The Value of Endoscopic Exposure of Round Window in Cochlear Implant via Facial Recess.

IF 1 Q3 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology Pub Date : 2024-02-05 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0043-1775811
Mena Maher Nassif, Islam Mohamed Hussein Darahem, Ahmed Abdelmoneim Teaima, Mustafa Mohamed Mustafa, Mohamed Saad Hassab Allah, Samer Ahmed Ibrahim
{"title":"The Value of Endoscopic Exposure of Round Window in Cochlear Implant via Facial Recess.","authors":"Mena Maher Nassif, Islam Mohamed Hussein Darahem, Ahmed Abdelmoneim Teaima, Mustafa Mohamed Mustafa, Mohamed Saad Hassab Allah, Samer Ahmed Ibrahim","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1775811","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction</b>  Cochlear implantation has been considered as the best treatment in patients with severe to profound hearing loss unaidable with hearing aids. The main value of endoscope-assisted cochlear implantation is improved visibility of the RW <b>Objective</b>  to assess the value of endoscopic assisted CI surgery via facial recess approach without elevating tympanic anulus. <b>Methods</b>  This Prospective case series study non-randomized sample was performed on 50 patients with severe to profound hearing loss unaidable with hearing aids undergoing unilateral endoscopic assisted cochlear implant surgery with round window electrode insertion <b>Results</b>  There were 23 male and 27 female patients. Most of the cases were children (41 cases). Of those 50 patients, 39 were prelingually hearing impaired. Four cases had various inner ear abnormalities. The standard mastoidectomy and Posterior Tympanotomy approach were used for all cases. Endoscopic identification of the RW through the PT enabled us to perform regular surgery in all cases. The current study concludes the difference between microscopic exposure and endoscopic exposure represented by Saint Tomas classification found that endoscopic exposure of round window classification is better represented by downgrading in the classification of round window exposure as type I 29(58%), type IIa 18(36%) type IIb 3 (6%) Non were type III by endoscopic exposure compared to microscopic exposure of round window is a type I 7(14%), type II 14(28%), type IIb 22(44%) and type III 7 (14%). <b>Conclusion</b>  Endoscopy proved a great value in exposure and identification of RW in CI surgery through posterior tympanotomy approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":13731,"journal":{"name":"International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology","volume":"28 1","pages":"e107-e114"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10843911/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1775811","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction  Cochlear implantation has been considered as the best treatment in patients with severe to profound hearing loss unaidable with hearing aids. The main value of endoscope-assisted cochlear implantation is improved visibility of the RW Objective  to assess the value of endoscopic assisted CI surgery via facial recess approach without elevating tympanic anulus. Methods  This Prospective case series study non-randomized sample was performed on 50 patients with severe to profound hearing loss unaidable with hearing aids undergoing unilateral endoscopic assisted cochlear implant surgery with round window electrode insertion Results  There were 23 male and 27 female patients. Most of the cases were children (41 cases). Of those 50 patients, 39 were prelingually hearing impaired. Four cases had various inner ear abnormalities. The standard mastoidectomy and Posterior Tympanotomy approach were used for all cases. Endoscopic identification of the RW through the PT enabled us to perform regular surgery in all cases. The current study concludes the difference between microscopic exposure and endoscopic exposure represented by Saint Tomas classification found that endoscopic exposure of round window classification is better represented by downgrading in the classification of round window exposure as type I 29(58%), type IIa 18(36%) type IIb 3 (6%) Non were type III by endoscopic exposure compared to microscopic exposure of round window is a type I 7(14%), type II 14(28%), type IIb 22(44%) and type III 7 (14%). Conclusion  Endoscopy proved a great value in exposure and identification of RW in CI surgery through posterior tympanotomy approach.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过面部凹陷在内窥镜下暴露人工耳蜗圆窗的价值。
导言 人工耳蜗植入术一直被认为是无法使用助听器的重度到极重度听力损失患者的最佳治疗方法。内窥镜辅助人工耳蜗植入术的主要价值在于提高了人工耳蜗的可视性 目的 评估通过面部凹陷方法进行内窥镜辅助人工耳蜗植入手术的价值,而无需抬高鼓室。方法 对 50 名无法使用助听器的重度至极重度听力损失患者进行非随机抽样的前瞻性病例系列研究,这些患者接受了单侧内窥镜辅助人工耳蜗植入手术,并植入了圆窗电极。大多数病例为儿童(41 例)。在这 50 例患者中,39 例为舌前听力受损。4 例患者有各种内耳畸形。所有病例均采用标准乳突切除术和鼓室后切口法。内窥镜通过 PT 识别 RW 使我们能够对所有病例实施常规手术。目前的研究总结了以圣托马斯分类法为代表的显微镜下暴露和内窥镜下暴露之间的差异,发现内窥镜下暴露的圆窗分类法更好地代表了圆窗暴露的降级分类,即 I 型 29(58%)、IIa 型 18(36%)、IIb 型 3(6%),但内窥镜下暴露的圆窗与显微镜下暴露的圆窗相比,属于 III 型,即 I 型 7(14%)、II 型 14(28%)、IIb 型 22(44%)和 III 型 7(14%)。结论 在通过鼓室后切口进行的 CI 手术中,内窥镜在暴露和识别圆窗方面具有重要价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
84
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Audiological Characterization of Individuals with Cornelia de Lange Syndrome. Do Anatomical Variations of Sphenoid Sinus Influence Sella Exposure and Residual Disease in Pituitary Surgery? - A Study in an Indian Population. Dysphagia: Focus in Diagnosis. Efficacy of Expansion Pharyngoplasty without Drug-induced Sleep Endoscopy Screening in Obstructive Sleep Apnea. Results of a New Treatment Protocol for Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss Using Betamethasone for Intratympanic Therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1