Evaluation experts: Relations between ability emotional intelligence and attitude strength indicators.

IF 3.4 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Emotion Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-08 DOI:10.1037/emo0001329
Roberta L Irvin, Sukumarakurup Krishnakumar, Michael D Robinson
{"title":"Evaluation experts: Relations between ability emotional intelligence and attitude strength indicators.","authors":"Roberta L Irvin, Sukumarakurup Krishnakumar, Michael D Robinson","doi":"10.1037/emo0001329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>New efforts to understand the processes involved in ability-related emotional intelligence (ability EI) could reinvigorate this area of scholarship and research. It is proposed that participants with higher levels of ability EI are evaluation experts, which should be evident in the attitude domain. Study 1 (<i>n</i> = 148) probed for affective, cognitive, and behavioral reactions to a diverse set of attitude objects. In addition, attitude certainty ratings were collected. Higher levels of ability EI, but not self-reports of EI, were linked to attitudes that were more extreme, certain, and structurally integrated. In Study 2 (<i>n</i> = 602), participant employees completed standard personality and job satisfaction assessments. Higher levels of ability EI were predictive of greater polarization (as assessed in extremity-related terms) in both domains. The individual differences assessed by ability EI, these results suggest, also tend to support attitudes and opinions with stronger features. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48417,"journal":{"name":"Emotion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emotion","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0001329","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

New efforts to understand the processes involved in ability-related emotional intelligence (ability EI) could reinvigorate this area of scholarship and research. It is proposed that participants with higher levels of ability EI are evaluation experts, which should be evident in the attitude domain. Study 1 (n = 148) probed for affective, cognitive, and behavioral reactions to a diverse set of attitude objects. In addition, attitude certainty ratings were collected. Higher levels of ability EI, but not self-reports of EI, were linked to attitudes that were more extreme, certain, and structurally integrated. In Study 2 (n = 602), participant employees completed standard personality and job satisfaction assessments. Higher levels of ability EI were predictive of greater polarization (as assessed in extremity-related terms) in both domains. The individual differences assessed by ability EI, these results suggest, also tend to support attitudes and opinions with stronger features. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估专家:能力情商与态度强度指标之间的关系。
为了解与能力相关的情商(能力情商)所涉及的过程而做出的新努力,可以为这一领域的学术研究注入新的活力。有人提出,能力情商水平较高的参与者是评价专家,这一点在态度领域应该很明显。研究 1(n = 148)调查了对不同态度对象的情感、认知和行为反应。此外,还收集了态度确定性评分。较高水平的能力情感指数(而不是情感指数的自我报告)与更极端、更确定和结构更完整的态度相关联。在研究 2(n = 602)中,参与研究的员工完成了标准人格和工作满意度评估。能力情感指数越高,这两个领域的极化程度越高(以极端性相关术语评估)。这些结果表明,能力 EI 所评估的个体差异也倾向于支持具有更强特征的态度和观点。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Emotion
Emotion PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
325
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Emotion publishes significant contributions to the study of emotion from a wide range of theoretical traditions and research domains. The journal includes articles that advance knowledge and theory about all aspects of emotional processes, including reports of substantial empirical studies, scholarly reviews, and major theoretical articles. Submissions from all domains of emotion research are encouraged, including studies focusing on cultural, social, temperament and personality, cognitive, developmental, health, or biological variables that affect or are affected by emotional functioning. Both laboratory and field studies are appropriate for the journal, as are neuroimaging studies of emotional processes.
期刊最新文献
Loneliness and emotion regulation: A meta-analytic review. Regulating and emerging: Extrinsic affect improvement and the emergence of leadership. Learning to suppress what I fear. Behavioral and neural evidence for difficulty recognizing masked emotional faces. Empathic accuracy and interpersonal emotion regulation in close relationships.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1