Thoracic empyema: aetiology, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-07 DOI:10.1097/MCP.0000000000001054
Na'im Merchant, Chantal Liu
{"title":"Thoracic empyema: aetiology, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention.","authors":"Na'im Merchant, Chantal Liu","doi":"10.1097/MCP.0000000000001054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The aim of this study was to review current key points in the aetiology, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of empyema thoracis. Early postpandemic trends have seen an increasing global incidence and evolution in the aetiology of empyema. Due to varied aetiology and typically lengthy treatment, empyema will be disproportionately affected by the rising tide of antimicrobial resistance (AMR), thus warranting attention and further research.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Multiple novel biomarkers (e.g. IL-36γ) are under investigation to aid diagnosis, while oral health assessment tools are now available for prognosticating and risk-stratifying patients with thoracic empyema. There exists an ongoing lack of evidence-based guidance surrounding antibiotic treatment duration, surgical intervention indication, and prognostic scoring utility.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Understanding aetiologies in different global regions and settings is pivotal for guiding empirical treatment. Antimicrobial resistance will make thoracic empyema increasingly challenging to treat and should prompt increased awareness of prescribing practices. Novel biomarkers are under investigation which may speed up differentiation of pleural effusion types, allowing faster cohorting of patients.Although newly identified predictors of morbidity and mortality have been suggested to be beneficial for incorporation into clinical practice, further work is required to prognosticate, risk-stratify, and standardize treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":11090,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"204-209"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCP.0000000000001054","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: The aim of this study was to review current key points in the aetiology, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of empyema thoracis. Early postpandemic trends have seen an increasing global incidence and evolution in the aetiology of empyema. Due to varied aetiology and typically lengthy treatment, empyema will be disproportionately affected by the rising tide of antimicrobial resistance (AMR), thus warranting attention and further research.

Recent findings: Multiple novel biomarkers (e.g. IL-36γ) are under investigation to aid diagnosis, while oral health assessment tools are now available for prognosticating and risk-stratifying patients with thoracic empyema. There exists an ongoing lack of evidence-based guidance surrounding antibiotic treatment duration, surgical intervention indication, and prognostic scoring utility.

Summary: Understanding aetiologies in different global regions and settings is pivotal for guiding empirical treatment. Antimicrobial resistance will make thoracic empyema increasingly challenging to treat and should prompt increased awareness of prescribing practices. Novel biomarkers are under investigation which may speed up differentiation of pleural effusion types, allowing faster cohorting of patients.Although newly identified predictors of morbidity and mortality have been suggested to be beneficial for incorporation into clinical practice, further work is required to prognosticate, risk-stratify, and standardize treatment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胸腔积液:病因、诊断、治疗和预防。
综述目的:本研究旨在回顾当前胸腔积液的病因、诊断、治疗和预防方面的要点。从流行病后的早期趋势来看,肺水肿在全球的发病率越来越高,病因也在不断演变。由于病因多样且治疗时间通常较长,在抗菌药耐药性(AMR)不断上升的浪潮中,胸腔积液将受到不成比例的影响,因此值得关注和进一步研究:目前正在研究多种新型生物标志物(如 IL-36γ)以帮助诊断,而口腔健康评估工具现在也可用于胸腔积液患者的预后和风险分级。小结:了解全球不同地区和环境的病因对于指导经验性治疗至关重要。抗菌药耐药性将使胸腔积液的治疗面临越来越大的挑战,应提高对处方做法的认识。虽然新发现的发病率和死亡率预测指标被认为有利于将其纳入临床实践,但还需要进一步的工作来预测病情、进行风险分级和标准化治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
109
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine is a highly regarded journal offering insightful editorials and on-the-mark invited reviews, covering key subjects such as asthma; cystic fibrosis; infectious diseases; diseases of the pleura; and sleep and respiratory neurobiology. Published bimonthly, each issue of Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine introduces world renowned guest editors and internationally recognized academics within the pulmonary field, delivering a widespread selection of expert assessments on the latest developments from the most recent literature.
期刊最新文献
Household air pollution and respiratory health in Africa: persistent risk and unchanged health burdens. Pulmonary embolism work-up in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations: what is the best strategy for clinicians? The bronchiectasis microbiome: current understanding and treatment implications. Impact of occupational exposures in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: current understanding and knowledge gaps. Abnormal spirometry in individuals with a smoking history and no known obstructive lung disease: current understanding and clinical implications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1