Pulmonary embolism work-up in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations: what is the best strategy for clinicians?

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-23 DOI:10.1097/MCP.0000000000001130
David Jiménez, Laurent Bertoletti, Behnood Bikdeli
{"title":"Pulmonary embolism work-up in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations: what is the best strategy for clinicians?","authors":"David Jiménez, Laurent Bertoletti, Behnood Bikdeli","doi":"10.1097/MCP.0000000000001130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are important events in the natural course of COPD, as they increase morbidity and mortality. Acute pulmonary embolism may mimic the symptoms of COPD exacerbations. However, the exact prevalence of pulmonary embolism in unexplained exacerbations of COPD is unclear based on the current data. This review provides a practical approach to patients with COPD complaining of worsening respiratory symptoms.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>A randomized clinical trial has shown that a routine pulmonary embolism diagnostic work-up does not improve care of patients with acute exacerbations of COPD. However, review of the recent literature suggests that a nonnegligible proportion of otherwise unexplained exacerbations of COPD may be caused by pulmonary embolism. To date, nevertheless, there are limited studies developing and validating clinical models that might aid in the identification of patients requiring additional tests for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Until new evidence becomes available, we believe that a routine diagnostic strategy for pulmonary embolism is not appropriate for patients with acute exacerbations of COPD. Recommendations for routine pulmonary embolism diagnostic work-up necessitate further development of prognostic models and conduct of clinical trials that assess important health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":11090,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"175-181"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCP.0000000000001130","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: Acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are important events in the natural course of COPD, as they increase morbidity and mortality. Acute pulmonary embolism may mimic the symptoms of COPD exacerbations. However, the exact prevalence of pulmonary embolism in unexplained exacerbations of COPD is unclear based on the current data. This review provides a practical approach to patients with COPD complaining of worsening respiratory symptoms.

Recent findings: A randomized clinical trial has shown that a routine pulmonary embolism diagnostic work-up does not improve care of patients with acute exacerbations of COPD. However, review of the recent literature suggests that a nonnegligible proportion of otherwise unexplained exacerbations of COPD may be caused by pulmonary embolism. To date, nevertheless, there are limited studies developing and validating clinical models that might aid in the identification of patients requiring additional tests for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.

Summary: Until new evidence becomes available, we believe that a routine diagnostic strategy for pulmonary embolism is not appropriate for patients with acute exacerbations of COPD. Recommendations for routine pulmonary embolism diagnostic work-up necessitate further development of prognostic models and conduct of clinical trials that assess important health outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
慢性阻塞性肺病加重期的肺栓塞检查:临床医生的最佳策略是什么?
审查目的:慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)急性加重是慢性阻塞性肺疾病自然病程中的重要事件,因为它会增加发病率和死亡率。急性肺栓塞可能与慢性阻塞性肺疾病加重的症状相似。然而,根据目前的数据,慢性阻塞性肺病不明原因加重时肺栓塞的确切发病率尚不清楚。本综述为主诉呼吸道症状恶化的慢性阻塞性肺病患者提供了一种实用的方法:一项随机临床试验显示,常规肺栓塞诊断检查并不能改善对慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重患者的护理。然而,最近的文献综述表明,有相当一部分原因不明的慢性阻塞性肺病加重可能是由肺栓塞引起的。总结:在获得新的证据之前,我们认为常规肺栓塞诊断策略并不适合慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重患者。关于常规肺栓塞诊断工作的建议需要进一步开发预后模型,并开展临床试验以评估重要的健康结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
109
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine is a highly regarded journal offering insightful editorials and on-the-mark invited reviews, covering key subjects such as asthma; cystic fibrosis; infectious diseases; diseases of the pleura; and sleep and respiratory neurobiology. Published bimonthly, each issue of Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine introduces world renowned guest editors and internationally recognized academics within the pulmonary field, delivering a widespread selection of expert assessments on the latest developments from the most recent literature.
期刊最新文献
Household air pollution and respiratory health in Africa: persistent risk and unchanged health burdens. Pulmonary embolism work-up in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations: what is the best strategy for clinicians? The bronchiectasis microbiome: current understanding and treatment implications. Impact of occupational exposures in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: current understanding and knowledge gaps. Abnormal spirometry in individuals with a smoking history and no known obstructive lung disease: current understanding and clinical implications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1