Minimum-entropy velocity estimation from GPS position time series

IF 3.9 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS Journal of Geodesy Pub Date : 2024-02-02 DOI:10.1007/s00190-023-01820-3
Jarir Saleh, Richard A. Bennett, Simon D. P. Williams
{"title":"Minimum-entropy velocity estimation from GPS position time series","authors":"Jarir Saleh, Richard A. Bennett, Simon D. P. Williams","doi":"10.1007/s00190-023-01820-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We propose a nonparametric minimum entropy method for estimating an optimal velocity from position time series, which may contain unknown noise, data gaps, loading effects, transients, outliers and step discontinuities. Although nonparametric, the proposed method is based on elementary statistical concepts familiar to least-squares and maximum-likelihood users. It seeks a constant velocity with a best possible (realistic) variance rather than a best variable velocity fit to the closest position data. We show, based on information theory, synthetic and real data, that minimum-entropy velocity estimation: (1) accounts for colored noise without assumptions about its distribution or the extent of its temporal correlations; (2) is unaffected by the series deterministic content such as an initial position and the heights of step discontinuities and insensitive to small-amplitude periodic variations and transients; (3) is robust against outliers and, for long time series, against step discontinuities and even slight non-stationarity of the noise; (4) does not involve covariance matrices or eigen/singular value analysis, thus can be implemented by a short and efficient software; (5) under no circumstances results in a velocity variance that decays as <span>\\(1/N\\)</span>, where <span>\\(N\\)</span> is the number of observations. The proposed method is verified based on synthetic data and then applied to a few hundred NGL (Nevada Geodetic Lab) position time series of different characteristics, and the results are compared to those of the Median Interannual Difference Adjusted for Skewness (MIDAS) algorithm. The compared time series include continuous and linear ones used to test the agreement between the two methods in the presence of unknown noise, data gaps and loading effects, discontinuous but linear series selected to include the effect of a few (1–4) discontinuities, and nonlinear but continuous time series selected for including the effects of transients. Both the minimum-entropy and MIDAS methods are nonparametric in the sense that they only extract the velocity from a position time series with hardly any explicit assumptions about its noise distribution or correlation structure. Otherwise, the two methods differ in every single possible technical sense. Other than pointing to a close agreement between the derived velocities, the comparisons consistently revealed that minimum-entropy velocity uncertainties suggest a smaller degree of temporal correlations in the NGL time series than the MIDAS does.</p>","PeriodicalId":54822,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geodesy","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geodesy","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-023-01820-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We propose a nonparametric minimum entropy method for estimating an optimal velocity from position time series, which may contain unknown noise, data gaps, loading effects, transients, outliers and step discontinuities. Although nonparametric, the proposed method is based on elementary statistical concepts familiar to least-squares and maximum-likelihood users. It seeks a constant velocity with a best possible (realistic) variance rather than a best variable velocity fit to the closest position data. We show, based on information theory, synthetic and real data, that minimum-entropy velocity estimation: (1) accounts for colored noise without assumptions about its distribution or the extent of its temporal correlations; (2) is unaffected by the series deterministic content such as an initial position and the heights of step discontinuities and insensitive to small-amplitude periodic variations and transients; (3) is robust against outliers and, for long time series, against step discontinuities and even slight non-stationarity of the noise; (4) does not involve covariance matrices or eigen/singular value analysis, thus can be implemented by a short and efficient software; (5) under no circumstances results in a velocity variance that decays as \(1/N\), where \(N\) is the number of observations. The proposed method is verified based on synthetic data and then applied to a few hundred NGL (Nevada Geodetic Lab) position time series of different characteristics, and the results are compared to those of the Median Interannual Difference Adjusted for Skewness (MIDAS) algorithm. The compared time series include continuous and linear ones used to test the agreement between the two methods in the presence of unknown noise, data gaps and loading effects, discontinuous but linear series selected to include the effect of a few (1–4) discontinuities, and nonlinear but continuous time series selected for including the effects of transients. Both the minimum-entropy and MIDAS methods are nonparametric in the sense that they only extract the velocity from a position time series with hardly any explicit assumptions about its noise distribution or correlation structure. Otherwise, the two methods differ in every single possible technical sense. Other than pointing to a close agreement between the derived velocities, the comparisons consistently revealed that minimum-entropy velocity uncertainties suggest a smaller degree of temporal correlations in the NGL time series than the MIDAS does.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从 GPS 定位时间序列估算最小熵速度
我们提出了一种非参数最小熵方法,用于从位置时间序列中估算出最佳速度,这些时间序列可能包含未知噪声、数据间隙、加载效应、瞬态、异常值和阶跃不连续性。虽然是非参数法,但所提出的方法基于最小二乘和最大似然法用户所熟悉的基本统计概念。它寻求的是具有最佳可能(现实)方差的恒定速度,而不是与最近位置数据拟合的最佳可变速度。我们以信息论、合成数据和真实数据为基础,证明了最小熵速度估计:(2) 不受序列确定性内容(如初始位置和阶跃不连续高度)的影响,对小振幅周期性变化和瞬态不敏感;(4) 不涉及协方差矩阵或特征/奇异值分析,因此可以通过一个简短高效的软件来实现; (5) 在任何情况下都不会导致速度方差以 \(1/N\) 的形式衰减,其中 \(N\) 是观测值的数量。基于合成数据对所提出的方法进行了验证,然后将其应用于几百个具有不同特征的 NGL(内华达大地测量实验室)位置时间序列,并将结果与经偏度调整的年际差值中值(MIDAS)算法的结果进行了比较。比较的时间序列包括连续和线性时间序列,用于测试两种方法在未知噪声、数据间隙和负载效应情况下的一致性;不连续但线性的时间序列,用于包含少数(1-4 个)不连续的影响;非线性但连续的时间序列,用于包含瞬变的影响。最小熵方法和 MIDAS 方法都是非参数方法,因为它们只从位置时间序列中提取速度,几乎不对其噪声分布或相关结构作任何明确的假设。除此之外,这两种方法在所有可能的技术意义上都存在差异。除了得出的速度接近一致外,比较结果还一致表明,最小熵速度不确定性表明 NGL 时间序列的时间相关性程度比 MIDAS 方法要小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Geodesy
Journal of Geodesy 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
85
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Geodesy is an international journal concerned with the study of scientific problems of geodesy and related interdisciplinary sciences. Peer-reviewed papers are published on theoretical or modeling studies, and on results of experiments and interpretations. Besides original research papers, the journal includes commissioned review papers on topical subjects and special issues arising from chosen scientific symposia or workshops. The journal covers the whole range of geodetic science and reports on theoretical and applied studies in research areas such as: -Positioning -Reference frame -Geodetic networks -Modeling and quality control -Space geodesy -Remote sensing -Gravity fields -Geodynamics
期刊最新文献
Gap filling between GRACE and GRACE-FO missions: assessment of interpolation techniques Modified Bayesian method for simultaneously imaging fault geometry and slip distribution with reduced uncertainty, applied to 2017 Mw 7.3 Sarpol-e Zahab (Iran) earthquake Global 3D ionospheric shape function modeling with kriging Spherical radial basis functions model: approximating an integral functional of an isotropic Gaussian random field Capture of coseismic velocity waveform using GNSS raw Doppler and carrier phase data for enhancing shaking intensity estimation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1