The Duty of Care to Protect Employees against the Risk of Psychiatric Harm from Vicarious Trauma: Kozarov v Victoria.

IF 0.6 Q2 LAW Journal of Law and Medicine Pub Date : 2023-07-01
Russ Scott, Ian Freckelton
{"title":"The Duty of Care to Protect Employees against the Risk of Psychiatric Harm from Vicarious Trauma: Kozarov v Victoria.","authors":"Russ Scott, Ian Freckelton","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An employer owes every employee a duty to take all reasonable steps to provide a safe place and system of work. Whether an employer will be liable for psychological harm suffered by an employee will depend on the particular circumstances of the case. In Kozarov v Victoria (2022) 273 CLR 115; [2022] HCA 12 (Kozarov), the High Court considered whether the Victorian Office of Public Prosecutions had been placed on notice of a risk of \"vicarious trauma\" to a solicitor employed in the Special Sexual Offenders Unit and whether it was required to make a response by taking active steps including offering a rotation to another section where the solicitor did not to have to manage cases of child rape and other sexual offences of gross depravity. The High Court also considered whether by failing to advise her employer of her developing mental illness in a timely way and not accessing the Employee Assistance Program, the solicitor had failed to take reasonable care of her mental health. The article argues that the Kozarov decision is likely to prove a landmark in terms of employers' occupational health and safety responsibilities in respect of exposure to vicarious trauma.</p>","PeriodicalId":45522,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Law and Medicine","volume":"30 2","pages":"358-389"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Law and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An employer owes every employee a duty to take all reasonable steps to provide a safe place and system of work. Whether an employer will be liable for psychological harm suffered by an employee will depend on the particular circumstances of the case. In Kozarov v Victoria (2022) 273 CLR 115; [2022] HCA 12 (Kozarov), the High Court considered whether the Victorian Office of Public Prosecutions had been placed on notice of a risk of "vicarious trauma" to a solicitor employed in the Special Sexual Offenders Unit and whether it was required to make a response by taking active steps including offering a rotation to another section where the solicitor did not to have to manage cases of child rape and other sexual offences of gross depravity. The High Court also considered whether by failing to advise her employer of her developing mental illness in a timely way and not accessing the Employee Assistance Program, the solicitor had failed to take reasonable care of her mental health. The article argues that the Kozarov decision is likely to prove a landmark in terms of employers' occupational health and safety responsibilities in respect of exposure to vicarious trauma.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
保护雇员免受因果创伤造成精神伤害风险的注意义务:科扎罗夫诉维多利亚州
雇主有责任采取一切合理措施为每位雇员提供安全的工作场所和工作制度。雇主是否需要为雇员遭受的心理伤害承担责任取决于案件的具体情况。在 Kozarov 诉维多利亚州(2022 年)273 CLR 115;[2022 年] HCA 12(Kozarov)一案中,高等法院考虑了维多利亚州检察院是否已被告知受雇于特别性犯罪股的一名律师存在 "替代性心理创伤 "的风险,以及是否需要采取积极措施做出回应,包括提供轮换到另一个部门的机会,使该律师不必处理强奸儿童和其他严重堕落的性犯罪案件。高等法院还考虑了该律师未能及时向其雇主告知其精神疾病的发展情况,也未参加雇员援助计划,是否属于未能合理照顾其精神健康的行为。文章认为,科扎罗夫案的判决很可能成为雇主在遭受替代性创伤方面的职业健康和安全责任方面的里程碑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
期刊最新文献
Termination Laws in Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand - Do They Align with Midwives' Scope of Practice? 'Truly, Madly, Deeply': Using Law to Compel Health and Lifestyle Influencers to Tell the Truth. Tasering Patients - A Bioethical Assessment of Taser Use Against Mental Health Inpatients in New Zealand. Voluntary Assisted Dying and Conscientious Objection: An Analysis from Victoria, Australia. Section 19(2) of the Health Insurance Act 1973 Prevents Prisoners Accessing Medicare: Fact or Fiction?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1