Empowerment of Learners through Curriculum Co-Creation: Practical Implications of a Radical Educational Theory.

IF 2.1 3区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Teaching and Learning in Medicine Pub Date : 2024-02-08 DOI:10.1080/10401334.2024.2313212
Hugh A Stoddard, Annika C Lee, Holly C Gooding
{"title":"Empowerment of Learners through Curriculum Co-Creation: Practical Implications of a Radical Educational Theory.","authors":"Hugh A Stoddard, Annika C Lee, Holly C Gooding","doi":"10.1080/10401334.2024.2313212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Framing the Issue</i>: Medical education programs in the U.S. rely on the aphorism that faculty own the curriculum; that is, the specialized knowledge, skills, and attitudes of a physician are the province of the faculty to be delivered to tuition-paying students. From this view, the learner's role is one of passivity and deference. A contrasting approach, termed curriculum co-creation, frames education as a bi-lateral partnership. Co-creation results from learners, in collaboration with instructors, taking an active role in creating the goals and processes of an educational program. Such a partnership requires substantial revision of the expectations for both learners and instructors. In this Observations article, the idea of co-creation is applied to medical education and an aspirational vision for the role and value of faculty-student co-creation is advocated. <i>Description and Explication</i>: Co-creation partnerships of faculty and students occur in many forms, varying in degree of departure from traditional educational practice. Co-creation principles and partnerships can be deployed for almost all aspects of training including selection and organization of content, effective methods of instruction, and assessment of student learning. The outcomes of co-creation occur at three levels. The most specific outcome of co-creation is characterized by increased student engagement and enhanced learning. Broader outcomes include improved efficacy and value in the educational program and institution while, at the farthest-reaching level, a co-creative process can modify the medical profession itself. Although some specific instructional techniques to promote student involvement and input have historically been deployed in medical education, there is little evidence that students have ever been permitted to share in ownership. <i>Implications for Medical Education</i><b>:</b> When fully embraced, curricular co-creation will be recognizable through improved student engagement and learning along with a revised understanding of how faculty-student relationships can foment reform in medical education and the culture of the profession. Further scholarship and research will be indispensable to examine how co-creative partnerships can flatten hierarchies within medical education and inspire the medical profession to be more inclusive and effective. Following the model of co-creation is expected to inspire learners by empowering them to participate fully as co-owners of their own education and prepare them to lead medical education in a different direction for the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":51183,"journal":{"name":"Teaching and Learning in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teaching and Learning in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10401334.2024.2313212","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Framing the Issue: Medical education programs in the U.S. rely on the aphorism that faculty own the curriculum; that is, the specialized knowledge, skills, and attitudes of a physician are the province of the faculty to be delivered to tuition-paying students. From this view, the learner's role is one of passivity and deference. A contrasting approach, termed curriculum co-creation, frames education as a bi-lateral partnership. Co-creation results from learners, in collaboration with instructors, taking an active role in creating the goals and processes of an educational program. Such a partnership requires substantial revision of the expectations for both learners and instructors. In this Observations article, the idea of co-creation is applied to medical education and an aspirational vision for the role and value of faculty-student co-creation is advocated. Description and Explication: Co-creation partnerships of faculty and students occur in many forms, varying in degree of departure from traditional educational practice. Co-creation principles and partnerships can be deployed for almost all aspects of training including selection and organization of content, effective methods of instruction, and assessment of student learning. The outcomes of co-creation occur at three levels. The most specific outcome of co-creation is characterized by increased student engagement and enhanced learning. Broader outcomes include improved efficacy and value in the educational program and institution while, at the farthest-reaching level, a co-creative process can modify the medical profession itself. Although some specific instructional techniques to promote student involvement and input have historically been deployed in medical education, there is little evidence that students have ever been permitted to share in ownership. Implications for Medical Education: When fully embraced, curricular co-creation will be recognizable through improved student engagement and learning along with a revised understanding of how faculty-student relationships can foment reform in medical education and the culture of the profession. Further scholarship and research will be indispensable to examine how co-creative partnerships can flatten hierarchies within medical education and inspire the medical profession to be more inclusive and effective. Following the model of co-creation is expected to inspire learners by empowering them to participate fully as co-owners of their own education and prepare them to lead medical education in a different direction for the future.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过课程共创增强学习者的能力:激进教育理论的现实意义》。
提出问题:美国的医学教育项目依赖于 "教师拥有课程 "这一箴言;也就是说,医生的专业知识、技能和态度是教师的专利,教师要把这些知识、技能和态度传授给交学费的学生。从这种观点来看,学习者的角色是被动和服从。与此相反,一种被称为 "课程共创 "的方法将教育视为一种双边合作关系。共同创造的结果是学习者与教师合作,在创建教育计划的目标和过程中发挥积极作用。这种合作关系要求对学习者和教师的期望值进行实质性修改。在这篇 "观察 "文章中,共同创造的理念被应用到医学教育中,并提倡对师生共同创造的作用和价值进行展望。说明与阐释:师生共创伙伴关系的形式多种多样,偏离传统教育实践的程度也各不相同。共创原则和伙伴关系几乎可以应用于培训的所有方面,包括内容的选择和组织、有效的教学方法和学生学习评估。共同创造的成果体现在三个层面。共同创造最具体的成果是学生参与度的提高和学习效果的增强。更广泛的成果包括提高教育项目和教育机构的效率和价值,而在最深远的层面上,共同创造过程可以改变医学专业本身。虽然在医学教育中曾采用过一些具体的教学方法来促进学生的参与和投入,但很少有证据表明学生曾被允许分享所有权。对医学教育的影响:当课程共同创造被完全接受时,学生的参与度和学习能力将得到提高,同时对师生关系如何促进医学教育改革和专业文化的理解也将得到修正。进一步的学术研究将是不可或缺的,以探讨共同创造的合作关系如何能够扁平化医学教育中的等级制度,并激励医学专业更具包容性和有效性。采用共同创造的模式可望激励学习者,使他们有能力作为自己教育的共同拥有者充分参与其中,并为引领未来医学教育朝着不同的方向发展做好准备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Teaching and Learning in Medicine
Teaching and Learning in Medicine 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
12.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Teaching and Learning in Medicine ( TLM) is an international, forum for scholarship on teaching and learning in the health professions. Its international scope reflects the common challenge faced by all medical educators: fostering the development of capable, well-rounded, and continuous learners prepared to practice in a complex, high-stakes, and ever-changing clinical environment. TLM''s contributors and readership comprise behavioral scientists and health care practitioners, signaling the value of integrating diverse perspectives into a comprehensive understanding of learning and performance. The journal seeks to provide the theoretical foundations and practical analysis needed for effective educational decision making in such areas as admissions, instructional design and delivery, performance assessment, remediation, technology-assisted instruction, diversity management, and faculty development, among others. TLM''s scope includes all levels of medical education, from premedical to postgraduate and continuing medical education, with articles published in the following categories:
期刊最新文献
Policy analysis: an underutilised methodology in health professions education research. Psychometric properties of the Ethiopian national licensing exam in medicine: an analysis of multiple-choice questions using classical test theory. Disability Education for Health Personnel and Impact on Health Outcomes for Persons with Autism: A Scoping Review. Examining Scientific Inquiry of Queerness in Medical Education: A Queer Reading. "I have established this support network": How Chosen Kin Support Women Medical Students During their First Two Years in Medical School.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1