Behavioral and neural evidence for difficulty recognizing masked emotional faces.

IF 3.4 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Emotion Pub Date : 2024-11-11 DOI:10.1037/emo0001444
Yael Waizman, Anthony G Vaccaro, Phillip Newsome, Elizabeth C Aviv, Gabriel A León, Sara R Berzenski, Darby E Saxbe
{"title":"Behavioral and neural evidence for difficulty recognizing masked emotional faces.","authors":"Yael Waizman, Anthony G Vaccaro, Phillip Newsome, Elizabeth C Aviv, Gabriel A León, Sara R Berzenski, Darby E Saxbe","doi":"10.1037/emo0001444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Facial emotion recognition is vital for human social behavior. During the COVID-19 pandemic, face masks were widely adopted for viral mitigation and remain crucial public health tools. However, questions persist about their impact on emotion recognition and neural processing, especially in children, parents, and young adults. We developed the Masked Affective and Social Cognition task, featuring masked and unmasked faces displaying fear, sadness, and anger. We recruited three racial and ethnically diverse samples: 119 college students, 30 children who entered school age at the beginning of the pandemic, and 31 fathers of the aforementioned children. Of the latter two groups, 41 participants (<i>n</i> = 23 fathers, 18 children) did the Masked Affective and Social Cognition task during a neuroimaging scan, while the remaining 20 participants (<i>n</i> = 8 fathers, 12 children) who were not eligible for scanning completed the task during their lab visit. Behaviorally, we found that participants recognized emotions less accurately when viewing masked faces and also found an interaction of emotion by condition, such that accuracy was particularly compromised by sad masked faces. Neurally, masked faces elicited greater activation in the posterior cingulate, insula, and fusiform gyrus. Anterior insula and inferior frontal gyrus activation were driven by sad, masked faces. These results were consistent across age groups. Among fathers, activation to sad masked faces was associated with stress and depression. Overall, our findings did not depend on previous mask exposure or timing of participation during the pandemic. These results have implications for understanding face emotion recognition, empathy, and socioemotional neurodevelopment. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48417,"journal":{"name":"Emotion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emotion","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0001444","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Facial emotion recognition is vital for human social behavior. During the COVID-19 pandemic, face masks were widely adopted for viral mitigation and remain crucial public health tools. However, questions persist about their impact on emotion recognition and neural processing, especially in children, parents, and young adults. We developed the Masked Affective and Social Cognition task, featuring masked and unmasked faces displaying fear, sadness, and anger. We recruited three racial and ethnically diverse samples: 119 college students, 30 children who entered school age at the beginning of the pandemic, and 31 fathers of the aforementioned children. Of the latter two groups, 41 participants (n = 23 fathers, 18 children) did the Masked Affective and Social Cognition task during a neuroimaging scan, while the remaining 20 participants (n = 8 fathers, 12 children) who were not eligible for scanning completed the task during their lab visit. Behaviorally, we found that participants recognized emotions less accurately when viewing masked faces and also found an interaction of emotion by condition, such that accuracy was particularly compromised by sad masked faces. Neurally, masked faces elicited greater activation in the posterior cingulate, insula, and fusiform gyrus. Anterior insula and inferior frontal gyrus activation were driven by sad, masked faces. These results were consistent across age groups. Among fathers, activation to sad masked faces was associated with stress and depression. Overall, our findings did not depend on previous mask exposure or timing of participation during the pandemic. These results have implications for understanding face emotion recognition, empathy, and socioemotional neurodevelopment. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
行为和神经证据表明难以识别被遮蔽的情绪面孔。
面部情绪识别对人类社会行为至关重要。在 COVID-19 大流行期间,口罩被广泛用于病毒缓解,至今仍是重要的公共卫生工具。然而,关于口罩对情绪识别和神经处理的影响,尤其是对儿童、父母和年轻人的影响,仍然存在疑问。我们开发了 "面具情绪和社会认知任务",其中包括戴面具和不戴面具的恐惧、悲伤和愤怒面孔。我们招募了三个不同种族和民族的样本:119 名大学生、30 名在大流行开始时进入学龄期的儿童以及 31 名上述儿童的父亲。在后两组样本中,41 名参与者(n = 23 名父亲,18 名儿童)在神经影像扫描过程中完成了 "蒙面情感和社会认知 "任务,而其余 20 名不符合扫描条件的参与者(n = 8 名父亲,12 名儿童)则在实验室访问过程中完成了该任务。从行为学角度看,我们发现参与者在观看蒙面人脸时识别情绪的准确率较低,而且还发现情绪与条件之间存在交互作用,例如悲伤的蒙面人脸尤其影响准确率。从神经学角度看,蒙面人在后扣带回、岛叶和纺锤形回引起了更大的激活。悲伤的蒙面人脸则会激活岛叶前部和额叶下回。这些结果在不同年龄组之间是一致的。在父亲中,悲伤的面具面孔激活与压力和抑郁有关。总的来说,我们的研究结果并不取决于先前的面具暴露或参与大流行病的时间。这些结果对理解人脸情绪识别、移情和社会情感神经发育具有重要意义。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Emotion
Emotion PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
325
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Emotion publishes significant contributions to the study of emotion from a wide range of theoretical traditions and research domains. The journal includes articles that advance knowledge and theory about all aspects of emotional processes, including reports of substantial empirical studies, scholarly reviews, and major theoretical articles. Submissions from all domains of emotion research are encouraged, including studies focusing on cultural, social, temperament and personality, cognitive, developmental, health, or biological variables that affect or are affected by emotional functioning. Both laboratory and field studies are appropriate for the journal, as are neuroimaging studies of emotional processes.
期刊最新文献
Loneliness and emotion regulation: A meta-analytic review. Regulating and emerging: Extrinsic affect improvement and the emergence of leadership. Learning to suppress what I fear. Behavioral and neural evidence for difficulty recognizing masked emotional faces. Empathic accuracy and interpersonal emotion regulation in close relationships.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1