In vivo behavior in rabbit radius bone defect of scaffolds based on nanocarbonate hydroxyapatite

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials Pub Date : 2024-02-13 DOI:10.1002/jbm.b.35391
Lorena García-Lamas, Juan Peña, Jesús Roman, Victoria Cabañas, Beatriz Bravo-Giménez, Verónica Jiménez-Díaz, Sandra Sánchez-Salcedo, Javier Jiménez-Holguín, Monica Abella, Manuel Desco, Daniel Lozano, David Cecilia-López, Antonio Salinas
{"title":"In vivo behavior in rabbit radius bone defect of scaffolds based on nanocarbonate hydroxyapatite","authors":"Lorena García-Lamas,&nbsp;Juan Peña,&nbsp;Jesús Roman,&nbsp;Victoria Cabañas,&nbsp;Beatriz Bravo-Giménez,&nbsp;Verónica Jiménez-Díaz,&nbsp;Sandra Sánchez-Salcedo,&nbsp;Javier Jiménez-Holguín,&nbsp;Monica Abella,&nbsp;Manuel Desco,&nbsp;Daniel Lozano,&nbsp;David Cecilia-López,&nbsp;Antonio Salinas","doi":"10.1002/jbm.b.35391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Bone defects treatment may require the use of biomaterials that behave as a support and promote bone regeneration. Limitations associated with the use of autografts and allografts make it necessary to design new synthetic bone substitutes. Some of the most promising biomaterials currently under investigation are based on nanocarbonate hydroxyapatite (nCHA). In this study, we studied the bone-inducing capacity of nCHA-based scaffolds alone (SAG) and enriched with osteostatin (SAGO) or with bone marrow aspirate(SAGB) after implantation for 12 weeks in a 15-mm long critical defect performed in the radius of New Zealand rabbits. Bone formation obtained was compared with a group with the unfilled defect (CE), as control group, and other with the defect filed with iliac crest autograft (GS), as gold standard. X-ray follow-up was performed at 2, 4, 6 and 12 weeks and μCT and histological studies at 12 weeks. The radiological results showed a greater increment in bone formation in the GS group (75%–100%), followed by the SAG and SAGB groups (50%–75%). μCT results showed an increase of bone volume/tissue volume values in GS group followed by SAG and SAGB groups (0.53, 0.40, and 0.31 respectively) compared with CE group (0.26). Histological results showed limited resorption of the nCHA scaffolds and partial osseointegration in the SAG and SAGB groups. However, in the SAGO group, the presence of connective tissue encapsulating the scaffold was detected. In SAG, SAGB, and increase of bone formation were observed compared with CE group, but less than the GS group. Thus, the investigated materials represent a significant advance in the design of synthetic materials for bone grafting, but further studies are needed to bring their in vivo behavior closer to autograft, the gold standard.</p>","PeriodicalId":15269,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jbm.b.35391","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jbm.b.35391","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bone defects treatment may require the use of biomaterials that behave as a support and promote bone regeneration. Limitations associated with the use of autografts and allografts make it necessary to design new synthetic bone substitutes. Some of the most promising biomaterials currently under investigation are based on nanocarbonate hydroxyapatite (nCHA). In this study, we studied the bone-inducing capacity of nCHA-based scaffolds alone (SAG) and enriched with osteostatin (SAGO) or with bone marrow aspirate(SAGB) after implantation for 12 weeks in a 15-mm long critical defect performed in the radius of New Zealand rabbits. Bone formation obtained was compared with a group with the unfilled defect (CE), as control group, and other with the defect filed with iliac crest autograft (GS), as gold standard. X-ray follow-up was performed at 2, 4, 6 and 12 weeks and μCT and histological studies at 12 weeks. The radiological results showed a greater increment in bone formation in the GS group (75%–100%), followed by the SAG and SAGB groups (50%–75%). μCT results showed an increase of bone volume/tissue volume values in GS group followed by SAG and SAGB groups (0.53, 0.40, and 0.31 respectively) compared with CE group (0.26). Histological results showed limited resorption of the nCHA scaffolds and partial osseointegration in the SAG and SAGB groups. However, in the SAGO group, the presence of connective tissue encapsulating the scaffold was detected. In SAG, SAGB, and increase of bone formation were observed compared with CE group, but less than the GS group. Thus, the investigated materials represent a significant advance in the design of synthetic materials for bone grafting, but further studies are needed to bring their in vivo behavior closer to autograft, the gold standard.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于纳米碳酸羟基磷灰石的支架在兔桡骨缺损中的体内行为。
治疗骨缺损可能需要使用生物材料,这种材料既能起到支撑作用,又能促进骨再生。由于自体移植物和异体移植物的局限性,有必要设计新的合成骨替代物。目前正在研究的一些最有前景的生物材料是基于纳米碳酸羟基磷灰石(nCHA)的。在这项研究中,我们研究了基于 nCHA 的单独支架(SAG)和富含骨生成素(SAGO)或骨髓吸液(SAGB)的支架在新西兰兔桡骨 15 毫米长的临界缺损中植入 12 周后的骨诱导能力。将获得的骨形成情况与作为对照组的未填充缺损组(CE)和作为金标准的髂嵴自体移植缺损组(GS)进行比较。在 2、4、6 和 12 周时进行 X 光随访,12 周时进行μCT 和组织学研究。μCT结果显示,与CE组(0.26)相比,GS组、SAG组和SAGB组的骨量/组织体积值分别增加了0.53、0.40和0.31。组织学结果显示,SAG 组和 SAGB 组的 nCHA 支架吸收有限,部分骨结合。然而,在 SAGO 组中,发现了包裹支架的结缔组织。与 CE 组相比,SAG 组和 SAGB 组的骨形成有所增加,但不及 GS 组。因此,所研究的材料代表了骨移植合成材料设计的一大进步,但要使其体内行为更接近自体移植这一黄金标准,还需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
199
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Biomedical Materials Research – Part B: Applied Biomaterials is a highly interdisciplinary peer-reviewed journal serving the needs of biomaterials professionals who design, develop, produce and apply biomaterials and medical devices. It has the common focus of biomaterials applied to the human body and covers all disciplines where medical devices are used. Papers are published on biomaterials related to medical device development and manufacture, degradation in the body, nano- and biomimetic- biomaterials interactions, mechanics of biomaterials, implant retrieval and analysis, tissue-biomaterial surface interactions, wound healing, infection, drug delivery, standards and regulation of devices, animal and pre-clinical studies of biomaterials and medical devices, and tissue-biopolymer-material combination products. Manuscripts are published in one of six formats: • original research reports • short research and development reports • scientific reviews • current concepts articles • special reports • editorials Journal of Biomedical Materials Research – Part B: Applied Biomaterials is an official journal of the Society for Biomaterials, Japanese Society for Biomaterials, the Australasian Society for Biomaterials, and the Korean Society for Biomaterials. Manuscripts from all countries are invited but must be in English. Authors are not required to be members of the affiliated Societies, but members of these societies are encouraged to submit their work to the journal for consideration.
期刊最新文献
Accelerated In Vitro Oxidative Degradation Testing of Ultra-High Molecular Weight Polyethylene (UHMWPE) Issue Information Biocompatible and Safe Decellularized Spinach With Antibacterial and Wound Healing Activity In Vitro and In Vivo Biocompatibility of Bacterial Cellulose Molecular Biomarkers for In Vitro Thrombogenicity Assessment of Medical Device Materials
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1