Pinar Cankurtaran , Michael B. Beverland , Francis J. Farrelly
{"title":"Defining design orientation: A field-based discovery approach","authors":"Pinar Cankurtaran , Michael B. Beverland , Francis J. Farrelly","doi":"10.1016/j.technovation.2023.102943","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The value of design as a means of innovation has long been recognized. More recently, interest in how design can create value has moved from a functional to a strategic focus whereby the design concept defines the way in which the whole firm competes. This is known as “design orientation,” although research on the nature of this construct remains scarce. In this exploratory study to define and unpack the nature of design orientation we follow the same process as previous research on orientations, through extrapolation from the sustained behaviours at firms that use design to drive their strategy. Empirically, we ground our definition in insights from design experts and senior managers (n = 62) within a diverse sample of “design-oriented” firms (n = 26). We identify that design orientation consists of an overarching ethos defined by four core emphases (connective, empathetic, future, and aesthetic), reflected in and reinforced by eight behaviours (catalysing, integrating, perspective taking, marrying logics, disrupting, future-proofing, design language, and brand reinforcing). In so doing, we define the design orientation construct and identify the strategic investments firms can use to leverage it for competitive advantage. We provide an agenda for future research and explore managerial challenges associated with implementation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49444,"journal":{"name":"Technovation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":11.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166497223002547/pdfft?md5=b5762014feac4b07380a209f0c626ab0&pid=1-s2.0-S0166497223002547-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technovation","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166497223002547","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The value of design as a means of innovation has long been recognized. More recently, interest in how design can create value has moved from a functional to a strategic focus whereby the design concept defines the way in which the whole firm competes. This is known as “design orientation,” although research on the nature of this construct remains scarce. In this exploratory study to define and unpack the nature of design orientation we follow the same process as previous research on orientations, through extrapolation from the sustained behaviours at firms that use design to drive their strategy. Empirically, we ground our definition in insights from design experts and senior managers (n = 62) within a diverse sample of “design-oriented” firms (n = 26). We identify that design orientation consists of an overarching ethos defined by four core emphases (connective, empathetic, future, and aesthetic), reflected in and reinforced by eight behaviours (catalysing, integrating, perspective taking, marrying logics, disrupting, future-proofing, design language, and brand reinforcing). In so doing, we define the design orientation construct and identify the strategic investments firms can use to leverage it for competitive advantage. We provide an agenda for future research and explore managerial challenges associated with implementation.
期刊介绍:
The interdisciplinary journal Technovation covers various aspects of technological innovation, exploring processes, products, and social impacts. It examines innovation in both process and product realms, including social innovations like regulatory frameworks and non-economic benefits. Topics range from emerging trends and capital for development to managing technology-intensive ventures and innovation in organizations of different sizes. It also discusses organizational structures, investment strategies for science and technology enterprises, and the roles of technological innovators. Additionally, it addresses technology transfer between developing countries and innovation across enterprise, political, and economic systems.