Positive Airway Pressure Therapy Compliance in Patients With Comorbid Insomnia and Sleep Apnea.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-31 DOI:10.21053/ceo.2023.00017
Mi Rye Bae, Young-Ha Lee, Sei Won Lee, Seokhoon Chung, Yoo-Sam Chung
{"title":"Positive Airway Pressure Therapy Compliance in Patients With Comorbid Insomnia and Sleep Apnea.","authors":"Mi Rye Bae, Young-Ha Lee, Sei Won Lee, Seokhoon Chung, Yoo-Sam Chung","doi":"10.21053/ceo.2023.00017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to compare positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy compliance between patients with comorbid insomnia and sleep apnea (COMISA) and those with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) alone. It also assessed the influence of insomnia clinic visits on PAP compliance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients diagnosed with OSA and initiated on PAP therapy between January 2012 and December 2021 were included. The COMISA group (n=43) comprised patients with insomnia, while the control group (n=86) consisted of OSA patients without insomnia, matched 1:2 based on age and sex. COMISA patients were further categorized into group A (n=20), with at least two insomnia clinic visits, and group B (n=23) with one or no visits. PAP compliance in each group was evaluated at 3 and 9 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences were observed in PAP compliance between the COMISA patients and OSA patients without insomnia. Within the COMISA group, the impact of insomnia clinic visits on PAP compliance was not significant. No significant difference was observed in daily PAP usage between the two groups at 3 months (265.5±145.9 minutes in group A vs. 236.3±152.3 minutes in group B, P=0.760) or 9 months (213.4±155.3 minutes in group A vs. 166.3±158.3 minutes in group B, P=0.538). The percentages of PAP users and nights with PAP use exceeding 4 hours also showed no significant differences at either time point.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrated no significant disparity in PAP compliance between the COMISA and OSA groups at either 3 or 9 months. Furthermore, insomnia clinic visits did not significantly impact PAP compliance in COMISA patients during 3- and 9-month intervals.</p>","PeriodicalId":10318,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology","volume":" ","pages":"116-121"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11151002/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21053/ceo.2023.00017","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to compare positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy compliance between patients with comorbid insomnia and sleep apnea (COMISA) and those with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) alone. It also assessed the influence of insomnia clinic visits on PAP compliance.

Methods: Patients diagnosed with OSA and initiated on PAP therapy between January 2012 and December 2021 were included. The COMISA group (n=43) comprised patients with insomnia, while the control group (n=86) consisted of OSA patients without insomnia, matched 1:2 based on age and sex. COMISA patients were further categorized into group A (n=20), with at least two insomnia clinic visits, and group B (n=23) with one or no visits. PAP compliance in each group was evaluated at 3 and 9 months.

Results: No significant differences were observed in PAP compliance between the COMISA patients and OSA patients without insomnia. Within the COMISA group, the impact of insomnia clinic visits on PAP compliance was not significant. No significant difference was observed in daily PAP usage between the two groups at 3 months (265.5±145.9 minutes in group A vs. 236.3±152.3 minutes in group B, P=0.760) or 9 months (213.4±155.3 minutes in group A vs. 166.3±158.3 minutes in group B, P=0.538). The percentages of PAP users and nights with PAP use exceeding 4 hours also showed no significant differences at either time point.

Conclusion: This study demonstrated no significant disparity in PAP compliance between the COMISA and OSA groups at either 3 or 9 months. Furthermore, insomnia clinic visits did not significantly impact PAP compliance in COMISA patients during 3- and 9-month intervals.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
合并失眠和睡眠呼吸暂停(COMISA)患者对正压气道疗法的依从性。
研究目的本研究旨在比较合并失眠和睡眠呼吸暂停(COMISA)患者与单纯阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)患者的气道正压(PAP)治疗依从性,同时评估失眠门诊对气道正压治疗依从性的影响:纳入 2012 年 1 月至 2021 年 12 月期间确诊为 OSA 并开始使用 PAP 治疗的患者。COMISA组(n = 43)由失眠患者组成,对照组(n = 86)由无失眠的OSA患者组成,根据年龄和性别进行1:2配对。COMISA 患者又分为至少两次失眠门诊就诊的 A 组(n = 20)和极少或未就诊的 B 组(n = 23)。在 3 个月和 9 个月时对每组患者的 PAP 依从性进行评估:结果:COMISA 患者与无失眠症的 OSA 患者在 PAP 依从性方面无明显差异。在 COMISA 组中,失眠门诊就诊次数对 PAP 依从性的影响不大。在 3 个月(A 组为 265.5 ± 145.9 分钟,B 组为 236.3 ± 152.3 分钟,P = 0.760)或 9 个月(A 组为 213.4 ± 155.3 分钟,B 组为 166.3 ± 158.3 分钟,P = 0.538)时,两组患者每天使用 PAP 的时间无明显差异。在两个时间间隔内,呼吸机使用者和使用呼吸机超过 4 小时的夜数所占百分比也无显著差异:本研究表明,无论是 3 个月还是 9 个月,COMISA 组和对照组在呼吸机依从性方面均无明显差异。此外,在 3 个月和 9 个月期间,失眠门诊就诊对 COMISA 患者的 PAP 依从性没有明显影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
49
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology (Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol, CEO) is an international peer-reviewed journal on recent developments in diagnosis and treatment of otorhinolaryngology-head and neck surgery and dedicated to the advancement of patient care in ear, nose, throat, head, and neck disorders. This journal publishes original articles relating to both clinical and basic researches, reviews, and clinical trials, encompassing the whole topics of otorhinolaryngology-head and neck surgery. CEO was first issued in 2008 and this journal is published in English four times (the last day of February, May, August, and November) per year by the Korean Society of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. The Journal aims at publishing evidence-based, scientifically written articles from different disciplines of otorhinolaryngology field. The readership contains clinical/basic research into current practice in otorhinolaryngology, audiology, speech pathology, head and neck oncology, plastic and reconstructive surgery. The readers are otolaryngologists, head and neck surgeons and oncologists, audiologists, and speech pathologists.
期刊最新文献
Assessing the Complex Impact of Smoking Habits on Allergic Rhinitis: A National Cross-Sectional Study. Video Head Impulse Test Coherence Predicts Vertigo Recovery in Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss with Vertigo. Long-term Assessment of Speech and Swallowing Function in Laryngopharyngeal Cancer Patients After J-Flap Reconstruction. Clinical significance of gross extrathyroidal extension to only the strap muscle according to tumor size in differentiated thyroid cancer: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Consensus Statement: Postoperative Management after Balloon Dilation of the Eustachian Tube.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1