The bronchiectasis microbiome: current understanding and treatment implications.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-02 DOI:10.1097/MCP.0000000000001131
Jayanth Kumar Narayana, Micheál Mac Aogáin, Philip M Hansbro, Sanjay H Chotirmall
{"title":"The bronchiectasis microbiome: current understanding and treatment implications.","authors":"Jayanth Kumar Narayana, Micheál Mac Aogáin, Philip M Hansbro, Sanjay H Chotirmall","doi":"10.1097/MCP.0000000000001131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Advances in DNA sequencing and analysis of the respiratory microbiome highlight its close association with bronchiectasis phenotypes, revealing fresh opportunities for diagnosis, stratification, and personalized clinical intervention. An under-recognized condition, bronchiectasis is increasingly the subject of recent large-scale, multicentre, and longitudinal clinical studies including detailed analysis of the microbiome. In this review, we summarize recent progress in our understanding of the bronchiectasis microbiome within the context of its potential use in treatment decisions.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Diverse microbiome profiles exist in bronchiectasis, in line with the established disease heterogeneity including treatment response. Classical microbiology has established Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Haemophilus influenza as two microbial markers of disease, while holistic microbiome analysis has uncovered important associations with less common bacterial taxa including commensal an/or pathobiont species, including the emerging role of the fungal mycobiome, virome, and interactome. Integration of airway microbiomes with other high-dimensional biological and clinical datasets holds significant promise to determining treatable traits and mechanisms of disease related to the microbiome.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>The bronchiectasis microbiome is an emerging and key area of study with significant implications for understanding bronchiectasis, influencing treatment decisions and ultimately improving patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":11090,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"135-144"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCP.0000000000001131","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: Advances in DNA sequencing and analysis of the respiratory microbiome highlight its close association with bronchiectasis phenotypes, revealing fresh opportunities for diagnosis, stratification, and personalized clinical intervention. An under-recognized condition, bronchiectasis is increasingly the subject of recent large-scale, multicentre, and longitudinal clinical studies including detailed analysis of the microbiome. In this review, we summarize recent progress in our understanding of the bronchiectasis microbiome within the context of its potential use in treatment decisions.

Recent findings: Diverse microbiome profiles exist in bronchiectasis, in line with the established disease heterogeneity including treatment response. Classical microbiology has established Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Haemophilus influenza as two microbial markers of disease, while holistic microbiome analysis has uncovered important associations with less common bacterial taxa including commensal an/or pathobiont species, including the emerging role of the fungal mycobiome, virome, and interactome. Integration of airway microbiomes with other high-dimensional biological and clinical datasets holds significant promise to determining treatable traits and mechanisms of disease related to the microbiome.

Summary: The bronchiectasis microbiome is an emerging and key area of study with significant implications for understanding bronchiectasis, influencing treatment decisions and ultimately improving patient outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
支气管扩张症微生物组:目前的认识和治疗意义。
综述的目的:呼吸道微生物组 DNA 测序和分析的进展突显了其与支气管扩张症表型的密切联系,为诊断、分层和个性化临床干预提供了新的机遇。支气管扩张症是一种未得到充分认识的疾病,最近越来越多地成为大规模、多中心和纵向临床研究的主题,其中包括对微生物组的详细分析。在这篇综述中,我们总结了最近我们在了解支气管扩张症微生物组方面取得的进展,以及微生物组在治疗决策中的潜在用途:支气管扩张症患者的微生物组情况多种多样,这与已确定的疾病异质性(包括治疗反应)相一致。经典微生物学已将铜绿假单胞菌和流感嗜血杆菌确定为疾病的两个微生物标志物,而整体微生物组分析则发现了与较少见的细菌类群(包括共生菌和/或致病菌)的重要关联,包括真菌菌生物组、病毒组和相互作用组的新作用。将气道微生物组与其他高维生物和临床数据集整合在一起,有望确定与微生物组相关的可治疗性状和疾病机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
109
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine is a highly regarded journal offering insightful editorials and on-the-mark invited reviews, covering key subjects such as asthma; cystic fibrosis; infectious diseases; diseases of the pleura; and sleep and respiratory neurobiology. Published bimonthly, each issue of Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine introduces world renowned guest editors and internationally recognized academics within the pulmonary field, delivering a widespread selection of expert assessments on the latest developments from the most recent literature.
期刊最新文献
Household air pollution and respiratory health in Africa: persistent risk and unchanged health burdens. Pulmonary embolism work-up in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations: what is the best strategy for clinicians? The bronchiectasis microbiome: current understanding and treatment implications. Impact of occupational exposures in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: current understanding and knowledge gaps. Abnormal spirometry in individuals with a smoking history and no known obstructive lung disease: current understanding and clinical implications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1