formal provisions such as paid care. However, there is a divide between what older people themselves feel is best compared with other groups. The authors ask, What are American attitudes toward the provision of elder care and payment for such care, how have these attitudes changed in the past decade, and are there differences by age? The authors use cross-sectional data from the 2012 and 2022 General Social Survey and find that younger adults were more likely to support government provision and payment for elder care over time.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2012 年至 2022 年美国人对由谁为活动受限老年人提供援助和支付援助费用的看法的变化
美国人口老龄化意味着随着时间的推移,需要护理的老年人会越来越多。虽然为老年人提供经济支持的政府计划得到了高度支持,但社会规范规定,在护理方面,家庭应承担责任。尽管家庭确实为老年人提供了大部分护理服务,但这往往与有偿护理等更为正式的服务相平衡。然而,与其他群体相比,老年人自己认为最好的护理方式之间存在分歧。作者问:美国人对提供老年人护理和支付此类护理费用的态度如何,这些态度在过去十年中发生了怎样的变化,是否存在年龄差异?作者使用了 2012 年和 2022 年一般社会调查的横截面数据,发现随着时间的推移,年轻的成年人更有可能支持由政府提供和支付老年人护理费用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Framing Welfare Expansion: Citizenship, Collective Memory, and Fiscal Dilemmas in Mexico and Peru Visualizing Concentrations of Couples and Same-Sex Couples across U.S. Counties Political Polarization and the Dynamics between Actual Income and Perceived Income Inequality in the United States, 1987 to 2021 “They Need to Go in There”: Criminalized Subjectivity among Formerly Incarcerated Black Men Black Disadvantage or Advantage? Misalignment between State and Popular Understandings of Blackness in Mexico
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1