Sex-disaggregated Data and Gender Stereotype Issues in the Workplace: The Nueva Ecija Academic Librarians' Experience

IF 2.5 3区 管理学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Journal of Academic Librarianship Pub Date : 2024-02-05 DOI:10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102854
Camia A. Lasig, Vanessa B. Morales, Nuelah S.J. Reyes, Richie N. Garabiles, Roselyn M. Madia, Julius Weldon L. Ragasa, Mercedita M. Reyes
{"title":"Sex-disaggregated Data and Gender Stereotype Issues in the Workplace: The Nueva Ecija Academic Librarians' Experience","authors":"Camia A. Lasig,&nbsp;Vanessa B. Morales,&nbsp;Nuelah S.J. Reyes,&nbsp;Richie N. Garabiles,&nbsp;Roselyn M. Madia,&nbsp;Julius Weldon L. Ragasa,&nbsp;Mercedita M. Reyes","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102854","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>A study on gender stereotypes experienced by academic librarians can significantly contribute to the ongoing efforts to promote inclusivity, diversity, and gender equality in the </span>academic library environment. In this light, this study sought to examine the stereotype issues that persist in academic libraries in the Philippines in the hope of offering recommendations in order to promote gender equality and build a positive image of librarianship. The quantitative method was utilized to collect sex-disaggregated data on academic librarians in Nueva Ecija, and the phenomenological qualitative method was used to gain insights on the narratives about their stereotyped experiences in the workplace. Results show that male and female academic librarians experienced various stereotypes on their physical appearance and job role. These come from their clientele, which include students, co-workers, and administrators. The majority of academic librarians claimed that despite coming across unfavorable assumptions at work, they maintain positive attitudes towards work. The study offers implications of the findings that can address stereotypes and which can serve as catalyst for image rebuilding of librarians towards inclusivity in the workplace.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47762,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0099133324000156","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A study on gender stereotypes experienced by academic librarians can significantly contribute to the ongoing efforts to promote inclusivity, diversity, and gender equality in the academic library environment. In this light, this study sought to examine the stereotype issues that persist in academic libraries in the Philippines in the hope of offering recommendations in order to promote gender equality and build a positive image of librarianship. The quantitative method was utilized to collect sex-disaggregated data on academic librarians in Nueva Ecija, and the phenomenological qualitative method was used to gain insights on the narratives about their stereotyped experiences in the workplace. Results show that male and female academic librarians experienced various stereotypes on their physical appearance and job role. These come from their clientele, which include students, co-workers, and administrators. The majority of academic librarians claimed that despite coming across unfavorable assumptions at work, they maintain positive attitudes towards work. The study offers implications of the findings that can address stereotypes and which can serve as catalyst for image rebuilding of librarians towards inclusivity in the workplace.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
工作场所的性别分类数据和性别刻板印象问题:新怡诗夏省学术图书馆员的经验
对学术图书馆员所经历的性别陈规定型观念进行研究,可以极大地促进学术图书馆环境 中的包容性、多样性和性别平等。有鉴于此,本研究试图对菲律宾学术图书馆中持续存在的陈规定型观念问题进行研究,希望能为促进性别平等和树立图书馆员的正面形象提供建议。本研究采用定量方法收集新怡诗夏省学术图书馆员的性别分类数据,并采用现象学定性方法深入了解他们对工作场所陈规定型观念经历的叙述。结果显示,男性和女性学术图书馆员在外貌和工作角色上都经历了各种刻板印象。这些成见来自他们的客户,包括学生、同事和管理人员。大多数学术图书馆员声称,尽管在工作中遇到了不利的假设,但他们仍然保持着积极的工作态度。本研究提供了研究结果的意义,这些意义可以消除陈规定型观念,并可作为图书馆员形象重建的催化剂,促进工作场所的包容性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Academic Librarianship
Journal of Academic Librarianship INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
15.40%
发文量
120
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Academic Librarianship, an international and refereed journal, publishes articles that focus on problems and issues germane to college and university libraries. JAL provides a forum for authors to present research findings and, where applicable, their practical applications and significance; analyze policies, practices, issues, and trends; speculate about the future of academic librarianship; present analytical bibliographic essays and philosophical treatises. JAL also brings to the attention of its readers information about hundreds of new and recently published books in library and information science, management, scholarly communication, and higher education. JAL, in addition, covers management and discipline-based software and information policy developments.
期刊最新文献
Understanding feelings, thoughts, and actions: Social work students and individual research consultations Growth of Knowledge Synthesis in a University Setting: Types, Disciplines, and Librarian Involvement An interdisciplinary assessment of information literacy instruction A holistic approach to understanding undergraduates: Campus engagement, library use and psychological factors The lifecycle of 3D data in academic libraries: A survey of methods and implications for information professionals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1