Estimating the population effectiveness of interventions against COVID-19 in France: A modelling study

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Epidemics Pub Date : 2024-02-02 DOI:10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100744
Iris Ganser , David L. Buckeridge , Jane Heffernan , Mélanie Prague , Rodolphe Thiébaut
{"title":"Estimating the population effectiveness of interventions against COVID-19 in France: A modelling study","authors":"Iris Ganser ,&nbsp;David L. Buckeridge ,&nbsp;Jane Heffernan ,&nbsp;Mélanie Prague ,&nbsp;Rodolphe Thiébaut","doi":"10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100744","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) and vaccines have been widely used to manage the COVID-19 pandemic. However, uncertainty persists regarding the effectiveness of these interventions due to data quality issues, methodological challenges, and differing contextual factors. Accurate estimation of their effects is crucial for future epidemic preparedness.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>To address this, we developed a population-based mechanistic model that includes the impact of NPIs and vaccines on SARS-CoV-2 transmission and hospitalization rates. Our statistical approach estimated all parameters in one step, accurately propagating uncertainty. We fitted the model to comprehensive epidemiological data in France from March 2020 to October 2021. With the same model, we simulated scenarios of vaccine rollout.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The first lockdown was the most effective, reducing transmission by 84 % (95 % confidence interval (CI) 83–85). Subsequent lockdowns had diminished effectiveness (reduction of 74 % (69–77) and 11 % (9–18), respectively). A 6 pm curfew was more effective than one at 8 pm (68 % (66–69) vs. 48 % (45–49) reduction), while school closures reduced transmission by 15 % (12–18). In a scenario without vaccines before November 2021, we predicted 159,000 or 168 % (95 % prediction interval (PI) 70-315) more deaths and 1,488,000 or 300 % (133-492) more hospitalizations. If a vaccine had been available after 100 days, over 71,000 deaths (16,507–204,249) and 384,000 (88,579–1,020,386) hospitalizations could have been averted.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our results highlight the substantial impact of NPIs, including lockdowns and curfews, in controlling the COVID-19 pandemic. We also demonstrate the value of the 100 days objective of the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI) initiative for vaccine availability.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49206,"journal":{"name":"Epidemics","volume":"46 ","pages":"Article 100744"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755436524000057/pdfft?md5=d3f74a44758a72b272e6e9dbdf0accab&pid=1-s2.0-S1755436524000057-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epidemics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755436524000057","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) and vaccines have been widely used to manage the COVID-19 pandemic. However, uncertainty persists regarding the effectiveness of these interventions due to data quality issues, methodological challenges, and differing contextual factors. Accurate estimation of their effects is crucial for future epidemic preparedness.

Methods

To address this, we developed a population-based mechanistic model that includes the impact of NPIs and vaccines on SARS-CoV-2 transmission and hospitalization rates. Our statistical approach estimated all parameters in one step, accurately propagating uncertainty. We fitted the model to comprehensive epidemiological data in France from March 2020 to October 2021. With the same model, we simulated scenarios of vaccine rollout.

Results

The first lockdown was the most effective, reducing transmission by 84 % (95 % confidence interval (CI) 83–85). Subsequent lockdowns had diminished effectiveness (reduction of 74 % (69–77) and 11 % (9–18), respectively). A 6 pm curfew was more effective than one at 8 pm (68 % (66–69) vs. 48 % (45–49) reduction), while school closures reduced transmission by 15 % (12–18). In a scenario without vaccines before November 2021, we predicted 159,000 or 168 % (95 % prediction interval (PI) 70-315) more deaths and 1,488,000 or 300 % (133-492) more hospitalizations. If a vaccine had been available after 100 days, over 71,000 deaths (16,507–204,249) and 384,000 (88,579–1,020,386) hospitalizations could have been averted.

Conclusion

Our results highlight the substantial impact of NPIs, including lockdowns and curfews, in controlling the COVID-19 pandemic. We also demonstrate the value of the 100 days objective of the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI) initiative for vaccine availability.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
估算法国 COVID-19 干预措施的人口效果:一项模型研究
背景非药物干预措施(NPI)和疫苗已被广泛用于控制 COVID-19 大流行。然而,由于数据质量问题、方法上的挑战以及不同的背景因素,这些干预措施的效果仍存在不确定性。为了解决这个问题,我们建立了一个基于人群的机理模型,其中包括非传染性肺炎疫苗和疫苗对 SARS-CoV-2 传播和住院率的影响。我们的统计方法一步估算了所有参数,准确地传播了不确定性。我们将该模型与法国 2020 年 3 月至 2021 年 10 月的综合流行病学数据进行了拟合。结果第一次封锁最为有效,传播率降低了 84%(95% 置信区间 (CI) 83-85)。随后的封锁效果有所减弱(分别减少了 74% (69-77) 和 11% (9-18))。下午 6 点的宵禁比晚上 8 点的宵禁更有效(分别减少 68% (66-69) 和 48% (45-49)),而学校关闭则减少了 15% (12-18)的传播。在 2021 年 11 月之前没有疫苗的情况下,我们预测死亡人数将增加 15.9 万或 194%(95% 预测区间 (PI) 74-424),住院人数将增加 148.8 万或 340%(136-689)。如果在 100 天后可以获得疫苗,则可以避免 71,000 多例死亡(16,507-204,249 例)和 384,000 例住院(88,579-1,020,386 例)。我们还证明了流行病防备创新联盟 (CEPI) 倡议的 100 天目标在疫苗供应方面的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Epidemics
Epidemics INFECTIOUS DISEASES-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
7.90%
发文量
92
审稿时长
140 days
期刊介绍: Epidemics publishes papers on infectious disease dynamics in the broadest sense. Its scope covers both within-host dynamics of infectious agents and dynamics at the population level, particularly the interaction between the two. Areas of emphasis include: spread, transmission, persistence, implications and population dynamics of infectious diseases; population and public health as well as policy aspects of control and prevention; dynamics at the individual level; interaction with the environment, ecology and evolution of infectious diseases, as well as population genetics of infectious agents.
期刊最新文献
Estimating the generation time for influenza transmission using household data in the United States. Reconstructing the first COVID-19 pandemic wave with minimal data in England. Retrospective modelling of the disease and mortality burden of the 1918-1920 influenza pandemic in Zurich, Switzerland. Flusion: Integrating multiple data sources for accurate influenza predictions. Infectious diseases: Household modeling with missing data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1