Nonlinearity in affect dynamics persists after accounting for the valence of daily-life events.

IF 3.4 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Emotion Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-05 DOI:10.1037/emo0001336
Niels Vanhasbroeck, Koen Niemeijer, Francis Tuerlinckx
{"title":"Nonlinearity in affect dynamics persists after accounting for the valence of daily-life events.","authors":"Niels Vanhasbroeck, Koen Niemeijer, Francis Tuerlinckx","doi":"10.1037/emo0001336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In recent years, increased attention has gone to studying nonlinear characteristics of affective time series. An example of such nonlinear features is multimodality-the presence of more than one mode in an affective time series-which might mark the presence of discrete-like transitions between one and another affective state. In an attempt to capture these nonlinear features, Loossens et al. (2020) proposed the Affective Ising Model (AIM) as a model of affect dynamics. This model was validated on daily-life data, but these data did not contain any information on potential environmental factors that might have influenced a participant's affective state. Unfortunately, this omission may have led to erroneously concluding that nonlinearity is a defining characteristic of the affective system, even when it is solely driven by extrinsic influences. To accommodate this limitation, we applied the AIM on daily-life data in which the valence of such external events was measured. Overall, we found that nonlinearity persisted after accounting for the valence of daily-life events, suggesting that nonlinearity is a defining characteristic of affect and should thus be accounted for. Interestingly, this effect was more pronounced for composite compared to single-item measures of affect. While in line with previous research, these results should be replicated in a larger, more representative sample. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48417,"journal":{"name":"Emotion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emotion","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0001336","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, increased attention has gone to studying nonlinear characteristics of affective time series. An example of such nonlinear features is multimodality-the presence of more than one mode in an affective time series-which might mark the presence of discrete-like transitions between one and another affective state. In an attempt to capture these nonlinear features, Loossens et al. (2020) proposed the Affective Ising Model (AIM) as a model of affect dynamics. This model was validated on daily-life data, but these data did not contain any information on potential environmental factors that might have influenced a participant's affective state. Unfortunately, this omission may have led to erroneously concluding that nonlinearity is a defining characteristic of the affective system, even when it is solely driven by extrinsic influences. To accommodate this limitation, we applied the AIM on daily-life data in which the valence of such external events was measured. Overall, we found that nonlinearity persisted after accounting for the valence of daily-life events, suggesting that nonlinearity is a defining characteristic of affect and should thus be accounted for. Interestingly, this effect was more pronounced for composite compared to single-item measures of affect. While in line with previous research, these results should be replicated in a larger, more representative sample. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在考虑了日常生活事件的价值之后,情感动态的非线性仍然存在。
近年来,人们越来越关注对情感时间序列非线性特征的研究。此类非线性特征的一个例子是多模式--情感时间序列中存在不止一种模式--这可能标志着一种情感状态与另一种情感状态之间存在离散式转换。为了捕捉这些非线性特征,Loossens 等人(2020 年)提出了情感伊辛模型(AIM)作为情感动态模型。该模型在日常生活数据中得到了验证,但这些数据并不包含任何可能影响参与者情感状态的潜在环境因素的信息。不幸的是,这一遗漏可能会导致我们错误地得出结论:非线性是情感系统的一个决定性特征,即使它完全是由外在影响因素驱动的。为了适应这一局限性,我们将 AIM 应用于日常生活数据中,对此类外部事件的价值进行了测量。总的来说,我们发现在考虑了日常生活事件的价值之后,非线性仍然存在,这表明非线性是情感的一个决定性特征,因此应该被考虑在内。有趣的是,与单项情感测量相比,这种效应在复合情感测量中更为明显。虽然这些结果与之前的研究结果一致,但仍需在更大规模、更具代表性的样本中进行验证。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Emotion
Emotion PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
325
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Emotion publishes significant contributions to the study of emotion from a wide range of theoretical traditions and research domains. The journal includes articles that advance knowledge and theory about all aspects of emotional processes, including reports of substantial empirical studies, scholarly reviews, and major theoretical articles. Submissions from all domains of emotion research are encouraged, including studies focusing on cultural, social, temperament and personality, cognitive, developmental, health, or biological variables that affect or are affected by emotional functioning. Both laboratory and field studies are appropriate for the journal, as are neuroimaging studies of emotional processes.
期刊最新文献
Loneliness and emotion regulation: A meta-analytic review. Regulating and emerging: Extrinsic affect improvement and the emergence of leadership. Learning to suppress what I fear. Behavioral and neural evidence for difficulty recognizing masked emotional faces. Empathic accuracy and interpersonal emotion regulation in close relationships.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1