Using machine learning on new feature sets extracted from three-dimensional models of broken animal bones to classify fragments according to break agent

IF 3.1 1区 地球科学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY Journal of Human Evolution Pub Date : 2024-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jhevol.2024.103495
Katrina Yezzi-Woodley , Alexander Terwilliger , Jiafeng Li , Eric Chen , Martha Tappen , Jeff Calder , Peter Olver
{"title":"Using machine learning on new feature sets extracted from three-dimensional models of broken animal bones to classify fragments according to break agent","authors":"Katrina Yezzi-Woodley ,&nbsp;Alexander Terwilliger ,&nbsp;Jiafeng Li ,&nbsp;Eric Chen ,&nbsp;Martha Tappen ,&nbsp;Jeff Calder ,&nbsp;Peter Olver","doi":"10.1016/j.jhevol.2024.103495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Distinguishing agents of bone modification at paleoanthropological sites is an important means of understanding early hominin evolution. Fracture pattern analysis is used to help determine site formation processes, including whether hominins were hunting or scavenging for animal food resources. Determination of how these behaviors manifested in ancient human sites has major implications for our biological and behavioral evolution, including social and cognitive abilities, dietary impacts of having access to in-bone nutrients like marrow, and cultural variation in butchering and food processing practices. Nevertheless, previous analyses remain inconclusive, often suffering from lack of replicability, misuse of mathematical methods, and/or failure to overcome equifinality. In this paper, we present a new approach aimed at distinguishing bone fragments resulting from hominin and carnivore breakage. Our analysis is founded on a large collection of scanned three-dimensional models of fragmentary bone broken by known agents, to which we apply state of the art machine learning algorithms. Our classification of fragments achieves an average mean accuracy of 77% across tests, thus demonstrating notable, but not overwhelming, success for distinguishing the agent of breakage. We note that, while previous research applying such algorithms has claimed higher success rates, fundamental errors in the application of machine learning protocols suggest that the reported accuracies are unjustified and unreliable. The systematic, fully documented, and proper application of machine learning algorithms leads to an inherent reproducibility of our study, and therefore our methods hold great potential for deciphering when and where hominins first began exploiting marrow and meat, and clarifying their importance and influence on human evolution.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54805,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Human Evolution","volume":"187 ","pages":"Article 103495"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Human Evolution","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047248424000034","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Distinguishing agents of bone modification at paleoanthropological sites is an important means of understanding early hominin evolution. Fracture pattern analysis is used to help determine site formation processes, including whether hominins were hunting or scavenging for animal food resources. Determination of how these behaviors manifested in ancient human sites has major implications for our biological and behavioral evolution, including social and cognitive abilities, dietary impacts of having access to in-bone nutrients like marrow, and cultural variation in butchering and food processing practices. Nevertheless, previous analyses remain inconclusive, often suffering from lack of replicability, misuse of mathematical methods, and/or failure to overcome equifinality. In this paper, we present a new approach aimed at distinguishing bone fragments resulting from hominin and carnivore breakage. Our analysis is founded on a large collection of scanned three-dimensional models of fragmentary bone broken by known agents, to which we apply state of the art machine learning algorithms. Our classification of fragments achieves an average mean accuracy of 77% across tests, thus demonstrating notable, but not overwhelming, success for distinguishing the agent of breakage. We note that, while previous research applying such algorithms has claimed higher success rates, fundamental errors in the application of machine learning protocols suggest that the reported accuracies are unjustified and unreliable. The systematic, fully documented, and proper application of machine learning algorithms leads to an inherent reproducibility of our study, and therefore our methods hold great potential for deciphering when and where hominins first began exploiting marrow and meat, and clarifying their importance and influence on human evolution.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用机器学习从动物骨骼断裂三维模型中提取的新特征集,根据断裂剂对碎片进行分类
区分古人类遗址中骨骼改造的媒介是了解早期类人猿进化的重要手段。断裂模式分析有助于确定遗址的形成过程,包括确定人类是在狩猎还是在捡拾动物食物资源。确定这些行为在古人类遗址中的表现对我们的生物和行为进化有重大影响,包括社会和认知能力、获得骨髓等骨内营养物质对饮食的影响,以及屠宰和食物加工做法的文化差异。然而,以往的分析仍然没有定论,往往是因为缺乏可复制性、滥用数学方法和/或未能克服等效性。在本文中,我们提出了一种新的方法,旨在区分人和食肉动物断裂产生的骨头碎片。我们的分析建立在大量已知生物断裂的碎骨扫描三维模型的基础上,并对其应用了最先进的机器学习算法。我们对碎片的分类在所有测试中的平均准确率为 77%,因此在区分断裂物方面取得了显著但并非压倒性的成功。我们注意到,虽然之前应用此类算法的研究声称成功率更高,但机器学习协议应用中的基本错误表明,报告的准确率是不合理和不可靠的。机器学习算法的系统化、完整记录和正确应用使我们的研究具有内在的可重复性,因此我们的方法在破译类人最早开始利用骨髓和肉类的时间和地点,以及阐明它们对人类进化的重要性和影响方面具有巨大的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Human Evolution
Journal of Human Evolution 生物-进化生物学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
15.60%
发文量
104
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Human Evolution concentrates on publishing the highest quality papers covering all aspects of human evolution. The central focus is aimed jointly at paleoanthropological work, covering human and primate fossils, and at comparative studies of living species, including both morphological and molecular evidence. These include descriptions of new discoveries, interpretative analyses of new and previously described material, and assessments of the phylogeny and paleobiology of primate species. Submissions should address issues and questions of broad interest in paleoanthropology.
期刊最新文献
Shanidar 3 ‘rings the bell’: Virtual ribcage reconstruction and its implications for understanding the Neanderthal bauplan Divergent otolithic systems in the inner ear of Paranthropus robustus and Australopithecus africanus Interpreting statistical significance in hominin dimorphism: Power and Type I error rates for resampling tests of univariate and missing-data multivariate size dimorphism estimation methods in the fossil record Stone selection by wild chimpanzees shares patterns with Oldowan hominins The Grotte du Bison Neandertals (Arcy-sur-Cure, France)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1