Tasering Patients - A Bioethical Assessment of Taser Use Against Mental Health Inpatients in New Zealand.

IF 0.6 Q2 LAW Journal of Law and Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-01
Christina Et Pikiuha-Billing
{"title":"Tasering Patients - A Bioethical Assessment of Taser Use Against Mental Health Inpatients in New Zealand.","authors":"Christina Et Pikiuha-Billing","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Tasers, a form of police weaponry causing neuromuscular incapacitation and extreme pain, were confirmed in 2010 to be used in New Zealand inpatient mental health units. Their use on patients, or tāngata whai ora (persons seeking wellbeing), raises ethical concerns about harm prevention, moral duties, and human rights in healthcare. The New Zealand healthcare system, grounded in principles and rights, regulates procedures to uphold fundamental rights. This article explores the ethical justifications and criticisms of taser use in mental health wards from a principlist perspective. It questions the ethical limits of State power regarding non-maleficence, beneficence, and autonomy, arguing that tasers pose disproportionate harm to vulnerable patients and undermine ethical healthcare standards. Concerns are raised to promote policy development, monitoring, and reporting, aimed at addressing the ethical issues associated with taser use in mental health settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":45522,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Law and Medicine","volume":"31 3","pages":"587-600"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Law and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Tasers, a form of police weaponry causing neuromuscular incapacitation and extreme pain, were confirmed in 2010 to be used in New Zealand inpatient mental health units. Their use on patients, or tāngata whai ora (persons seeking wellbeing), raises ethical concerns about harm prevention, moral duties, and human rights in healthcare. The New Zealand healthcare system, grounded in principles and rights, regulates procedures to uphold fundamental rights. This article explores the ethical justifications and criticisms of taser use in mental health wards from a principlist perspective. It questions the ethical limits of State power regarding non-maleficence, beneficence, and autonomy, arguing that tasers pose disproportionate harm to vulnerable patients and undermine ethical healthcare standards. Concerns are raised to promote policy development, monitoring, and reporting, aimed at addressing the ethical issues associated with taser use in mental health settings.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
泰瑟病人-泰瑟对新西兰精神健康住院病人使用的生物伦理评估。
泰瑟枪是一种导致神经肌肉丧失能力和极度疼痛的警察武器,2010年证实在新西兰精神卫生住院病房使用。它们在患者或tāngata whai ora(寻求健康的人)身上的使用,引发了对医疗保健中的伤害预防、道德义务和人权的伦理关切。新西兰的医疗保健体系以原则和权利为基础,规范维护基本权利的程序。本文从原则主义的角度探讨了在精神卫生病房使用泰瑟枪的伦理理由和批评。它质疑国家权力在非恶意、仁慈和自治方面的道德限制,认为泰瑟枪对弱势患者造成不成比例的伤害,并破坏了道德医疗标准。提出了促进政策制定、监测和报告的关切,旨在解决与在精神卫生机构中使用泰瑟枪有关的伦理问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
期刊最新文献
Termination Laws in Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand - Do They Align with Midwives' Scope of Practice? 'Truly, Madly, Deeply': Using Law to Compel Health and Lifestyle Influencers to Tell the Truth. Tasering Patients - A Bioethical Assessment of Taser Use Against Mental Health Inpatients in New Zealand. Voluntary Assisted Dying and Conscientious Objection: An Analysis from Victoria, Australia. Section 19(2) of the Health Insurance Act 1973 Prevents Prisoners Accessing Medicare: Fact or Fiction?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1